通过流动医疗单位提供治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的药物:范围综述。

0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Amelia Bailey , Alyssa DaCunha , Siena C. Napoleon , Augustine W. Kang , Madeleine Kemo , Rosemarie A. Martin
{"title":"通过流动医疗单位提供治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的药物:范围综述。","authors":"Amelia Bailey ,&nbsp;Alyssa DaCunha ,&nbsp;Siena C. Napoleon ,&nbsp;Augustine W. Kang ,&nbsp;Madeleine Kemo ,&nbsp;Rosemarie A. Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Mobile health units (MHUs) provide a variety of low-barrier services to populations that face systemic barriers to healthcare access. However, MHUs are not a common delivery method for medications to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD), and, of these, there is no consensus regarding MHU targeted objectives and outcomes. This scoping review seeks to summarize the state of the literature examining the delivery of MOUD by MHUs in the United States.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A search of PubMed, PsycInfo, and CINAHL on February 21, 2023, found 223 articles. Two authors completed title and abstract and full text reviews and extracted data relevant to intervention and study design, program objectives, and study outcomes. Ten articles fit the study's inclusion criteria (nine total interventions).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 10 studies, six were cohort designs, three were cross-sectional (one with qualitative interviews), and one study conducted qualitative interviews only. Most studies were located in the Northeastern United States. MHU interventions primarily aimed to provide MOUD and to retain populations in treatment. Two interventions aimed to engage patients and then transfer them to fixed-site MOUD providers. Across four interventions that provided buprenorphine, 1- and 3-month retention rates varied from 31.6 % to 72.3 % and 26.2 % to 58.5 %, respectively. Qualitative interviews found that MOUD delivery from the MHU was characterized by less stigma/judgment and greater privacy compared to fixed-site, and it was flexible and low-barrier. MHUs were reportedly underutilized by the target populations, suggesting a lack of awareness from community members with opioid use disorder.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>MHUs that deliver MOUD are both under-provided and -utilized. Future research should continue to assess MOUD provision from MHUs with an emphasis on robust study design, application to other formulations of MOUD, and evaluation of outcomes such as participant satisfaction and key informant perceived challenges.</p><p><strong>Registration:</strong> Submitted to Open Science Framework (OSF) Repository on February 6, 2023.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Provision of medications to treat opioid use disorder via a mobile health unit: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Amelia Bailey ,&nbsp;Alyssa DaCunha ,&nbsp;Siena C. Napoleon ,&nbsp;Augustine W. Kang ,&nbsp;Madeleine Kemo ,&nbsp;Rosemarie A. Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Mobile health units (MHUs) provide a variety of low-barrier services to populations that face systemic barriers to healthcare access. However, MHUs are not a common delivery method for medications to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD), and, of these, there is no consensus regarding MHU targeted objectives and outcomes. This scoping review seeks to summarize the state of the literature examining the delivery of MOUD by MHUs in the United States.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A search of PubMed, PsycInfo, and CINAHL on February 21, 2023, found 223 articles. Two authors completed title and abstract and full text reviews and extracted data relevant to intervention and study design, program objectives, and study outcomes. Ten articles fit the study's inclusion criteria (nine total interventions).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 10 studies, six were cohort designs, three were cross-sectional (one with qualitative interviews), and one study conducted qualitative interviews only. Most studies were located in the Northeastern United States. MHU interventions primarily aimed to provide MOUD and to retain populations in treatment. Two interventions aimed to engage patients and then transfer them to fixed-site MOUD providers. Across four interventions that provided buprenorphine, 1- and 3-month retention rates varied from 31.6 % to 72.3 % and 26.2 % to 58.5 %, respectively. Qualitative interviews found that MOUD delivery from the MHU was characterized by less stigma/judgment and greater privacy compared to fixed-site, and it was flexible and low-barrier. MHUs were reportedly underutilized by the target populations, suggesting a lack of awareness from community members with opioid use disorder.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>MHUs that deliver MOUD are both under-provided and -utilized. Future research should continue to assess MOUD provision from MHUs with an emphasis on robust study design, application to other formulations of MOUD, and evaluation of outcomes such as participant satisfaction and key informant perceived challenges.</p><p><strong>Registration:</strong> Submitted to Open Science Framework (OSF) Repository on February 6, 2023.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875924001437\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875924001437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:移动医疗单位(MHU)为面临系统性医疗障碍的人群提供各种低门槛服务。然而,移动医疗单位并不是治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)的常见药物提供方式,而且在移动医疗单位的目标和结果方面也没有达成共识。本范围综述旨在总结研究美国 MHU 提供阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的文献现状:方法:2023 年 2 月 21 日对 PubMed、PsycInfo 和 CINAHL 进行了检索,共发现 223 篇文章。两位作者完成了标题、摘要和全文的审阅,并提取了与干预和研究设计、计划目标和研究结果相关的数据。有 10 篇文章符合研究的纳入标准(共有 9 项干预措施):在这 10 项研究中,有 6 项是队列设计,3 项是横断面设计(其中 1 项带有定性访谈),1 项研究只进行了定性访谈。大多数研究位于美国东北部。MHU 干预措施的主要目的是提供 MOUD 并使患者继续接受治疗。两项干预措施旨在让患者参与治疗,然后将他们转给固定地点的 MOUD 提供者。在提供丁丙诺啡的四项干预措施中,1 个月和 3 个月的保留率分别从 31.6% 到 72.3% 和 26.2% 到 58.5% 不等。定性访谈发现,与固定地点相比,在医疗保健单位提供丁丙诺啡的特点是污名化/评判较少、隐私性更高,而且灵活、门槛低。据报道,目标人群对医疗室的利用率较低,这表明患有阿片类药物使用障碍的社区成员对医疗室缺乏认识:结论:提供阿片类药物滥用障碍治疗的医疗保健单位服务不足,利用率也不高。未来的研究应继续评估医疗卫生机构提供的 "颅内暴力治疗",重点是健全的研究设计、对 "颅内暴力治疗 "其他形式的应用,以及对参与者满意度和主要信息提供者认为存在的挑战等结果的评估:于2023年2月6日提交至开放科学资料库(OSF)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Provision of medications to treat opioid use disorder via a mobile health unit: A scoping review

