{"title":"中断口服霉酚酸酯预防移植物抗宿主病对单次脐带血移植结果的影响。","authors":"Kahori Fukushi, Maki Monna-Oiwa, Seiko Kato, Masamichi Isobe, Seiichiro Kuroda, Yasuhito Nannya, Satoshi Takahashi, Takaaki Konuma","doi":"10.31547/bct-2023-038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), in combination with a calcineurin inhibitor, is used as the prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Compared to intravenous methotrexate (MTX), MMF is associated with a lower incidence of mucositis and shorter time for hematopoietic engraftment but comparable incidence of acute GVHD, resulting in the preferred use of MMF for GVHD prophylaxis in elderly patients or those undergoing cord blood transplantation (CBT). Although several studies have evaluated the clinical impact of MTX omission due to toxicity after allogeneic HCT, the impact of oral MMF interruption for GVHD prophylaxis on transplant outcomes remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we retrospectively analyzed the consecutive data of adult patients who underwent single-unit unrelated CBT and received oral MMF in combination with cyclosporine for GVHD prophylaxis at our hospital. Among the 53 patients, the planned dose of MMF was interrupted in 14 with a median of 19.5 d (range, 3-27 d) of CBT. In multivariate analysis, MMF interruption, which was treated as a time-dependent covariate, was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 5.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.03-14.43; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and higher non-relapse mortality (HR, 7.56; 95% CI, 1.99-28.79; <i>P</i> = 0.002). Further studies with larger cohorts are necessary to confirm the clinical significance of oral MMF interruption in GVHD prophylaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":72423,"journal":{"name":"Blood cell therapy","volume":"7 2","pages":"41-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11153209/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of interruption of oral mycophenolate mofetil for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis on outcomes after single cord blood transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"Kahori Fukushi, Maki Monna-Oiwa, Seiko Kato, Masamichi Isobe, Seiichiro Kuroda, Yasuhito Nannya, Satoshi Takahashi, Takaaki Konuma\",\"doi\":\"10.31547/bct-2023-038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), in combination with a calcineurin inhibitor, is used as the prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Compared to intravenous methotrexate (MTX), MMF is associated with a lower incidence of mucositis and shorter time for hematopoietic engraftment but comparable incidence of acute GVHD, resulting in the preferred use of MMF for GVHD prophylaxis in elderly patients or those undergoing cord blood transplantation (CBT). Although several studies have evaluated the clinical impact of MTX omission due to toxicity after allogeneic HCT, the impact of oral MMF interruption for GVHD prophylaxis on transplant outcomes remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we retrospectively analyzed the consecutive data of adult patients who underwent single-unit unrelated CBT and received oral MMF in combination with cyclosporine for GVHD prophylaxis at our hospital. Among the 53 patients, the planned dose of MMF was interrupted in 14 with a median of 19.5 d (range, 3-27 d) of CBT. In multivariate analysis, MMF interruption, which was treated as a time-dependent covariate, was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 5.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.03-14.43; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and higher non-relapse mortality (HR, 7.56; 95% CI, 1.99-28.79; <i>P</i> = 0.002). Further studies with larger cohorts are necessary to confirm the clinical significance of oral MMF interruption in GVHD prophylaxis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood cell therapy\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"41-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11153209/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood cell therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31547/bct-2023-038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood cell therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31547/bct-2023-038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Influence of interruption of oral mycophenolate mofetil for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis on outcomes after single cord blood transplantation.
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), in combination with a calcineurin inhibitor, is used as the prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Compared to intravenous methotrexate (MTX), MMF is associated with a lower incidence of mucositis and shorter time for hematopoietic engraftment but comparable incidence of acute GVHD, resulting in the preferred use of MMF for GVHD prophylaxis in elderly patients or those undergoing cord blood transplantation (CBT). Although several studies have evaluated the clinical impact of MTX omission due to toxicity after allogeneic HCT, the impact of oral MMF interruption for GVHD prophylaxis on transplant outcomes remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we retrospectively analyzed the consecutive data of adult patients who underwent single-unit unrelated CBT and received oral MMF in combination with cyclosporine for GVHD prophylaxis at our hospital. Among the 53 patients, the planned dose of MMF was interrupted in 14 with a median of 19.5 d (range, 3-27 d) of CBT. In multivariate analysis, MMF interruption, which was treated as a time-dependent covariate, was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 5.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.03-14.43; P < 0.001) and higher non-relapse mortality (HR, 7.56; 95% CI, 1.99-28.79; P = 0.002). Further studies with larger cohorts are necessary to confirm the clinical significance of oral MMF interruption in GVHD prophylaxis.