对兴奋剂和丁丙诺啡转用的看法及应对策略

L. Uscher-Pines, Jessica Sousa, Pushpa Raja, A. Mehrotra, Alisa B. Busch, H. Huskamp
{"title":"对兴奋剂和丁丙诺啡转用的看法及应对策略","authors":"L. Uscher-Pines, Jessica Sousa, Pushpa Raja, A. Mehrotra, Alisa B. Busch, H. Huskamp","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n There is ongoing policy debate on the prescribing of controlled substances such as buprenorphine and stimulants via telemedicine. The goal of federal and state policymakers is to ensure access to care while limiting diversion risk. However, there is little evidence on how clinicians view and address diversion and on telemedicine's role in diversion. From December 2023-January 2024, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 21 psychiatrists and primary care physicians engaged in hybrid (telemedicine and in-person) care models in which we explored perceptions of diversion and strategies used to monitor for diversion. Most physicians reported monitoring for diversion, but there was little consistency on how monitoring was done and reported strategies did not differ between telemedicine vs. in-person care. When physicians suspected diversion, there was also wide variation in responses. Few physicians had ever reported a case of suspected diversion to law enforcement. Our findings suggest that the Drug Enforcement Administration could clarify reporting requirements and professional societies could provide additional guidance on how to respond to suspected diversion, given the current variation in practice across clinicians could be exploited by individuals who want to divert.","PeriodicalId":502462,"journal":{"name":"Health Affairs Scholar","volume":"29 30","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of Stimulant and Buprenorphine Diversion and Strategies to Address It\",\"authors\":\"L. Uscher-Pines, Jessica Sousa, Pushpa Raja, A. Mehrotra, Alisa B. Busch, H. Huskamp\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/haschl/qxae074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n There is ongoing policy debate on the prescribing of controlled substances such as buprenorphine and stimulants via telemedicine. The goal of federal and state policymakers is to ensure access to care while limiting diversion risk. However, there is little evidence on how clinicians view and address diversion and on telemedicine's role in diversion. From December 2023-January 2024, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 21 psychiatrists and primary care physicians engaged in hybrid (telemedicine and in-person) care models in which we explored perceptions of diversion and strategies used to monitor for diversion. Most physicians reported monitoring for diversion, but there was little consistency on how monitoring was done and reported strategies did not differ between telemedicine vs. in-person care. When physicians suspected diversion, there was also wide variation in responses. Few physicians had ever reported a case of suspected diversion to law enforcement. Our findings suggest that the Drug Enforcement Administration could clarify reporting requirements and professional societies could provide additional guidance on how to respond to suspected diversion, given the current variation in practice across clinicians could be exploited by individuals who want to divert.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Affairs Scholar\",\"volume\":\"29 30\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Affairs Scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Affairs Scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于通过远程医疗开具丁丙诺啡和兴奋剂等受管制药物处方的政策辩论一直在进行。联邦和各州政策制定者的目标是在限制药物转用风险的同时确保患者获得治疗。然而,关于临床医生如何看待和解决药物转用问题以及远程医疗在药物转用中所起作用的证据却很少。2023 年 12 月至 2024 年 1 月,我们对 21 名从事混合(远程医疗和面对面)医疗模式的精神科医生和初级保健医生进行了半结构化访谈,探讨了他们对转流的看法以及用于监控转流的策略。大多数医生都报告了对药物转用的监控情况,但在监控方式上几乎没有一致性,而且所报告的策略在远程医疗与面对面医疗之间并无差异。当医生怀疑药物被转用时,他们的反应也存在很大差异。很少有医生曾向执法部门报告过怀疑药物转用的案例。我们的研究结果表明,缉毒署可以明确报告要求,专业协会也可以就如何应对疑似药物转用提供更多指导,因为目前不同临床医生的做法存在差异,这可能会被想要转用药物的个人所利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceptions of Stimulant and Buprenorphine Diversion and Strategies to Address It
There is ongoing policy debate on the prescribing of controlled substances such as buprenorphine and stimulants via telemedicine. The goal of federal and state policymakers is to ensure access to care while limiting diversion risk. However, there is little evidence on how clinicians view and address diversion and on telemedicine's role in diversion. From December 2023-January 2024, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 21 psychiatrists and primary care physicians engaged in hybrid (telemedicine and in-person) care models in which we explored perceptions of diversion and strategies used to monitor for diversion. Most physicians reported monitoring for diversion, but there was little consistency on how monitoring was done and reported strategies did not differ between telemedicine vs. in-person care. When physicians suspected diversion, there was also wide variation in responses. Few physicians had ever reported a case of suspected diversion to law enforcement. Our findings suggest that the Drug Enforcement Administration could clarify reporting requirements and professional societies could provide additional guidance on how to respond to suspected diversion, given the current variation in practice across clinicians could be exploited by individuals who want to divert.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信