以质子为基础的食管细胞癌确定性化放疗与手术治疗的比较:一项多中心回顾性日本队列研究。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Esophagus Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1007/s10388-024-01068-6
Koichi Ogawa, Hitoshi Ishikawa, Takeshi Toyozumi, Kazuhiro Noma, Koji Kono, Hidehiro Hojo, Hiroyasu Tamamura, Yusuke Azami, Toshiki Ishida, Yoshihiro Nabeya, Hiromitsu Iwata, Masayuki Araya, Sunao Tokumaru, Kazushi Maruo, Tatsuya Oda, Hisahiro Matsubara
{"title":"以质子为基础的食管细胞癌确定性化放疗与手术治疗的比较:一项多中心回顾性日本队列研究。","authors":"Koichi Ogawa, Hitoshi Ishikawa, Takeshi Toyozumi, Kazuhiro Noma, Koji Kono, Hidehiro Hojo, Hiroyasu Tamamura, Yusuke Azami, Toshiki Ishida, Yoshihiro Nabeya, Hiromitsu Iwata, Masayuki Araya, Sunao Tokumaru, Kazushi Maruo, Tatsuya Oda, Hisahiro Matsubara","doi":"10.1007/s10388-024-01068-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proton-based, definitive chemoradiotherapy (P-CRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) previously showed comparable survival outcomes with the surgery-based therapy, i.e., neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy (NAC-S), in a single-institutional study. This study aimed to validate this message in a Japanese multicenter study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven Japanese esophageal cancer specialty hospitals have participated. A total of 518 cases with clinical Stage I-IVA ESCC between 2010 and 2019, including 168 P-CRT and 350 NAC-S patients, were enrolled and long-term outcomes were evaluated. Propensity-score weighting analyses with overlap weighting for confounding adjustment were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 3-year overall survival (OS) of the P-CRT group was equivalent to the NAC-S group (74.8% vs. 72.7%, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-1.25). Although, the 3-year P-CRT group progression-free survival (PFS) was inferior to the NAC-S group (51.4% vs. 59.6%, HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.04-1.85), the progression P-CRT group cases showed better survival than the NAC-S group (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.88), largely because of salvage surgery or endoscopic submucosal dissection for local progression. The survival advantage of P-CRT over NAC-S was more pronounced in the cT1-2 (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.29-1.26) and cStage I-II (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.24-1.07) subgroups, although this trend was not evident in other populations, such as cT3-4 and cStage III-IVA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Proton-based CRT for ESCC showed equivalent OS to surgery-based therapy. Especially for patients with cT1-2 and cStage I-II disease, proton-based CRT has the potential to serve as a first-line treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11918,"journal":{"name":"Esophagus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of proton-based definitive chemoradiotherapy and surgery-based therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multi-center retrospective Japanese cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Koichi Ogawa, Hitoshi Ishikawa, Takeshi Toyozumi, Kazuhiro Noma, Koji Kono, Hidehiro Hojo, Hiroyasu Tamamura, Yusuke Azami, Toshiki Ishida, Yoshihiro Nabeya, Hiromitsu Iwata, Masayuki Araya, Sunao Tokumaru, Kazushi Maruo, Tatsuya Oda, Hisahiro Matsubara\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10388-024-01068-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proton-based, definitive chemoradiotherapy (P-CRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) previously showed comparable survival outcomes with the surgery-based therapy, i.e., neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy (NAC-S), in a single-institutional study. This study aimed to validate this message in a Japanese multicenter study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven Japanese esophageal cancer specialty hospitals have participated. A total of 518 cases with clinical Stage I-IVA ESCC between 2010 and 2019, including 168 P-CRT and 350 NAC-S patients, were enrolled and long-term outcomes were evaluated. Propensity-score weighting analyses with overlap weighting for confounding adjustment were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 3-year overall survival (OS) of the P-CRT group was equivalent to the NAC-S group (74.8% vs. 72.7%, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-1.25). Although, the 3-year P-CRT group progression-free survival (PFS) was inferior to the NAC-S group (51.4% vs. 59.6%, HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.04-1.85), the progression P-CRT group cases showed better survival than the NAC-S group (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.88), largely because of salvage surgery or endoscopic submucosal dissection for local progression. The survival advantage of P-CRT over NAC-S was more pronounced in the cT1-2 (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.29-1.26) and cStage I-II (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.24-1.07) subgroups, although this trend was not evident in other populations, such as cT3-4 and cStage III-IVA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Proton-based CRT for ESCC showed equivalent OS to surgery-based therapy. Especially for patients with cT1-2 and cStage I-II disease, proton-based CRT has the potential to serve as a first-line treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Esophagus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Esophagus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-024-01068-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-024-01068-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基于质子的食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)确定性化放疗(P-CRT)与基于手术的治疗(即食管切除术(NAC-S)后的新辅助化疗)的生存率相当。本研究旨在通过日本多中心研究验证这一观点:方法:11 家日本食管癌专科医院参与了研究。方法:11 家日本食管癌专科医院参与了这项研究,共纳入了 2010 年至 2019 年期间的 518 例临床 I-IVA 期 ESCC 患者,其中包括 168 例 P-CRT 患者和 350 例 NAC-S 患者,并对其长期预后进行了评估。采用倾向分数加权分析和重叠加权进行混杂因素调整:结果:P-CRT组的3年总生存率(OS)与NAC-S组相当(74.8% vs. 72.7%,危险比[HR]:0.87,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.61-1.25):0.61-1.25).虽然P-CRT组的3年无进展生存期(PFS)不如NAC-S组(51.4% vs. 59.6%,HR 1.39,95% CI 1.04-1.85),但P-CRT组病例的进展生存期优于NAC-S组(HR 0.58,95% CI 0.38-0.88),这主要是因为局部进展时进行了挽救手术或内镜粘膜下剥离术。与NAC-S相比,P-CRT的生存优势在cT1-2(HR 0.61,95% CI 0.29-1.26)和c分期I-II(HR 0.50,95% CI 0.24-1.07)亚组中更为明显,但这一趋势在cT3-4和c分期III-IVA等其他人群中并不明显:结论:基于质子的CRT治疗ESCC的OS与手术治疗相当。结论:质子CRT治疗ESCC的OS与手术治疗相当,尤其是对于cT1-2和c分期为I-II的患者,质子CRT有可能成为一线治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of proton-based definitive chemoradiotherapy and surgery-based therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multi-center retrospective Japanese cohort study.

