闭合切口负压疗法与腹部闭合切口标准护理在减少手术部位并发症方面的比较:比较研究的系统回顾和元分析》。

Eplasty Pub Date : 2024-05-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Christopher Mantyh, Ronald Silverman, Ashley Collinsworth, Christine Bongards, Leah Griffin
{"title":"闭合切口负压疗法与腹部闭合切口标准护理在减少手术部位并发症方面的比较:比较研究的系统回顾和元分析》。","authors":"Christopher Mantyh, Ronald Silverman, Ashley Collinsworth, Christine Bongards, Leah Griffin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical site complications (SSCs) pose a significant risk to patients, potentially leading to severe consequences or even loss of life. While previous research has shown that closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) can reduce wound complications in various surgical fields, its effectiveness in abdominal incisions remains uncertain. To address this gap, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the impact of ciNPT on postsurgical outcomes and health care utilization in patients undergoing open abdominal surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search using PubMed, EMBASE, and QUOSA was performed for publications written in English, comparing ciNPT with standard of care dressings for patients undergoing abdominal surgical procedures between January 2005 and August 2021. Characteristics of study participants, surgical procedures, dressings used, duration of treatment, postsurgical outcomes, and follow-up data were extracted. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. Dichotomous outcomes were summarized using risk ratios and continuous outcomes were assessed using mean differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search identified 22 studies for inclusion in the analysis. Significant reductions in relative risk (RR) of SSC (RR: 0.568, <i>P</i> = .003), surgical site infection (SSI) (RR: 0.512, <i>P</i> < .001), superficial SSI (RR: 0.373, <i>P</i> < .001), deep SSI (RR: 0.368, <i>P</i> =.033), and dehiscence (RR: 0.581, <i>P</i> = .042) were associated with ciNPT use. ciNPT use was also associated with a reduced risk of readmission and a 2.6-day reduction in hospital length of stay (<i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicate that use of ciNPT in patients undergoing open abdominal procedures can help reduce SSCs and associated hospital length of stay as well as readmissions.A previous version of this abstract was presented at the 2023 Conference of the European Wound Management Association (EWMA) in Milan, Italy and posted online at the site listed below. EWMA permits abstracts to be republished with the complete manuscript. https://journals.cambridgemedia.com.au/application/files/9116/8920/7316/JWM_Abstracts_LR.pdf.</p>","PeriodicalId":93993,"journal":{"name":"Eplasty","volume":"24 ","pages":"e33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11155374/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Versus Standard of Care Over Closed Abdominal Incisions in the Reduction of Surgical Site Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Mantyh, Ronald Silverman, Ashley Collinsworth, Christine Bongards, Leah Griffin\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical site complications (SSCs) pose a significant risk to patients, potentially leading to severe consequences or even loss of life. While previous research has shown that closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) can reduce wound complications in various surgical fields, its effectiveness in abdominal incisions remains uncertain. To address this gap, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the impact of ciNPT on postsurgical outcomes and health care utilization in patients undergoing open abdominal surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search using PubMed, EMBASE, and QUOSA was performed for publications written in English, comparing ciNPT with standard of care dressings for patients undergoing abdominal surgical procedures between January 2005 and August 2021. Characteristics of study participants, surgical procedures, dressings used, duration of treatment, postsurgical outcomes, and follow-up data were extracted. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. Dichotomous outcomes were summarized using risk ratios and continuous outcomes were assessed using mean differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search identified 22 studies for inclusion in the analysis. Significant reductions in relative risk (RR) of SSC (RR: 0.568, <i>P</i> = .003), surgical site infection (SSI) (RR: 0.512, <i>P</i> < .001), superficial SSI (RR: 0.373, <i>P</i> < .001), deep SSI (RR: 0.368, <i>P</i> =.033), and dehiscence (RR: 0.581, <i>P</i> = .042) were associated with ciNPT use. ciNPT use was also associated with a reduced risk of readmission and a 2.6-day reduction in hospital length of stay (<i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicate that use of ciNPT in patients undergoing open abdominal procedures can help reduce SSCs and associated hospital length of stay as well as readmissions.A previous version of this abstract was presented at the 2023 Conference of the European Wound Management Association (EWMA) in Milan, Italy and posted online at the site listed below. EWMA permits abstracts to be republished with the complete manuscript. https://journals.cambridgemedia.com.au/application/files/9116/8920/7316/JWM_Abstracts_LR.pdf.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eplasty\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"e33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11155374/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:手术部位并发症(SSCs)对患者构成重大风险,可能导致严重后果甚至丧失生命。以往的研究表明,闭合切口负压疗法(ciNPT)可减少各种手术领域的伤口并发症,但其对腹部切口的疗效仍不确定。为了填补这一空白,我们进行了一项系统性综述和荟萃分析,以评估闭合切口负压疗法对腹部开刀手术患者术后效果和医疗服务利用率的影响:使用PubMed、EMBASE和QUOSA对2005年1月至2021年8月期间的英文文献进行了系统性检索,比较了ciNPT与腹部手术患者标准护理敷料。研究人员提取了研究参与者的特征、手术方法、使用的敷料、治疗时间、术后效果和随访数据。采用随机效应模型进行元分析。二分结果采用风险比进行总结,连续结果采用平均差进行评估:文献检索确定了 22 项纳入分析的研究。SSC(RR:0.568,P = .003)、手术部位感染(SSI)(RR:0.512,P < .001)、浅表 SSI(RR:0.373,P < .001)、深部 SSI(RR:0.368,P =.使用 ciNPT 还降低了再入院风险,缩短了 2.6 天的住院时间(P < .001):这些研究结果表明,在接受开腹手术的患者中使用 ciNPT 有助于减少 SSC 和相关的住院时间以及再入院率。本摘要的前一版本已在意大利米兰举行的欧洲伤口管理协会 (EWMA) 2023 年会议上发表,并在以下网站在线发布。欧洲伤口管理协会允许摘要与完整手稿一起重新发表。https://journals.cambridgemedia.com.au/application/files/9116/8920/7316/JWM_Abstracts_LR.pdf。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Versus Standard of Care Over Closed Abdominal Incisions in the Reduction of Surgical Site Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

