{"title":"对气候信息的认知需求","authors":"Tenzin Tamang","doi":"10.1088/2515-7620/ad53a8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Understanding that human activities primarily cause climate change is fundamental to driving behavioral change. However, a significant gap exists regarding its anthropogenic nature, with public understanding often lagging behind the scientific consensus. This underscores that previous efforts to bridge this gap have not been effective, highlighting that the reception of information is a complex process influenced by individual perspectives, biases, and preconceptions. Therefore, an individual’s information behavior is crucial in the interrelationship between climate science and the public. This study investigated the factors explaining individuals’ perceived information needs to form a firm opinion about climate change. It explored the roles of information gaps, climate anxiety, and environmental adversity in shaping these needs. The study’s analysis is based on the 2021 Climate Change Opinion Survey (N = 76,328) from Meta’s Data for Good Program. The survey was conducted on Facebook, inviting active users aged 18 and above to participate through their news feeds. It was administered across 31 countries. For the analysis, multinomial logistic regression was employed. The results showed that a high climate information gap and anxiety are positively associated with information needs. Environmental adversity is also positively correlated with climate information needs, but one’s awareness of climate change moderated the association.","PeriodicalId":505267,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research Communications","volume":"11 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived Need for Climate Information\",\"authors\":\"Tenzin Tamang\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/2515-7620/ad53a8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Understanding that human activities primarily cause climate change is fundamental to driving behavioral change. However, a significant gap exists regarding its anthropogenic nature, with public understanding often lagging behind the scientific consensus. This underscores that previous efforts to bridge this gap have not been effective, highlighting that the reception of information is a complex process influenced by individual perspectives, biases, and preconceptions. Therefore, an individual’s information behavior is crucial in the interrelationship between climate science and the public. This study investigated the factors explaining individuals’ perceived information needs to form a firm opinion about climate change. It explored the roles of information gaps, climate anxiety, and environmental adversity in shaping these needs. The study’s analysis is based on the 2021 Climate Change Opinion Survey (N = 76,328) from Meta’s Data for Good Program. The survey was conducted on Facebook, inviting active users aged 18 and above to participate through their news feeds. It was administered across 31 countries. For the analysis, multinomial logistic regression was employed. The results showed that a high climate information gap and anxiety are positively associated with information needs. Environmental adversity is also positively correlated with climate information needs, but one’s awareness of climate change moderated the association.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Research Communications\",\"volume\":\"11 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Research Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad53a8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad53a8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
了解人类活动是气候变化的主要原因是推动行为改变的基础。然而,在气候变化的人为性质方面还存在很大差距,公众的理解往往落后于科学共识。这突出表明,以往为弥合这一差距所做的努力并不奏效,突出表明信息接收是一个复杂的过程,受个人观点、偏见和先入之见的影响。因此,个人的信息行为对气候科学与公众之间的相互关系至关重要。本研究调查了个人形成对气候变化的坚定观点的信息需求感知因素。它探讨了信息差距、气候焦虑和环境逆境在形成这些需求方面的作用。本研究的分析基于 Meta 的 "数据造福计划"(Data for Good Program)中的 "2021 年气候变化观点调查"(N=76,328)。调查在 Facebook 上进行,邀请 18 岁及以上的活跃用户通过他们的新闻推送参与。调查在 31 个国家进行。分析采用了多项式逻辑回归法。结果显示,气候信息缺口大和焦虑与信息需求呈正相关。环境逆境也与气候信息需求呈正相关,但个人对气候变化的认识会缓和这种关联。
Understanding that human activities primarily cause climate change is fundamental to driving behavioral change. However, a significant gap exists regarding its anthropogenic nature, with public understanding often lagging behind the scientific consensus. This underscores that previous efforts to bridge this gap have not been effective, highlighting that the reception of information is a complex process influenced by individual perspectives, biases, and preconceptions. Therefore, an individual’s information behavior is crucial in the interrelationship between climate science and the public. This study investigated the factors explaining individuals’ perceived information needs to form a firm opinion about climate change. It explored the roles of information gaps, climate anxiety, and environmental adversity in shaping these needs. The study’s analysis is based on the 2021 Climate Change Opinion Survey (N = 76,328) from Meta’s Data for Good Program. The survey was conducted on Facebook, inviting active users aged 18 and above to participate through their news feeds. It was administered across 31 countries. For the analysis, multinomial logistic regression was employed. The results showed that a high climate information gap and anxiety are positively associated with information needs. Environmental adversity is also positively correlated with climate information needs, but one’s awareness of climate change moderated the association.