多层共鸣:对吟游诗人历史的再想象

Faruk Çalışkan
{"title":"多层共鸣:对吟游诗人历史的再想象","authors":"Faruk Çalışkan","doi":"10.31722/ejmd.1469482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article critically examines the historiography of the Turkish âşıklık [minstrelsy] tradition by assessing the agency and histories of âşıks [minstrels] through various ontologies to challenge the classifications and generalizations imposed by narrators in the recounting of mainstream âşık history. Specifically, Mehmed Fuad Köprülü’s (1890-1966) seminal research on âşıks and their tradition remains a guiding reference in shaping the overall historical narrative and subsequent academic studies. Traces of Köprülü’s canon are still present in contemporary research publications, which allows presuppositions regarding both âşıks and their tradition to persist in the national narrative of âşık history. To understand these multilayered circumstances, I use Actor-Network Theory [ANT] to shed light on the processes by which Köprülü’s canon is actively transmitted and reconciled within contemporary research networks, and I investigate the presuppositions held about âşıks and their tradition. Through a meticulous analysis of translations that contain assemblages of âşıks (human entities), objects (non-human entities), and discourses (non-corporeal entities), this article proposes a more inclusive past as a perspective, diverging from an exclusive historical narrative through ANTi-History. Moreover, it conducts an emancipatory ontological inquiry, critiquing the historiography of âşıks by tracing the paths of human actors across a broad spectrum that includes both non-humans and non-corporeal entities.","PeriodicalId":416510,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Music and Dance","volume":"18 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multilayered Resonance: Re-imaginations of the history of Âşıklık [Minstrelsy]\",\"authors\":\"Faruk Çalışkan\",\"doi\":\"10.31722/ejmd.1469482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article critically examines the historiography of the Turkish âşıklık [minstrelsy] tradition by assessing the agency and histories of âşıks [minstrels] through various ontologies to challenge the classifications and generalizations imposed by narrators in the recounting of mainstream âşık history. Specifically, Mehmed Fuad Köprülü’s (1890-1966) seminal research on âşıks and their tradition remains a guiding reference in shaping the overall historical narrative and subsequent academic studies. Traces of Köprülü’s canon are still present in contemporary research publications, which allows presuppositions regarding both âşıks and their tradition to persist in the national narrative of âşık history. To understand these multilayered circumstances, I use Actor-Network Theory [ANT] to shed light on the processes by which Köprülü’s canon is actively transmitted and reconciled within contemporary research networks, and I investigate the presuppositions held about âşıks and their tradition. Through a meticulous analysis of translations that contain assemblages of âşıks (human entities), objects (non-human entities), and discourses (non-corporeal entities), this article proposes a more inclusive past as a perspective, diverging from an exclusive historical narrative through ANTi-History. Moreover, it conducts an emancipatory ontological inquiry, critiquing the historiography of âşıks by tracing the paths of human actors across a broad spectrum that includes both non-humans and non-corporeal entities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurasian Journal of Music and Dance\",\"volume\":\"18 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurasian Journal of Music and Dance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31722/ejmd.1469482\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Music and Dance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31722/ejmd.1469482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对土耳其 "吟游诗人"(the Turkish âşıklık [minstrelsy])传统的历史学进行了批判性研究,通过各种本体论对 "吟游诗人"(the âşıks [minstrels])的机构和历史进行了评估,以质疑叙述者在叙述主流 "吟游诗人 "历史时强加的分类和概括。具体而言,穆罕默德-福阿德-科普吕吕(1890-1966 年)对âşıks 及其传统的开创性研究仍然是塑造整体历史叙事和后续学术研究的指导性参考。在当代研究出版物中仍然可以看到科普吕吕的研究成果,这使得有关鞑靼人及其传统的先入之见在鞑靼历史的国家叙事中持续存在。为了理解这些多层次的情况,我运用行动者-网络理论(ANT)揭示了科普吕吕先生的典籍在当代研究网络中积极传播和调和的过程,并研究了关于âşıks 及其传统的预设前提。本文通过对包含§şıks(人类实体)、物品(非人类实体)和话语(非肉体实体)组合的译本进行细致分析,提出了一个更具包容性的过去视角,通过 ANTi-History 与排他性的历史叙事相区分。此外,文章还进行了一次解放性的本体论探究,通过追踪人类行动者在包括非人类和非实体在内的广阔范围内的活动轨迹,对"§şıks "史学进行了批判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multilayered Resonance: Re-imaginations of the history of Âşıklık [Minstrelsy]
This article critically examines the historiography of the Turkish âşıklık [minstrelsy] tradition by assessing the agency and histories of âşıks [minstrels] through various ontologies to challenge the classifications and generalizations imposed by narrators in the recounting of mainstream âşık history. Specifically, Mehmed Fuad Köprülü’s (1890-1966) seminal research on âşıks and their tradition remains a guiding reference in shaping the overall historical narrative and subsequent academic studies. Traces of Köprülü’s canon are still present in contemporary research publications, which allows presuppositions regarding both âşıks and their tradition to persist in the national narrative of âşık history. To understand these multilayered circumstances, I use Actor-Network Theory [ANT] to shed light on the processes by which Köprülü’s canon is actively transmitted and reconciled within contemporary research networks, and I investigate the presuppositions held about âşıks and their tradition. Through a meticulous analysis of translations that contain assemblages of âşıks (human entities), objects (non-human entities), and discourses (non-corporeal entities), this article proposes a more inclusive past as a perspective, diverging from an exclusive historical narrative through ANTi-History. Moreover, it conducts an emancipatory ontological inquiry, critiquing the historiography of âşıks by tracing the paths of human actors across a broad spectrum that includes both non-humans and non-corporeal entities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信