Background: Surgical site complications (SSCs) pose a significant risk to patients, potentially leading to severe consequences or even loss of life. While previous research has shown that closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) can reduce wound complications in various surgical fields, its effectiveness in abdominal incisions remains uncertain. To address this gap, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the impact of ciNPT on postsurgical outcomes and health care utilization in patients undergoing open abdominal surgeries.

Methods: A systematic literature search using PubMed, EMBASE, and QUOSA was performed for publications written in English, comparing ciNPT with standard of care dressings for patients undergoing abdominal surgical procedures between January 2005 and August 2021. Characteristics of study participants, surgical procedures, dressings used, duration of treatment, postsurgical outcomes, and follow-up data were extracted. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. Dichotomous outcomes were summarized using risk ratios and continuous outcomes were assessed using mean differences.

Results: The literature search identified 22 studies for inclusion in the analysis. Significant reductions in relative risk (RR) of SSC (RR: 0.568, P = .003), surgical site infection (SSI) (RR: 0.512, P < .001), superficial SSI (RR: 0.373, P < .001), deep SSI (RR: 0.368, P =.033), and dehiscence (RR: 0.581, P = .042) were associated with ciNPT use. ciNPT use was also associated with a reduced risk of readmission and a 2.6-day reduction in hospital length of stay (P < .001).

Conclusions: These findings indicate that use of ciNPT in patients undergoing open abdominal procedures can help reduce SSCs and associated hospital length of stay as well as readmissions.A previous version of this abstract was presented at the 2023 Conference of the European Wound Management Association (EWMA) in Milan, Italy and posted online at the site listed below. EWMA permits abstracts to be republished with the complete manuscript. https://journals.cambridgemedia.com.au/application/files/9116/8920/7316/JWM_Abstracts_LR.pdf.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信