探索抗精神病药物在医院、亚急性康复和老年护理机构成人谵妄管理中的应用:系统性文献综述。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Drugs & Aging Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1007/s40266-024-01122-z
Emily J Tomlinson, Linda M Schnitker, Penelope A Casey
{"title":"探索抗精神病药物在医院、亚急性康复和老年护理机构成人谵妄管理中的应用:系统性文献综述。","authors":"Emily J Tomlinson, Linda M Schnitker, Penelope A Casey","doi":"10.1007/s40266-024-01122-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International guidelines discourage antipsychotic use for delirium; however, concerns persist about their continued use in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to describe the prevalence and patterns of antipsychotic use in delirium management with regard to best-practice recommendations. Primary outcomes investigated were prevalence of use, antipsychotic type, dosage and clinical indication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligibility criteria: studies of any design that examined antipsychotic use to manage delirium in adults in critical care, acute care, palliative care, rehabilitation, and aged care were included. Studies of patients in acute psychiatric care, with psychiatric illness or pre-existing antipsychotic use were excluded.</p><p><strong>Information sources: </strong>we searched five health databases on 16 August, 2023 (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, APA PsycInfo, ProQuest Health and Medical Collection) using MeSH terms and relevant keywords, including 'delirium' and 'antipsychotic'. Risk of bias: as no included studies were randomised controlled trials, all studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.</p><p><strong>Synthesis of results: </strong>descriptive data were extracted in Covidence and synthesised in Microsoft Excel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Included studies: 39 studies published between March 2004 and August 2023 from 13 countries (n = 1,359,519 patients). Most study designs were retrospective medical record audits (n = 16).</p><p><strong>Synthesis of results: </strong>in 18 studies, participants' mean age was ≥65 years (77.79, ±5.20). Palliative care had the highest average proportion of patients with delirium managed with antipsychotics (70.87%, ±33.81%); it was lower and varied little between intensive care unit (53.53%, ±19.73%) and non-intensive care unit settings [medical, surgical and any acute care wards] (56.93%, ±26.44%) and was lowest in in-patient rehabilitation (17.8%). Seventeen different antipsychotics were reported on. In patients aged ≥65 years, haloperidol was the most frequently used and at higher than recommended mean daily doses (2.75 mg, ±2.21 mg). Other antipsychotics commonly administered were olanzapine (mean 11 mg, ±8.54 mg), quetiapine (mean 64.23 mg, ±43.20 mg) and risperidone (mean 0.97 mg, ±0.64 mg).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of antipsychotics to manage delirium is strongly discouraged in international guidelines. Antipsychotic use in delirium care is a risk for adverse health outcomes and a longer duration of delirium, especially in older people. However, this study has provided evidence that clinicians continue to use antipsychotics for delirium management, the dose, frequency and duration of which are often outside evidence-based guideline recommendations. Clinicians continue to choose antipsychotics to manage delirium symptoms to settle agitation and maintain patient and staff safety, particularly in situations where workload pressures are high. Sustained efforts are needed at the individual, team and organisational levels to educate, train and support clinicians to prioritise non-pharmacological interventions early before deciding to use antipsychotics. This could prevent delirium and avert escalation in behavioural symptoms that often lead to antipsychotic use.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"455-486"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11193698/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Antipsychotic Use for Delirium Management in Adults in Hospital, Sub-Acute Rehabilitation and Aged Care Settings: A Systematic Literature Review.\",\"authors\":\"Emily J Tomlinson, Linda M Schnitker, Penelope A Casey\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40266-024-01122-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International guidelines discourage antipsychotic use for delirium; however, concerns persist about their continued use in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to describe the prevalence and patterns of antipsychotic use in delirium management with regard to best-practice recommendations. Primary outcomes investigated were prevalence of use, antipsychotic type, dosage and clinical indication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligibility criteria: studies of any design that examined antipsychotic use to manage delirium in adults in critical care, acute care, palliative care, rehabilitation, and aged care were included. Studies of patients in acute psychiatric care, with psychiatric illness or pre-existing antipsychotic use were excluded.