Jingjing Lian, Yingjie Ji, Tao Chen, Guoxiang Wang, Mizhu Wang, Shengxi Li, Jia Cao, Li Shen, Wei Lu, Meidong Xu
{"title":"食管胃肠道间质瘤的内窥镜切除术:一项多中心可行性研究。","authors":"Jingjing Lian, Yingjie Ji, Tao Chen, Guoxiang Wang, Mizhu Wang, Shengxi Li, Jia Cao, Li Shen, Wei Lu, Meidong Xu","doi":"10.1177/17562848241255304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (E-GISTs) are highly uncommon and have not been thoroughly examined.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this multi-center study was to assess the viability of endoscopic resection (ER) in the treatment of E-GISTs and to explore its clinical implications.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a multi-center retrospective study. Consecutive patients referred to the four participating centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>E-GISTs among the consecutive subepithelial tumors (SETs) treated by ER methods were enrolled from April 2019 to August 2022. Clinicopathological, endoscopic, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 23 patients with E-GISTs were included for analysis, accounting for 1.9% of all the esophageal SETs (1243 patients). The average size of the tumor lesions was 2.3 cm (range 1.0-4.0 cm). We observed that tumors larger than 2.0 cm were more likely to grow deeper, with a statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <i>End bloc</i> resection was achieved in all 23 patients. The mean operation time was 53.6 min (range 25-111 min). One patient experienced significant intraoperative bleeding, which was promptly managed endoscopically without necessitating surgery. The average hospital stay was 4.5 days (range 3-8 days). The overall median follow-up period was 31 months (range 13-47 months). No tumor recurrence, residual tumor, distal metastasis, or death was observed during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on our limited data, our study indicates that ER may be a feasible and effective option for treating esophageal GISTs measuring 4 cm or less. We suggest submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection as the preferred approach, as all E-GISTs in our study were situated in the muscularis propria layer. Additionally, tumors larger than 2 cm were more prone to deeper growth or extraluminal extension.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11155357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic resection for esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multi-center feasibility study.\",\"authors\":\"Jingjing Lian, Yingjie Ji, Tao Chen, Guoxiang Wang, Mizhu Wang, Shengxi Li, Jia Cao, Li Shen, Wei Lu, Meidong Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17562848241255304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (E-GISTs) are highly uncommon and have not been thoroughly examined.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this multi-center study was to assess the viability of endoscopic resection (ER) in the treatment of E-GISTs and to explore its clinical implications.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a multi-center retrospective study. Consecutive patients referred to the four participating centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>E-GISTs among the consecutive subepithelial tumors (SETs) treated by ER methods were enrolled from April 2019 to August 2022. Clinicopathological, endoscopic, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 23 patients with E-GISTs were included for analysis, accounting for 1.9% of all the esophageal SETs (1243 patients). The average size of the tumor lesions was 2.3 cm (range 1.0-4.0 cm). We observed that tumors larger than 2.0 cm were more likely to grow deeper, with a statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <i>End bloc</i> resection was achieved in all 23 patients. The mean operation time was 53.6 min (range 25-111 min). One patient experienced significant intraoperative bleeding, which was promptly managed endoscopically without necessitating surgery. The average hospital stay was 4.5 days (range 3-8 days). The overall median follow-up period was 31 months (range 13-47 months). No tumor recurrence, residual tumor, distal metastasis, or death was observed during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on our limited data, our study indicates that ER may be a feasible and effective option for treating esophageal GISTs measuring 4 cm or less. We suggest submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection as the preferred approach, as all E-GISTs in our study were situated in the muscularis propria layer. Additionally, tumors larger than 2 cm were more prone to deeper growth or extraluminal extension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11155357/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848241255304\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848241255304","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
Endoscopic resection for esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multi-center feasibility study.
Background: Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (E-GISTs) are highly uncommon and have not been thoroughly examined.
Objectives: The objective of this multi-center study was to assess the viability of endoscopic resection (ER) in the treatment of E-GISTs and to explore its clinical implications.
Design: This was a multi-center retrospective study. Consecutive patients referred to the four participating centers.
Methods: E-GISTs among the consecutive subepithelial tumors (SETs) treated by ER methods were enrolled from April 2019 to August 2022. Clinicopathological, endoscopic, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed.
Results: A total of 23 patients with E-GISTs were included for analysis, accounting for 1.9% of all the esophageal SETs (1243 patients). The average size of the tumor lesions was 2.3 cm (range 1.0-4.0 cm). We observed that tumors larger than 2.0 cm were more likely to grow deeper, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). End bloc resection was achieved in all 23 patients. The mean operation time was 53.6 min (range 25-111 min). One patient experienced significant intraoperative bleeding, which was promptly managed endoscopically without necessitating surgery. The average hospital stay was 4.5 days (range 3-8 days). The overall median follow-up period was 31 months (range 13-47 months). No tumor recurrence, residual tumor, distal metastasis, or death was observed during the follow-up period.
Conclusion: Based on our limited data, our study indicates that ER may be a feasible and effective option for treating esophageal GISTs measuring 4 cm or less. We suggest submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection as the preferred approach, as all E-GISTs in our study were situated in the muscularis propria layer. Additionally, tumors larger than 2 cm were more prone to deeper growth or extraluminal extension.