影响患有不可逆牙髓炎的成熟恒牙治疗决定的因素:一项基于问卷的研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Y Alfaisal, G Idris, O A Peters, C I Peters, S Zafar
{"title":"影响患有不可逆牙髓炎的成熟恒牙治疗决定的因素:一项基于问卷的研究。","authors":"Y Alfaisal, G Idris, O A Peters, C I Peters, S Zafar","doi":"10.1111/adj.13026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Decision-making in dentistry is a complex process, and this study evaluated factors that influence dentists' approaches in permanent mature teeth with irreversible pulpitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online questionnaire was distributed to a group of dental practitioners. The questionnaire surveyed dentists' opinions about the management of vital permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis including a case scenario.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 262 respondents were analysed. Barriers to perform vital pulp therapy (VPT) included presuming it an inappropriate long-term treatment (29.7%), lack of knowledge, insufficient access to materials, inadequate training and lack of confidence. Patient's preference (79.44%) and tooth restorability (91%) were the most frequently reported factors influencing treatment decisions. Dentists aged 25-35 years and who have 1-5 years of experience ranked extraction as a more successful treatment (P = 0.008; P = 0.003, respectively). Non-Australian graduates ranked pulpotomy to be a more successful procedure (P = 0.007), and public sector/hospital practitioners favoured extraction more than practitioners from other sectors (P = 0.003). Postgraduates/specialists preferred pulpotomy (P = 0.012) more than general dentists. Participants' clinical approaches for the management of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: root canal treatment (45.0%), indirect pulp capping (22.9%), direct pulp capping (15.8%), pulpotomy (17.1%) and extraction (6.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Female, more experienced, overseas-educated dentists and endodontists preferred VPT for irreversible pulpitis in permanent mature teeth more than other participants. © 2024 Australian Dental Association.</p>","PeriodicalId":8593,"journal":{"name":"Australian dental journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors influencing treatment decisions in permanent mature teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a questionnaire-based study.\",\"authors\":\"Y Alfaisal, G Idris, O A Peters, C I Peters, S Zafar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/adj.13026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Decision-making in dentistry is a complex process, and this study evaluated factors that influence dentists' approaches in permanent mature teeth with irreversible pulpitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online questionnaire was distributed to a group of dental practitioners. The questionnaire surveyed dentists' opinions about the management of vital permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis including a case scenario.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 262 respondents were analysed. Barriers to perform vital pulp therapy (VPT) included presuming it an inappropriate long-term treatment (29.7%), lack of knowledge, insufficient access to materials, inadequate training and lack of confidence. Patient's preference (79.44%) and tooth restorability (91%) were the most frequently reported factors influencing treatment decisions. Dentists aged 25-35 years and who have 1-5 years of experience ranked extraction as a more successful treatment (P = 0.008; P = 0.003, respectively). Non-Australian graduates ranked pulpotomy to be a more successful procedure (P = 0.007), and public sector/hospital practitioners favoured extraction more than practitioners from other sectors (P = 0.003). Postgraduates/specialists preferred pulpotomy (P = 0.012) more than general dentists. Participants' clinical approaches for the management of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: root canal treatment (45.0%), indirect pulp capping (22.9%), direct pulp capping (15.8%), pulpotomy (17.1%) and extraction (6.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Female, more experienced, overseas-educated dentists and endodontists preferred VPT for irreversible pulpitis in permanent mature teeth more than other participants. © 2024 Australian Dental Association.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian dental journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian dental journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.13026\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.13026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:牙科决策是一个复杂的过程:牙科决策是一个复杂的过程,本研究评估了影响牙科医生对患有不可逆牙髓炎的恒牙进行治疗的因素:方法:向一组牙科医生发放了一份在线问卷。该问卷调查了牙科医生对患有不可逆牙髓炎的重要恒牙的处理方法的意见,包括一个案例情景:结果:对 262 名受访者的数据进行了分析。进行牙髓治疗(VPT)的障碍包括认为这是一种不适当的长期治疗方法(29.7%)、缺乏知识、无法获得足够的材料、培训不足以及缺乏信心。患者的偏好(79.44%)和牙齿的可修复性(91%)是影响治疗决定的最常见因素。25-35 岁和有 1-5 年经验的牙医认为拔牙是更成功的治疗方法(P = 0.008;P = 0.003)。非澳大利亚籍毕业生认为牙髓切断术是更成功的治疗方法(P = 0.007),公共部门/医院的从业人员比其他行业的从业人员更倾向于拔牙(P = 0.003)。研究生/专科医生比普通牙科医生更喜欢牙髓切断术(P = 0.012)。参与者治疗无症状不可逆牙髓炎的临床方法:根管治疗(45.0%)、间接盖髓(22.9%)、直接盖髓(15.8%)、牙髓切断术(17.1%)和拔牙(6.3%):与其他参与者相比,女性、更有经验、接受过海外教育的牙科医生和牙髓病学家更倾向于采用VPT治疗恒成熟牙的不可逆牙髓炎。© 2024 澳大利亚牙科协会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors influencing treatment decisions in permanent mature teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a questionnaire-based study.

Background: Decision-making in dentistry is a complex process, and this study evaluated factors that influence dentists' approaches in permanent mature teeth with irreversible pulpitis.

Methods: An online questionnaire was distributed to a group of dental practitioners. The questionnaire surveyed dentists' opinions about the management of vital permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis including a case scenario.

Results: Data from 262 respondents were analysed. Barriers to perform vital pulp therapy (VPT) included presuming it an inappropriate long-term treatment (29.7%), lack of knowledge, insufficient access to materials, inadequate training and lack of confidence. Patient's preference (79.44%) and tooth restorability (91%) were the most frequently reported factors influencing treatment decisions. Dentists aged 25-35 years and who have 1-5 years of experience ranked extraction as a more successful treatment (P = 0.008; P = 0.003, respectively). Non-Australian graduates ranked pulpotomy to be a more successful procedure (P = 0.007), and public sector/hospital practitioners favoured extraction more than practitioners from other sectors (P = 0.003). Postgraduates/specialists preferred pulpotomy (P = 0.012) more than general dentists. Participants' clinical approaches for the management of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: root canal treatment (45.0%), indirect pulp capping (22.9%), direct pulp capping (15.8%), pulpotomy (17.1%) and extraction (6.3%).

Conclusions: Female, more experienced, overseas-educated dentists and endodontists preferred VPT for irreversible pulpitis in permanent mature teeth more than other participants. © 2024 Australian Dental Association.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian dental journal
Australian dental journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
50
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Dental Journal provides a forum for the exchange of information about new and significant research in dentistry, promoting the discipline of dentistry in Australia and throughout the world. It comprises peer-reviewed research articles as its core material, supplemented by reviews, theoretical articles, special features and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信