</p><p><strong>Information sources: </strong>we searched five health databases on 16 August, 2023 (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, APA PsycInfo, ProQuest Health and Medical Collection) using MeSH terms and relevant keywords, including 'delirium' and 'antipsychotic'. Risk of bias: as no included studies were randomised controlled trials, all studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.</p><p><strong>Synthesis of results: </strong>descriptive data were extracted in Covidence and synthesised in Microsoft Excel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Included studies: 39 studies published between March 2004 and August 2023 from 13 countries (n = 1,359,519 patients). Most study designs were retrospective medical record audits (n = 16).</p><p><strong>Synthesis of results: </strong>in 18 studies, participants' mean age was ≥65 years (77.79, ±5.20). Palliative care had the highest average proportion of patients with delirium managed with antipsychotics (70.87%, ±33.81%); it was lower and varied little between intensive care unit (53.53%, ±19.73%) and non-intensive care unit settings [medical, surgical and any acute care wards] (56.93%, ±26.44%) and was lowest in in-patient rehabilitation (17.8%). Seventeen different antipsychotics were reported on. In patients aged ≥65 years, haloperidol was the most frequently used and at higher than recommended mean daily doses (2.75 mg, ±2.21 mg). Other antipsychotics commonly administered were olanzapine (mean 11 mg, ±8.54 mg), quetiapine (mean 64.23 mg, ±43.20 mg) and risperidone (mean 0.97 mg, ±0.64 mg).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of antipsychotics to manage delirium is strongly discouraged in international guidelines. Antipsychotic use in delirium care is a risk for adverse health outcomes and a longer duration of delirium, especially in older people. However, this study has provided evidence that clinicians continue to use antipsychotics for delirium management, the dose, frequency and duration of which are often outside evidence-based guideline recommendations. Clinicians continue to choose antipsychotics to manage delirium symptoms to settle agitation and maintain patient and staff safety, particularly in situations where workload pressures are high. Sustained efforts are needed at the individual, team and organisational levels to educate, train and support clinicians to prioritise non-pharmacological interventions early before deciding to use antipsychotics. This could prevent delirium and avert escalation in behavioural symptoms that often lead to antipsychotic use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drugs & Aging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"455-486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11193698/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drugs & Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-024-01122-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-024-01122-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:国际指南不鼓励在谵妄治疗中使用抗精神病药物;然而,临床实践中继续使用抗精神病药物的问题仍令人担忧:我们旨在根据最佳实践建议,描述抗精神病药物在谵妄治疗中的使用率和模式。调查的主要结果包括使用率、抗精神病药物的类型、剂量和临床适应症:资格标准:研究对象包括重症监护、急性护理、姑息治疗、康复和老年护理中使用抗精神病药物治疗成人谵妄的任何设计的研究。信息来源:我们于2023年8月16日使用MeSH术语和相关关键词(包括 "谵妄 "和 "抗精神病药")检索了五个健康数据库(PubMed、CINAHL、Embase、APA PsycInfo、ProQuest Health和Medical Collection)。偏倚风险:由于纳入的研究均为随机对照试验,因此所有研究均采用混合方法评估工具进行方法学质量评估。结果合成:描述性数据在 Covidence 中提取,并在 Microsoft Excel 中合成:纳入的研究2004年3月至2023年8月期间发表的39项研究,来自13个国家(n = 1,359,519名患者)。结果综述:在 18 项研究中,参与者的平均年龄≥65 岁(77.79,±5.20)。在姑息治疗中,使用抗精神病药物治疗的谵妄患者平均比例最高(70.87%,±33.81%);在重症监护病房(53.53%,±19.73%)和非重症监护病房(内科、外科和任何急症监护病房)(56.93%,±26.44%)中,使用抗精神病药物治疗的谵妄患者平均比例较低且差异不大,而在住院康复中,使用抗精神病药物治疗的谵妄患者平均比例最低(17.8%)。报告了 17 种不同的抗精神病药物。在年龄≥65岁的患者中,氟哌啶醇是最常用的药物,其日均剂量高于推荐剂量(2.75毫克,±2.21毫克)。其他常用的抗精神病药物有奥氮平(平均 11 毫克,±8.54 毫克)、喹硫平(平均 64.23 毫克,±43.20 毫克)和利培酮(平均 0.97 毫克,±0.64 毫克):国际指南强烈反对使用抗精神病药物治疗谵妄。在谵妄护理中使用抗精神病药物有可能导致不良健康后果和更长的谵妄持续时间,尤其是在老年人中。然而,本研究提供的证据表明,临床医生仍在使用抗精神病药物来治疗谵妄,其剂量、频率和持续时间往往超出了循证指南的建议范围。临床医生继续选择抗精神病药物来控制谵妄症状,以平息躁动并维护患者和医护人员的安全,尤其是在工作量压力较大的情况下。需要在个人、团队和组织层面持续努力,教育、培训和支持临床医生在决定使用抗精神病药物之前,尽早优先考虑非药物干预措施。这可以预防谵妄并避免行为症状的升级,而行为症状的升级往往会导致抗精神病药物的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring Antipsychotic Use for Delirium Management in Adults in Hospital, Sub-Acute Rehabilitation and Aged Care Settings: A Systematic Literature Review.

