通过组合覆盖措施确保可靠性

M. S. Raunak, D. R. Kuhn, R. Kacker, Y. Lei
{"title":"通过组合覆盖措施确保可靠性","authors":"M. S. Raunak, D. R. Kuhn, R. Kacker, Y. Lei","doi":"10.1109/MRL.2024.3389629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Verification of complex software systems is an important, yet challenging task. Testing is the most common method for assuring that software meets its specifications and is defect-free. To claim that software is defect-free and thus reliable, one has to show that it produces the “correct” output or “behaves” according to specification without failing under all possible parameter values and configurations. In the software verification world, this is known as exhaustive testing. For any software of reasonable size and complexity, exhaustive testing is completely infeasible. Thus, during the testing process, a small subset of parameter values and configurations is selected to ensure that the software is producing its output or maintaining its behavior as “expected.” The selected parameter value for one test execution is called a Test Case, and the set of test cases selected for testing a system is called a Test Suite. The essence of software testing, therefore, lies in effective ways of identifying the test cases and building the test suite. Two overarching questions related to this process include: 1) how to select the test cases and 2) how to decide when enough test cases have been selected. Over the years, researchers have proposed different Test Adequacy criteria for answering these two questions.","PeriodicalId":517825,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Reliability Magazine","volume":"51 14","pages":"20-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ensuring Reliability Through Combinatorial Coverage Measures\",\"authors\":\"M. S. Raunak, D. R. Kuhn, R. Kacker, Y. Lei\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MRL.2024.3389629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Verification of complex software systems is an important, yet challenging task. Testing is the most common method for assuring that software meets its specifications and is defect-free. To claim that software is defect-free and thus reliable, one has to show that it produces the “correct” output or “behaves” according to specification without failing under all possible parameter values and configurations. In the software verification world, this is known as exhaustive testing. For any software of reasonable size and complexity, exhaustive testing is completely infeasible. Thus, during the testing process, a small subset of parameter values and configurations is selected to ensure that the software is producing its output or maintaining its behavior as “expected.” The selected parameter value for one test execution is called a Test Case, and the set of test cases selected for testing a system is called a Test Suite. The essence of software testing, therefore, lies in effective ways of identifying the test cases and building the test suite. Two overarching questions related to this process include: 1) how to select the test cases and 2) how to decide when enough test cases have been selected. Over the years, researchers have proposed different Test Adequacy criteria for answering these two questions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Reliability Magazine\",\"volume\":\"51 14\",\"pages\":\"20-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Reliability Magazine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MRL.2024.3389629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Reliability Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MRL.2024.3389629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

复杂软件系统的验证是一项重要而又具有挑战性的任务。测试是确保软件符合规范和无缺陷的最常用方法。要声称软件无缺陷,因而可靠,就必须证明它能产生 "正确 "的输出,或按照规范 "运行",而不会在所有可能的参数值和配置下出现故障。在软件验证领域,这被称为穷举测试。对于任何具有合理规模和复杂性的软件来说,穷举测试都是完全不可行的。因此,在测试过程中,要选择一小部分参数值和配置,以确保软件按照 "预期 "产生输出或保持行为。为一次测试执行选择的参数值称为一个测试用例,为测试一个系统选择的测试用例集称为一个测试套件。因此,软件测试的精髓在于如何有效地确定测试用例和构建测试套件。与此过程相关的两个首要问题包括1) 如何选择测试用例;2) 如何决定何时选择了足够的测试用例。多年来,研究人员提出了不同的测试充分性标准来回答这两个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ensuring Reliability Through Combinatorial Coverage Measures
Verification of complex software systems is an important, yet challenging task. Testing is the most common method for assuring that software meets its specifications and is defect-free. To claim that software is defect-free and thus reliable, one has to show that it produces the “correct” output or “behaves” according to specification without failing under all possible parameter values and configurations. In the software verification world, this is known as exhaustive testing. For any software of reasonable size and complexity, exhaustive testing is completely infeasible. Thus, during the testing process, a small subset of parameter values and configurations is selected to ensure that the software is producing its output or maintaining its behavior as “expected.” The selected parameter value for one test execution is called a Test Case, and the set of test cases selected for testing a system is called a Test Suite. The essence of software testing, therefore, lies in effective ways of identifying the test cases and building the test suite. Two overarching questions related to this process include: 1) how to select the test cases and 2) how to decide when enough test cases have been selected. Over the years, researchers have proposed different Test Adequacy criteria for answering these two questions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信