使用髓内螺钉和张力带混合结构固定肩胛骨骨折

IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Advances in Orthopedics Pub Date : 2024-05-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/6471544
Kaitlin Rush, John Fisher, Neil Jain, Caleb Gottlich, Cyrus Caroom
{"title":"使用髓内螺钉和张力带混合结构固定肩胛骨骨折","authors":"Kaitlin Rush, John Fisher, Neil Jain, Caleb Gottlich, Cyrus Caroom","doi":"10.1155/2024/6471544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Olecranon fractures are common injuries that require surgical intervention for optimal outcomes. Various fixation methods have been described in the literature, including the use of intramedullary proximal ulna screws in combination with tension band augmentation. Limited research has compared this hybrid technique to other established methods of fixation. This study compared complication and reoperation rates between multiple groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on patients with olecranon fractures who underwent internal fixation at a level 1 trauma center between January 1st, 2013, and April 22nd, 2023. Data was collected using CPT codes, and patients were categorized into five groups based on the method of fixation received: no implant, tension band only, locking olecranon plate, intramedullary screw and tension band hybrid, and others. Variables such as patient demographics, Mayo fracture classification, open vs. closed injury, implant type, reoperation rates, and postoperative complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 217 patients were included in the study. No difference was found with implant choice and reoperation rate (<i>p</i> = 0.461). There was a significant difference found with reoperation and fracture type (<i>p</i> = 0.027) and open fracture (<i>p</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The primary findings of this study indicate no significant difference in implant choice and reoperation rates among the various fixation methods used for olecranon fractures. These findings suggest that the hybrid fixation technique, utilizing intramedullary proximal ulna screws in combination with tension band augmentation, is a viable and comparable treatment option when evaluated against other well-documented methods of fixation. This study also reiterates that severity of initial injury is often the most important factor related to poorer outcomes. Further discussion and analysis of the data will provide a comprehensive understanding of implications and recommendations for olecranon fracture fixation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7358,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Orthopedics","volume":"2024 ","pages":"6471544"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11156510/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fixation of Olecranon Fractures Using a Hybrid Intramedullary Screw and Tension Band Construct.\",\"authors\":\"Kaitlin Rush, John Fisher, Neil Jain, Caleb Gottlich, Cyrus Caroom\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/6471544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Olecranon fractures are common injuries that require surgical intervention for optimal outcomes. Various fixation methods have been described in the literature, including the use of intramedullary proximal ulna screws in combination with tension band augmentation. Limited research has compared this hybrid technique to other established methods of fixation. This study compared complication and reoperation rates between multiple groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on patients with olecranon fractures who underwent internal fixation at a level 1 trauma center between January 1st, 2013, and April 22nd, 2023. Data was collected using CPT codes, and patients were categorized into five groups based on the method of fixation received: no implant, tension band only, locking olecranon plate, intramedullary screw and tension band hybrid, and others. Variables such as patient demographics, Mayo fracture classification, open vs. closed injury, implant type, reoperation rates, and postoperative complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 217 patients were included in the study. No difference was found with implant choice and reoperation rate (<i>p</i> = 0.461). There was a significant difference found with reoperation and fracture type (<i>p</i> = 0.027) and open fracture (<i>p</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The primary findings of this study indicate no significant difference in implant choice and reoperation rates among the various fixation methods used for olecranon fractures. These findings suggest that the hybrid fixation technique, utilizing intramedullary proximal ulna screws in combination with tension band augmentation, is a viable and comparable treatment option when evaluated against other well-documented methods of fixation. This study also reiterates that severity of initial injury is often the most important factor related to poorer outcomes. Further discussion and analysis of the data will provide a comprehensive understanding of implications and recommendations for olecranon fracture fixation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Orthopedics\",\"volume\":\"2024 \",\"pages\":\"6471544\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11156510/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6471544\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6471544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:肩胛骨骨折是一种常见的损伤,需要通过手术治疗才能达到最佳效果。文献中描述了多种固定方法,包括使用髓内尺骨近端螺钉结合张力带增强。将这种混合技术与其他成熟的固定方法进行比较的研究十分有限。本研究比较了多组患者的并发症和再手术率:对2013年1月1日至2023年4月22日期间在一级创伤中心接受内固定治疗的肩胛骨骨折患者进行了回顾性研究。研究人员使用 CPT 编码收集数据,并根据患者接受的固定方法将其分为五组:无植入物、仅张力带、锁定肩胛骨钢板、髓内螺钉和张力带混合型以及其他。记录的变量包括患者人口统计学特征、梅奥骨折分类、开放性损伤与闭合性损伤、植入物类型、再次手术率和术后并发症:结果:共有 217 名患者参与了研究。结果:研究共纳入 217 名患者,在植入物选择和再手术率方面未发现差异(P = 0.461)。再手术率与骨折类型(p = 0.027)和开放性骨折(p = 0.002)存在明显差异:本研究的主要结果表明,用于治疗肩胛骨骨折的各种固定方法在植入物选择和再手术率方面无明显差异。这些研究结果表明,利用尺骨近端髓内螺钉结合张力带加固的混合固定技术是一种可行的、可与其他有据可查的固定方法相媲美的治疗方案。这项研究还重申,初始损伤的严重程度往往是导致较差疗效的最重要因素。对数据的进一步讨论和分析将有助于全面了解肩胛骨骨折固定的意义和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fixation of Olecranon Fractures Using a Hybrid Intramedullary Screw and Tension Band Construct.

Introduction: Olecranon fractures are common injuries that require surgical intervention for optimal outcomes. Various fixation methods have been described in the literature, including the use of intramedullary proximal ulna screws in combination with tension band augmentation. Limited research has compared this hybrid technique to other established methods of fixation. This study compared complication and reoperation rates between multiple groups.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients with olecranon fractures who underwent internal fixation at a level 1 trauma center between January 1st, 2013, and April 22nd, 2023. Data was collected using CPT codes, and patients were categorized into five groups based on the method of fixation received: no implant, tension band only, locking olecranon plate, intramedullary screw and tension band hybrid, and others. Variables such as patient demographics, Mayo fracture classification, open vs. closed injury, implant type, reoperation rates, and postoperative complications were recorded.

Results: A total of 217 patients were included in the study. No difference was found with implant choice and reoperation rate (p = 0.461). There was a significant difference found with reoperation and fracture type (p = 0.027) and open fracture (p = 0.002).

Conclusion: The primary findings of this study indicate no significant difference in implant choice and reoperation rates among the various fixation methods used for olecranon fractures. These findings suggest that the hybrid fixation technique, utilizing intramedullary proximal ulna screws in combination with tension band augmentation, is a viable and comparable treatment option when evaluated against other well-documented methods of fixation. This study also reiterates that severity of initial injury is often the most important factor related to poorer outcomes. Further discussion and analysis of the data will provide a comprehensive understanding of implications and recommendations for olecranon fracture fixation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Orthopedics is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for orthopaedics working on improving the quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to arthroplasty, hand surgery, limb reconstruction, pediatric orthopaedics, sports medicine, trauma, spinal deformities, and orthopaedic oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信