Comparison of proton-based definitive chemoradiotherapy and surgery-based therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multi-center retrospective Japanese cohort study.

Background: Proton-based, definitive chemoradiotherapy (P-CRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) previously showed comparable survival outcomes with the surgery-based therapy, i.e., neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy (NAC-S), in a single-institutional study. This study aimed to validate this message in a Japanese multicenter study.

Methods: Eleven Japanese esophageal cancer specialty hospitals have participated. A total of 518 cases with clinical Stage I-IVA ESCC between 2010 and 2019, including 168 P-CRT and 350 NAC-S patients, were enrolled and long-term outcomes were evaluated. Propensity-score weighting analyses with overlap weighting for confounding adjustment were used.

Results: The 3-year overall survival (OS) of the P-CRT group was equivalent to the NAC-S group (74.8% vs. 72.7%, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-1.25). Although, the 3-year P-CRT group progression-free survival (PFS) was inferior to the NAC-S group (51.4% vs. 59.6%, HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.04-1.85), the progression P-CRT group cases showed better survival than the NAC-S group (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.88), largely because of salvage surgery or endoscopic submucosal dissection for local progression. The survival advantage of P-CRT over NAC-S was more pronounced in the cT1-2 (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.29-1.26) and cStage I-II (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.24-1.07) subgroups, although this trend was not evident in other populations, such as cT3-4 and cStage III-IVA.

Conclusions: Proton-based CRT for ESCC showed equivalent OS to surgery-based therapy. Especially for patients with cT1-2 and cStage I-II disease, proton-based CRT has the potential to serve as a first-line treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Esophagus
Esophagus GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Esophagus, the official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, introduces practitioners and researchers to significant studies in the fields of benign and malignant diseases of the esophagus. The journal welcomes original articles, review articles, and short articles including technical notes ( How I do it ), which will be peer-reviewed by the editorial board. Letters to the editor are also welcome. Special articles on esophageal diseases will be provided by the editorial board, and proceedings of symposia and workshops will be included in special issues for the Annual Congress of the Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信