Introduction

Mobile health units (MHUs) provide a variety of low-barrier services to populations that face systemic barriers to healthcare access. However, MHUs are not a common delivery method for medications to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD), and, of these, there is no consensus regarding MHU targeted objectives and outcomes. This scoping review seeks to summarize the state of the literature examining the delivery of MOUD by MHUs in the United States.

Methods

A search of PubMed, PsycInfo, and CINAHL on February 21, 2023, found 223 articles. Two authors completed title and abstract and full text reviews and extracted data relevant to intervention and study design, program objectives, and study outcomes. Ten articles fit the study's inclusion criteria (nine total interventions).

Results

Of the 10 studies, six were cohort designs, three were cross-sectional (one with qualitative interviews), and one study conducted qualitative interviews only. Most studies were located in the Northeastern United States. MHU interventions primarily aimed to provide MOUD and to retain populations in treatment. Two interventions aimed to engage patients and then transfer them to fixed-site MOUD providers. Across four interventions that provided buprenorphine, 1- and 3-month retention rates varied from 31.6 % to 72.3 % and 26.2 % to 58.5 %, respectively. Qualitative interviews found that MOUD delivery from the MHU was characterized by less stigma/judgment and greater privacy compared to fixed-site, and it was flexible and low-barrier. MHUs were reportedly underutilized by the target populations, suggesting a lack of awareness from community members with opioid use disorder.

Conclusions

MHUs that deliver MOUD are both under-provided and -utilized. Future research should continue to assess MOUD provision from MHUs with an emphasis on robust study design, application to other formulations of MOUD, and evaluation of outcomes such as participant satisfaction and key informant perceived challenges.

Registration: Submitted to Open Science Framework (OSF) Repository on February 6, 2023.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信