硬膜外注射类固醇治疗椎间盘相关性坐骨神经痛的预后因素:德尔菲共识研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
European Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-07 DOI:10.1007/s00586-024-08342-2
Siobhan Stynes, Nadine Foster, John O' Dowd, Raymond Ostelo, Kika Konstantinou
{"title":"硬膜外注射类固醇治疗椎间盘相关性坐骨神经痛的预后因素:德尔菲共识研究。","authors":"Siobhan Stynes, Nadine Foster, John O' Dowd, Raymond Ostelo, Kika Konstantinou","doi":"10.1007/s00586-024-08342-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Trial data shows modest reductions in leg pain, disability and surgery avoidance following epidural steroid injections (ESI) for severe sciatica. Despite their common use, there is no clear evidence about which patients are more likely to benefit from ESI. The aim of this study was to generate consensus on potential predictors of outcome following ESI for disc-related sciatica.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A list of potential predictors of outcome was generated during a consensus meeting of seven experts. The items were subsequently presented in a two round on-line Delphi study to generate consensus among experts on which items are potential predictors of outcome. Consensus was defined as 70% agreement among participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one items were generated during the consensus meeting. Of ninety experts invited to participate in the on-line Delphi study, 44 (48%) and 33 (73%) took part in rounds one and two respectively. Twenty-eight additional items suggested by participants in round one were included in round two. Overall, 14 items reached consensus reflecting domains of health, medication use, pain intensity, psychosocial factors, imaging findings and type of injection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on expert consensus, items that can be routinely collected in clinical practice were identified as potential predictors of outcomes following ESI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"4235-4242"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of outcome following an epidural steroid injection for disc-related sciatica: a Delphi consensus study.\",\"authors\":\"Siobhan Stynes, Nadine Foster, John O' Dowd, Raymond Ostelo, Kika Konstantinou\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00586-024-08342-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Trial data shows modest reductions in leg pain, disability and surgery avoidance following epidural steroid injections (ESI) for severe sciatica. Despite their common use, there is no clear evidence about which patients are more likely to benefit from ESI. The aim of this study was to generate consensus on potential predictors of outcome following ESI for disc-related sciatica.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A list of potential predictors of outcome was generated during a consensus meeting of seven experts. The items were subsequently presented in a two round on-line Delphi study to generate consensus among experts on which items are potential predictors of outcome. Consensus was defined as 70% agreement among participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one items were generated during the consensus meeting. Of ninety experts invited to participate in the on-line Delphi study, 44 (48%) and 33 (73%) took part in rounds one and two respectively. Twenty-eight additional items suggested by participants in round one were included in round two. Overall, 14 items reached consensus reflecting domains of health, medication use, pain intensity, psychosocial factors, imaging findings and type of injection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on expert consensus, items that can be routinely collected in clinical practice were identified as potential predictors of outcomes following ESI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4235-4242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08342-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08342-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:试验数据显示,对严重坐骨神经痛患者进行硬膜外类固醇注射(ESI)后,腿部疼痛、残疾程度和手术避免率都略有降低。尽管硬膜外类固醇注射很常见,但目前还没有明确的证据表明哪些患者更有可能从硬膜外类固醇注射中获益。本研究旨在就椎间盘相关坐骨神经痛ESI术后疗效的潜在预测因素达成共识:方法:七位专家在一次共识会议上提出了一份潜在疗效预测因素清单。随后,这些项目被提交到两轮在线德尔菲研究中,以便专家们就哪些项目是潜在的预后指标达成共识。与会者达成 70% 的一致即为共识:结果:在共识会议期间产生了 61 个项目。在受邀参加在线德尔菲研究的 90 位专家中,分别有 44 位(48%)和 33 位(73%)参加了第一轮和第二轮研究。第一轮参与者提出的另外 28 个项目被纳入了第二轮。总体而言,有 14 个项目达成了共识,反映了健康、药物使用、疼痛强度、社会心理因素、影像学检查结果和注射类型等领域:根据专家共识,确定了可在临床实践中常规收集的项目,作为预测 ESI 后果的潜在指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Predictors of outcome following an epidural steroid injection for disc-related sciatica: a Delphi consensus study.

Predictors of outcome following an epidural steroid injection for disc-related sciatica: a Delphi consensus study.

Purpose: Trial data shows modest reductions in leg pain, disability and surgery avoidance following epidural steroid injections (ESI) for severe sciatica. Despite their common use, there is no clear evidence about which patients are more likely to benefit from ESI. The aim of this study was to generate consensus on potential predictors of outcome following ESI for disc-related sciatica.

Methods: A list of potential predictors of outcome was generated during a consensus meeting of seven experts. The items were subsequently presented in a two round on-line Delphi study to generate consensus among experts on which items are potential predictors of outcome. Consensus was defined as 70% agreement among participants.

Results: Sixty-one items were generated during the consensus meeting. Of ninety experts invited to participate in the on-line Delphi study, 44 (48%) and 33 (73%) took part in rounds one and two respectively. Twenty-eight additional items suggested by participants in round one were included in round two. Overall, 14 items reached consensus reflecting domains of health, medication use, pain intensity, psychosocial factors, imaging findings and type of injection.

Conclusion: Based on expert consensus, items that can be routinely collected in clinical practice were identified as potential predictors of outcomes following ESI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信