编辑手记,2024 年 6 月

-. Editors
{"title":"编辑手记,2024 年 6 月","authors":"-. Editors","doi":"10.14452/mr-076-02-2024-06_0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"buy this issueIn this month's \"Notes from the Editors,\" the editors confront the myth of Marx's purported early Prometheanism and later rejection of the growth of productive forces altogether, favoring a \"no-growth path to communism.\" This ahistorical interpretation has engendered further critique of ecosocialism and degrowth on the part of self-identified productivist writers, who attempt incorrectly to paint degrowth as a Malthusian project, rather than a realistic effort to live within Earth's planetary capacities.","PeriodicalId":503049,"journal":{"name":"Monthly Review","volume":"59 45","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Notes from the Editors, June 2024\",\"authors\":\"-. Editors\",\"doi\":\"10.14452/mr-076-02-2024-06_0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"buy this issueIn this month's \\\"Notes from the Editors,\\\" the editors confront the myth of Marx's purported early Prometheanism and later rejection of the growth of productive forces altogether, favoring a \\\"no-growth path to communism.\\\" This ahistorical interpretation has engendered further critique of ecosocialism and degrowth on the part of self-identified productivist writers, who attempt incorrectly to paint degrowth as a Malthusian project, rather than a realistic effort to live within Earth's planetary capacities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monthly Review\",\"volume\":\"59 45\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monthly Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14452/mr-076-02-2024-06_0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monthly Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14452/mr-076-02-2024-06_0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

购买本期杂志在本月的 "编者按 "中,编者直面马克思所谓的早期普罗米修斯主义和后来完全拒绝生产力增长的神话,赞成 "通向共产主义的无增长之路"。这种不符合历史的解释引发了自我认同的生产力主义作家对生态社会主义和退步发展的进一步批判,他们试图错误地将退步发展描绘成马尔萨斯计划,而不是在地球能力范围内生活的现实努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Notes from the Editors, June 2024
buy this issueIn this month's "Notes from the Editors," the editors confront the myth of Marx's purported early Prometheanism and later rejection of the growth of productive forces altogether, favoring a "no-growth path to communism." This ahistorical interpretation has engendered further critique of ecosocialism and degrowth on the part of self-identified productivist writers, who attempt incorrectly to paint degrowth as a Malthusian project, rather than a realistic effort to live within Earth's planetary capacities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信