{"title":"定性研究与环境心理学的未来","authors":"Samuel Lloyd, Robert Gifford","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although environmental psychologists have made significant contributions to the understanding of human-environment interactions, contemporary critics argue that the field is not achieving its full potential. This article presents the results of a narrative review demonstrating that qualitative research methods can be a useful tool in addressing these concerns. The review focused on four articles that provide high-quality examples of popular qualitative methodologies: positivist mixed-methods research, grounded theory, phenomenology, and participatory action research. Together, these articles illustrate how qualitative methods can empower environmental psychologists to conduct inductive, context-sensitive research, to bring diverse voices and values into the discourse, and to more completely explain nuanced, complex human phenomena. The article concludes by describing how environmental psychologists can incorporate qualitative methods into their research, and opening a discussion about quality criteria in the field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 102347"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494424001208/pdfft?md5=03b024d2dcaf116065070f250ab09c28&pid=1-s2.0-S0272494424001208-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualitative research and the future of environmental psychology\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Lloyd, Robert Gifford\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Although environmental psychologists have made significant contributions to the understanding of human-environment interactions, contemporary critics argue that the field is not achieving its full potential. This article presents the results of a narrative review demonstrating that qualitative research methods can be a useful tool in addressing these concerns. The review focused on four articles that provide high-quality examples of popular qualitative methodologies: positivist mixed-methods research, grounded theory, phenomenology, and participatory action research. Together, these articles illustrate how qualitative methods can empower environmental psychologists to conduct inductive, context-sensitive research, to bring diverse voices and values into the discourse, and to more completely explain nuanced, complex human phenomena. The article concludes by describing how environmental psychologists can incorporate qualitative methods into their research, and opening a discussion about quality criteria in the field.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\"97 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102347\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494424001208/pdfft?md5=03b024d2dcaf116065070f250ab09c28&pid=1-s2.0-S0272494424001208-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494424001208\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494424001208","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Qualitative research and the future of environmental psychology
Although environmental psychologists have made significant contributions to the understanding of human-environment interactions, contemporary critics argue that the field is not achieving its full potential. This article presents the results of a narrative review demonstrating that qualitative research methods can be a useful tool in addressing these concerns. The review focused on four articles that provide high-quality examples of popular qualitative methodologies: positivist mixed-methods research, grounded theory, phenomenology, and participatory action research. Together, these articles illustrate how qualitative methods can empower environmental psychologists to conduct inductive, context-sensitive research, to bring diverse voices and values into the discourse, and to more completely explain nuanced, complex human phenomena. The article concludes by describing how environmental psychologists can incorporate qualitative methods into their research, and opening a discussion about quality criteria in the field.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space