Exploring Antipsychotic Use for Delirium Management in Adults in Hospital, Sub-Acute Rehabilitation and Aged Care Settings: A Systematic Literature Review.

Background: International guidelines discourage antipsychotic use for delirium; however, concerns persist about their continued use in clinical practice.

Objectives: We aimed to describe the prevalence and patterns of antipsychotic use in delirium management with regard to best-practice recommendations. Primary outcomes investigated were prevalence of use, antipsychotic type, dosage and clinical indication.

Methods: Eligibility criteria: studies of any design that examined antipsychotic use to manage delirium in adults in critical care, acute care, palliative care, rehabilitation, and aged care were included. Studies of patients in acute psychiatric care, with psychiatric illness or pre-existing antipsychotic use were excluded.

Information sources: we searched five health databases on 16 August, 2023 (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, APA PsycInfo, ProQuest Health and Medical Collection) using MeSH terms and relevant keywords, including 'delirium' and 'antipsychotic'. Risk of bias: as no included studies were randomised controlled trials, all studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

Synthesis of results: descriptive data were extracted in Covidence and synthesised in Microsoft Excel.

Results: Included studies: 39 studies published between March 2004 and August 2023 from 13 countries (n = 1,359,519 patients). Most study designs were retrospective medical record audits (n = 16).

Synthesis of results: in 18 studies, participants' mean age was ≥65 years (77.79, ±5.20). Palliative care had the highest average proportion of patients with delirium managed with antipsychotics (70.87%, ±33.81%); it was lower and varied little between intensive care unit (53.53%, ±19.73%) and non-intensive care unit settings [medical, surgical and any acute care wards] (56.93%, ±26.44%) and was lowest in in-patient rehabilitation (17.8%). Seventeen different antipsychotics were reported on. In patients aged ≥65 years, haloperidol was the most frequently used and at higher than recommended mean daily doses (2.75 mg, ±2.21 mg). Other antipsychotics commonly administered were olanzapine (mean 11 mg, ±8.54 mg), quetiapine (mean 64.23 mg, ±43.20 mg) and risperidone (mean 0.97 mg, ±0.64 mg).

Conclusions: The use of antipsychotics to manage delirium is strongly discouraged in international guidelines. Antipsychotic use in delirium care is a risk for adverse health outcomes and a longer duration of delirium, especially in older people. However, this study has provided evidence that clinicians continue to use antipsychotics for delirium management, the dose, frequency and duration of which are often outside evidence-based guideline recommendations. Clinicians continue to choose antipsychotics to manage delirium symptoms to settle agitation and maintain patient and staff safety, particularly in situations where workload pressures are high. Sustained efforts are needed at the individual, team and organisational levels to educate, train and support clinicians to prioritise non-pharmacological interventions early before deciding to use antipsychotics. This could prevent delirium and avert escalation in behavioural symptoms that often lead to antipsychotic use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs & Aging
Drugs & Aging 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs & Aging delivers essential information on the most important aspects of drug therapy to professionals involved in the care of the elderly. The journal addresses in a timely way the major issues relating to drug therapy in older adults including: the management of specific diseases, particularly those associated with aging, age-related physiological changes impacting drug therapy, drug utilization and prescribing in the elderly, polypharmacy and drug interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信