{"title":"与生活质量和社区融合有关的永久性支持住房居民概况","authors":"Marie-Josée Fleury, Nadia L’Espérance, Bahram Armoon","doi":"10.1155/2024/5582411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Permanent supportive housing (PSH) is the main approach advocated in Western countries for eradicating homelessness. Considering that PSH residents are not a homogeneous group and that their quality of life (QoL) and community integration (CI) might differ in this setting, improving our understanding of these residents’ profiles may help stakeholders formulate informed recommendations to improve PSH. This study identified PSH resident profiles based on their QoL, CI, and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and associated these profiles with housing features and service use. A total of 308 PSH residents were recruited in Montreal (Canada) in 2020–2022. Structured interviews were conducted. PSH resident profiles were produced with cluster analysis and subsequently compared using chi-square, Fisher’s, and <i>t</i>-tests, taking into account housing features and service use. Three PSH resident profiles were found. Profile 1 residents (22% of the sample) had low QoL and CI, were younger, and had major social and health issues and unmet needs. Showing moderate QoL and CI, Profile 2 residents (27%) were more educated, had little foster care history, were older on their first homelessness episode, and had few co-occurring MD-SUD. Profile 3 residents (51%) had the best QoL and CI and mostly included men with little education, affected by co-occurring MD-SUD and satisfied with services. More intensive housing support and care coordination may be recommended for Profile 1 PSH residents in response to their diverse needs. Work integration may be beneficial to Profile 2 residents, with programs such as Individual Placement and Support, along with increased rehabilitation activities. A better integration of MD-SUD treatments may be promoted for Profile 3 residents. Considering most PSH residents had multiple health issues and unmet needs, satisfaction with care could be monitored better, as it was found to be a key variable in measuring care adequation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/5582411","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Profiles of Permanent Supportive Housing Residents Related to Their Quality of Life and Community Integration\",\"authors\":\"Marie-Josée Fleury, Nadia L’Espérance, Bahram Armoon\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/5582411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>Permanent supportive housing (PSH) is the main approach advocated in Western countries for eradicating homelessness. Considering that PSH residents are not a homogeneous group and that their quality of life (QoL) and community integration (CI) might differ in this setting, improving our understanding of these residents’ profiles may help stakeholders formulate informed recommendations to improve PSH. This study identified PSH resident profiles based on their QoL, CI, and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and associated these profiles with housing features and service use. A total of 308 PSH residents were recruited in Montreal (Canada) in 2020–2022. Structured interviews were conducted. PSH resident profiles were produced with cluster analysis and subsequently compared using chi-square, Fisher’s, and <i>t</i>-tests, taking into account housing features and service use. Three PSH resident profiles were found. Profile 1 residents (22% of the sample) had low QoL and CI, were younger, and had major social and health issues and unmet needs. Showing moderate QoL and CI, Profile 2 residents (27%) were more educated, had little foster care history, were older on their first homelessness episode, and had few co-occurring MD-SUD. Profile 3 residents (51%) had the best QoL and CI and mostly included men with little education, affected by co-occurring MD-SUD and satisfied with services. More intensive housing support and care coordination may be recommended for Profile 1 PSH residents in response to their diverse needs. Work integration may be beneficial to Profile 2 residents, with programs such as Individual Placement and Support, along with increased rehabilitation activities. A better integration of MD-SUD treatments may be promoted for Profile 3 residents. Considering most PSH residents had multiple health issues and unmet needs, satisfaction with care could be monitored better, as it was found to be a key variable in measuring care adequation.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health & Social Care in the Community\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/5582411\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health & Social Care in the Community\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/5582411\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/5582411","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
永久支持性住房(Permanent supportive housing,PSH)是西方国家提倡的消除无家可归现象的主要方法。考虑到永久支持性住房的住户并不是一个同质群体,他们的生活质量(QoL)和社区融合(CI)在这种环境下可能会有所不同,因此,加深对这些住户特征的了解可能有助于利益相关者制定明智的建议,以改善永久支持性住房。本研究根据 PSH 居民的 QoL、CI 以及社会人口和临床特征确定了他们的特征,并将这些特征与住房特点和服务使用情况联系起来。2020-2022 年,研究人员在蒙特利尔(加拿大)共招募了 308 名 PSH 居民。进行了结构化访谈。通过聚类分析得出了 PSH 居民的概况,随后使用卡方检验、费雪检验和 t 检验对这些概况进行了比较,并考虑了住房特征和服务使用情况。结果发现有三种私营安老院居民概况。特征 1 居民(占样本的 22%)的 QoL 和 CI 较低,年龄较轻,有重大的社会和健康问题以及未满足的需求。特征 2 居民(27%)的 QoL 和 CI 处于中等水平,受教育程度较高,几乎没有寄养史,第一次无家可归时年龄较大,很少并发 MD-SUD。特征 3 居民(51%)的 QoL 和 CI 最好,他们大多是教育程度不高的男性,受到并发 MD-SUD 的影响,对服务感到满意。针对第一类 PSH 居民的不同需求,建议为他们提供更密集的住房支持和护理协调服务。通过 "个人安置和支持 "等计划以及更多的康复活动,将工作与生活结合起来可能对 "概况 2 "类住户有益。对于特征 3 的住户,可促进他们更好地接受 MD-SUD 治疗。考虑到大多数 PSH 居民都有多种健康问题和未满足的需求,可以更好地监测他们对护理服务的满意度,因为满意度是衡量护理服务是否充足的一个关键变量。
Profiles of Permanent Supportive Housing Residents Related to Their Quality of Life and Community Integration
Permanent supportive housing (PSH) is the main approach advocated in Western countries for eradicating homelessness. Considering that PSH residents are not a homogeneous group and that their quality of life (QoL) and community integration (CI) might differ in this setting, improving our understanding of these residents’ profiles may help stakeholders formulate informed recommendations to improve PSH. This study identified PSH resident profiles based on their QoL, CI, and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and associated these profiles with housing features and service use. A total of 308 PSH residents were recruited in Montreal (Canada) in 2020–2022. Structured interviews were conducted. PSH resident profiles were produced with cluster analysis and subsequently compared using chi-square, Fisher’s, and t-tests, taking into account housing features and service use. Three PSH resident profiles were found. Profile 1 residents (22% of the sample) had low QoL and CI, were younger, and had major social and health issues and unmet needs. Showing moderate QoL and CI, Profile 2 residents (27%) were more educated, had little foster care history, were older on their first homelessness episode, and had few co-occurring MD-SUD. Profile 3 residents (51%) had the best QoL and CI and mostly included men with little education, affected by co-occurring MD-SUD and satisfied with services. More intensive housing support and care coordination may be recommended for Profile 1 PSH residents in response to their diverse needs. Work integration may be beneficial to Profile 2 residents, with programs such as Individual Placement and Support, along with increased rehabilitation activities. A better integration of MD-SUD treatments may be promoted for Profile 3 residents. Considering most PSH residents had multiple health issues and unmet needs, satisfaction with care could be monitored better, as it was found to be a key variable in measuring care adequation.
期刊介绍:
Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues