完善 PFAS 场地概念模型的数据评估框架

IF 1.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 WATER RESOURCES
Jeff Gamlin, Charles J. Newell, Chase Holton, Poonam R. Kulkarni, Jonathan Skaggs, David T. Adamson, Jens Blotevogel, Christopher P. Higgins
{"title":"完善 PFAS 场地概念模型的数据评估框架","authors":"Jeff Gamlin,&nbsp;Charles J. Newell,&nbsp;Chase Holton,&nbsp;Poonam R. Kulkarni,&nbsp;Jonathan Skaggs,&nbsp;David T. Adamson,&nbsp;Jens Blotevogel,&nbsp;Christopher P. Higgins","doi":"10.1111/gwmr.12666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Contaminated sites with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are the cause of environmental, health, and financial concerns. Understanding and addressing PFASs at their source areas is important for effective characterization, risk assessment, and remediation. This paper introduces a framework that relies on commonly available PFAS data to assist in identifying PFAS source areas and assess PFAS fate and transport considerations along flowpaths. Currently accepted PFAS physical and chemical behaviors have been incorporated into metrics that can be evaluated geospatially, and/or over time, to build a weight-of-evidence approach to refine conceptual site models (CSMs). Graphical representation of data according to a PFAS “family tree” is also proposed for more consistent interpretation and pattern recognition. Combined, these tools create a PFAS data evaluation framework (PFAS Framework) that consists of a tiered analysis approach based on data availability and site complexity. Case studies from real sites are presented to demonstrate the capabilities of the PFAS Framework in identifying source areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":55081,"journal":{"name":"Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation","volume":"44 4","pages":"53-66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwmr.12666","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data Evaluation Framework for Refining PFAS Conceptual Site Models\",\"authors\":\"Jeff Gamlin,&nbsp;Charles J. Newell,&nbsp;Chase Holton,&nbsp;Poonam R. Kulkarni,&nbsp;Jonathan Skaggs,&nbsp;David T. Adamson,&nbsp;Jens Blotevogel,&nbsp;Christopher P. Higgins\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gwmr.12666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Contaminated sites with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are the cause of environmental, health, and financial concerns. Understanding and addressing PFASs at their source areas is important for effective characterization, risk assessment, and remediation. This paper introduces a framework that relies on commonly available PFAS data to assist in identifying PFAS source areas and assess PFAS fate and transport considerations along flowpaths. Currently accepted PFAS physical and chemical behaviors have been incorporated into metrics that can be evaluated geospatially, and/or over time, to build a weight-of-evidence approach to refine conceptual site models (CSMs). Graphical representation of data according to a PFAS “family tree” is also proposed for more consistent interpretation and pattern recognition. Combined, these tools create a PFAS data evaluation framework (PFAS Framework) that consists of a tiered analysis approach based on data availability and site complexity. Case studies from real sites are presented to demonstrate the capabilities of the PFAS Framework in identifying source areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation\",\"volume\":\"44 4\",\"pages\":\"53-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwmr.12666\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwmr.12666\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwmr.12666","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFASs)污染场地是造成环境、健康和经济问题的原因。在污染源区域了解和处理 PFASs 对于有效的特征描述、风险评估和修复非常重要。本文介绍了一个框架,该框架依赖于常见的 PFAS 数据,以帮助确定 PFAS 源区,并评估 PFAS 的归宿和沿流动路径的迁移因素。目前公认的 PFAS 物理和化学行为已被纳入可在地理空间上和/或随着时间推移进行评估的指标中,以建立一种证据权重法来完善概念站点模型 (CSM)。此外,还建议根据全氟辛烷磺酸 "家族树 "对数据进行图形表示,以便进行更一致的解释和模式识别。这些工具结合在一起,创建了一个 PFAS 数据评估框架(PFAS 框架),其中包括基于数据可用性和现场复杂性的分层分析方法。该框架由基于数据可用性和现场复杂性的分层分析方法组成。通过对实际现场的案例研究,展示了 PFAS 框架在确定污染源区域方面的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Data Evaluation Framework for Refining PFAS Conceptual Site Models

Data Evaluation Framework for Refining PFAS Conceptual Site Models

Contaminated sites with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are the cause of environmental, health, and financial concerns. Understanding and addressing PFASs at their source areas is important for effective characterization, risk assessment, and remediation. This paper introduces a framework that relies on commonly available PFAS data to assist in identifying PFAS source areas and assess PFAS fate and transport considerations along flowpaths. Currently accepted PFAS physical and chemical behaviors have been incorporated into metrics that can be evaluated geospatially, and/or over time, to build a weight-of-evidence approach to refine conceptual site models (CSMs). Graphical representation of data according to a PFAS “family tree” is also proposed for more consistent interpretation and pattern recognition. Combined, these tools create a PFAS data evaluation framework (PFAS Framework) that consists of a tiered analysis approach based on data availability and site complexity. Case studies from real sites are presented to demonstrate the capabilities of the PFAS Framework in identifying source areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1981, Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation® has been a resource for researchers and practitioners in the field. It is a quarterly journal that offers the best in application oriented, peer-reviewed papers together with insightful articles from the practitioner''s perspective. Each issue features papers containing cutting-edge information on treatment technology, columns by industry experts, news briefs, and equipment news. GWMR plays a unique role in advancing the practice of the groundwater monitoring and remediation field by providing forward-thinking research with practical solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信