REGARDS 群体中居住在食物沙漠人口普查区与坚持饮食模式之间的关系。

Food and public health Pub Date : 2018-01-01
Marquita S Gray, Sindhu Lakkur, Virginia J Howard, Keith Pearson, James M Shikany, Monika Safford, Orlando M Gutiérrez, Natalie Colabianchi, Suzanne E Judd
{"title":"REGARDS 群体中居住在食物沙漠人口普查区与坚持饮食模式之间的关系。","authors":"Marquita S Gray, Sindhu Lakkur, Virginia J Howard, Keith Pearson, James M Shikany, Monika Safford, Orlando M Gutiérrez, Natalie Colabianchi, Suzanne E Judd","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increased interest in determining areas in need of improved food access led the U.S Department of Agriculture (USDA) to define food desert census tracts; however, no nationwide studies have compared dietary patterns in food desert tracts to other tracts. Our objective was to examine dietary patterns in residents of food desert and non-food desert census tracts. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 19,179 participants in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study enrolled January 2003-October 2007. We used participants' geocoded address with USDA Food Desert Locator to identify food deserts and multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) to calculate adherence to Southern, Plant-based, and Mediterranean dietary patterns. Odds of adherence to the Southern dietary pattern were higher among white high school graduates (OR=1.41; 95% CI: 1.20-1.67), white college graduates (OR=1.91; 95% CI: 1.55-2.35) and black college graduates (OR=1.38; 95% CI: 1.14-1.68) who reside in a food desert versus non-food desert. Odds of adherence to the Plant-based dietary pattern were 15% lower among non-southeastern residents (OR=0.85; 95% CI: 0.72-0.99), who reside in food desert versus non-food desert. No statistically significant differences were observed for the Mediterranean dietary pattern. Residents living in food deserts had lower adherence to healthy dietary pattern than residents not living in food deserts; the association may vary by race, education, and region.</p>","PeriodicalId":519935,"journal":{"name":"Food and public health","volume":"8 4","pages":"79-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6714990/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Association between Residence in a Food Desert Census Tract and Adherence to Dietary Patterns in the REGARDS Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Marquita S Gray, Sindhu Lakkur, Virginia J Howard, Keith Pearson, James M Shikany, Monika Safford, Orlando M Gutiérrez, Natalie Colabianchi, Suzanne E Judd\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Increased interest in determining areas in need of improved food access led the U.S Department of Agriculture (USDA) to define food desert census tracts; however, no nationwide studies have compared dietary patterns in food desert tracts to other tracts. Our objective was to examine dietary patterns in residents of food desert and non-food desert census tracts. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 19,179 participants in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study enrolled January 2003-October 2007. We used participants' geocoded address with USDA Food Desert Locator to identify food deserts and multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) to calculate adherence to Southern, Plant-based, and Mediterranean dietary patterns. Odds of adherence to the Southern dietary pattern were higher among white high school graduates (OR=1.41; 95% CI: 1.20-1.67), white college graduates (OR=1.91; 95% CI: 1.55-2.35) and black college graduates (OR=1.38; 95% CI: 1.14-1.68) who reside in a food desert versus non-food desert. Odds of adherence to the Plant-based dietary pattern were 15% lower among non-southeastern residents (OR=0.85; 95% CI: 0.72-0.99), who reside in food desert versus non-food desert. No statistically significant differences were observed for the Mediterranean dietary pattern. Residents living in food deserts had lower adherence to healthy dietary pattern than residents not living in food deserts; the association may vary by race, education, and region.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food and public health\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"79-85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6714990/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food and public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国农业部(USDA)对确定需要改善食物获取的地区越来越感兴趣,因此定义了食物沙漠普查区;但是,还没有全国性的研究将食物沙漠普查区的饮食模式与其他普查区进行比较。我们的目标是研究食物沙漠普查区和非食物沙漠普查区居民的饮食模式。我们对 2003 年 1 月至 2007 年 10 月参加 "中风的地理和种族差异原因研究"(REGARDS)的 19179 名参与者进行了横断面分析。我们使用美国农业部食品沙漠定位器对参与者的地址进行地理编码,以确定食品沙漠,并使用多变量调整后的几率比(ORs)来计算南方饮食模式、植物性饮食模式和地中海饮食模式的坚持率。与非食物沙漠相比,居住在食物沙漠的白人高中毕业生(OR=1.41;95% CI:1.20-1.67)、白人大学毕业生(OR=1.91;95% CI:1.55-2.35)和黑人大学毕业生(OR=1.38;95% CI:1.14-1.68)坚持南方饮食模式的几率更高。居住在食物沙漠与非食物沙漠的非东南部居民坚持植物性饮食模式的几率低 15%(OR=0.85;95% CI:0.72-0.99)。在地中海饮食模式方面,没有观察到有统计学意义的差异。与非食物沙漠地区的居民相比,食物沙漠地区的居民对健康饮食模式的坚持程度较低;这种关联可能因种族、教育程度和地区而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Association between Residence in a Food Desert Census Tract and Adherence to Dietary Patterns in the REGARDS Cohort.

Increased interest in determining areas in need of improved food access led the U.S Department of Agriculture (USDA) to define food desert census tracts; however, no nationwide studies have compared dietary patterns in food desert tracts to other tracts. Our objective was to examine dietary patterns in residents of food desert and non-food desert census tracts. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 19,179 participants in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study enrolled January 2003-October 2007. We used participants' geocoded address with USDA Food Desert Locator to identify food deserts and multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) to calculate adherence to Southern, Plant-based, and Mediterranean dietary patterns. Odds of adherence to the Southern dietary pattern were higher among white high school graduates (OR=1.41; 95% CI: 1.20-1.67), white college graduates (OR=1.91; 95% CI: 1.55-2.35) and black college graduates (OR=1.38; 95% CI: 1.14-1.68) who reside in a food desert versus non-food desert. Odds of adherence to the Plant-based dietary pattern were 15% lower among non-southeastern residents (OR=0.85; 95% CI: 0.72-0.99), who reside in food desert versus non-food desert. No statistically significant differences were observed for the Mediterranean dietary pattern. Residents living in food deserts had lower adherence to healthy dietary pattern than residents not living in food deserts; the association may vary by race, education, and region.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信