多代理路径查找中的规划与检测:模型与算法(扩展摘要)

Yue Zhang, Zhe Chen, Daniel D. Harabor, P. L. Bodic, P. Stuckey
{"title":"多代理路径查找中的规划与检测:模型与算法(扩展摘要)","authors":"Yue Zhang, Zhe Chen, Daniel D. Harabor, P. L. Bodic, P. Stuckey","doi":"10.1609/socs.v17i1.31592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In applications of Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF), it is often the sum of planning and execution times that needs to be minimised (i.e., the Goal Achievement Time). Yet current methods seldom optimise for this objective. Optimal algorithms reduce execution time, but may require exponential planning time. Non-optimal algorithms reduce planning time, but at the expense of increased path length. To address these limitations we introduce PIE (Planning and Improving while Executing), a new framework for concurrent planning and execution in MAPF. We first show how PIE for one-shot MAPF improves practical performance compared to sequential planning and execution.We then adapt PIE to Lifelong MAPF, a popular application setting where agents are continuously assigned new goals and where additional decisions are required to ensure feasibility. We examine a variety of different approaches to overcome these challenges and we conduct comparative experiments vs. recently proposed alternatives. Results show that PIE substantially outperforms existing methods for One-shot and Lifelong MAPF.","PeriodicalId":425645,"journal":{"name":"Symposium on Combinatorial Search","volume":"29 12","pages":"303-304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Planning and Exection in Multi-Agent Path Finding: Models and Algorithms (Extended Abstract)\",\"authors\":\"Yue Zhang, Zhe Chen, Daniel D. Harabor, P. L. Bodic, P. Stuckey\",\"doi\":\"10.1609/socs.v17i1.31592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In applications of Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF), it is often the sum of planning and execution times that needs to be minimised (i.e., the Goal Achievement Time). Yet current methods seldom optimise for this objective. Optimal algorithms reduce execution time, but may require exponential planning time. Non-optimal algorithms reduce planning time, but at the expense of increased path length. To address these limitations we introduce PIE (Planning and Improving while Executing), a new framework for concurrent planning and execution in MAPF. We first show how PIE for one-shot MAPF improves practical performance compared to sequential planning and execution.We then adapt PIE to Lifelong MAPF, a popular application setting where agents are continuously assigned new goals and where additional decisions are required to ensure feasibility. We examine a variety of different approaches to overcome these challenges and we conduct comparative experiments vs. recently proposed alternatives. Results show that PIE substantially outperforms existing methods for One-shot and Lifelong MAPF.\",\"PeriodicalId\":425645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Symposium on Combinatorial Search\",\"volume\":\"29 12\",\"pages\":\"303-304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Symposium on Combinatorial Search\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1609/socs.v17i1.31592\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symposium on Combinatorial Search","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1609/socs.v17i1.31592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在多代理路径查找(MAPF)的应用中,需要尽量减少的往往是规划时间和执行时间之和(即目标实现时间)。然而,目前的方法很少针对这一目标进行优化。最优算法可以缩短执行时间,但可能需要指数级的规划时间。非最优算法可以缩短规划时间,但代价是增加路径长度。为了解决这些局限性,我们引入了 PIE(边执行边规划和改进),这是一种用于 MAPF 中并发规划和执行的新框架。我们首先展示了 PIE 在单次 MAPF 中与顺序规划和执行相比是如何提高实际性能的。然后,我们将 PIE 应用于终身 MAPF,这是一种流行的应用设置,在这种设置中,代理会不断被分配新的目标,并且需要额外的决策来确保可行性。我们研究了各种不同的方法来克服这些挑战,并与最近提出的替代方案进行了对比实验。结果表明,PIE 在单次和终身 MAPF 方面大大优于现有方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Planning and Exection in Multi-Agent Path Finding: Models and Algorithms (Extended Abstract)
In applications of Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF), it is often the sum of planning and execution times that needs to be minimised (i.e., the Goal Achievement Time). Yet current methods seldom optimise for this objective. Optimal algorithms reduce execution time, but may require exponential planning time. Non-optimal algorithms reduce planning time, but at the expense of increased path length. To address these limitations we introduce PIE (Planning and Improving while Executing), a new framework for concurrent planning and execution in MAPF. We first show how PIE for one-shot MAPF improves practical performance compared to sequential planning and execution.We then adapt PIE to Lifelong MAPF, a popular application setting where agents are continuously assigned new goals and where additional decisions are required to ensure feasibility. We examine a variety of different approaches to overcome these challenges and we conduct comparative experiments vs. recently proposed alternatives. Results show that PIE substantially outperforms existing methods for One-shot and Lifelong MAPF.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信