{"title":"编辑手记,2024 年 6 月","authors":"-. Editors","doi":"10.14452/mr-076-02-2024-06_0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"buy this issueIn this month's \"Notes from the Editors,\" the editors confront the myth of Marx's purported early Prometheanism and later rejection of the growth of productive forces altogether, favoring a \"no-growth path to communism.\" This ahistorical interpretation has engendered further critique of ecosocialism and degrowth on the part of self-identified productivist writers, who attempt incorrectly to paint degrowth as a Malthusian project, rather than a realistic effort to live within Earth's planetary capacities.","PeriodicalId":503049,"journal":{"name":"Monthly Review","volume":"59 45","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Notes from the Editors, June 2024\",\"authors\":\"-. Editors\",\"doi\":\"10.14452/mr-076-02-2024-06_0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"buy this issueIn this month's \\\"Notes from the Editors,\\\" the editors confront the myth of Marx's purported early Prometheanism and later rejection of the growth of productive forces altogether, favoring a \\\"no-growth path to communism.\\\" This ahistorical interpretation has engendered further critique of ecosocialism and degrowth on the part of self-identified productivist writers, who attempt incorrectly to paint degrowth as a Malthusian project, rather than a realistic effort to live within Earth's planetary capacities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monthly Review\",\"volume\":\"59 45\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monthly Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14452/mr-076-02-2024-06_0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monthly Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14452/mr-076-02-2024-06_0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
buy this issueIn this month's "Notes from the Editors," the editors confront the myth of Marx's purported early Prometheanism and later rejection of the growth of productive forces altogether, favoring a "no-growth path to communism." This ahistorical interpretation has engendered further critique of ecosocialism and degrowth on the part of self-identified productivist writers, who attempt incorrectly to paint degrowth as a Malthusian project, rather than a realistic effort to live within Earth's planetary capacities.