Sonu Yadav, Gayatri Kumari, Sushant Sukumar Patil, Chinthakuntla Sudharshan Reddy, Barkha, K. Bokado
{"title":"作物种植方法和杂草管理措施对水稻产量和生物能的影响","authors":"Sonu Yadav, Gayatri Kumari, Sushant Sukumar Patil, Chinthakuntla Sudharshan Reddy, Barkha, K. Bokado","doi":"10.18805/ag.d-5870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: SRI and aerobic rice are one of the techniques of growing rice under water scarcity areas where meeting water requirement is becoming a global threat. Weeds are another threat to yield of rice irrespective of different establishment methods. Until checked, it can decline rice yield and quality up to more than 70%. SRI and aerobic rice have different densities of weeds and integrated weed management can be applied to suppress the weeds. Considering the current scenario, research was conducted to investigate growth, yield and bioenergetics of rice under different establishment methods and weed management. Methods: The experiment entitled “Effect of crop establishment methods and weed management practices on productivity and bioenergetics of rice” was carried out in split plot design with main plots, viz., M1- aerobic rice (AR) and M2- system of rice intensification (SRI) and five subplots W1- pre-emergence (pendimethalin @1 kg a.i ha-1) fb post-emergence (bispyribac-sodium @20g a.i ha-1) (PE+POE), W2- pre-emergence (pendimethalin @1 kg a.i ha-1) fb cono weeding at 15, 30, and 45 DAT/ DAS (PE+CW), W3- weed free (WF), W4- weedy check (WC), W5- stale seedbed followed by post-emergence herbicide (bispyribac-sodium 10% SC 20 g a.i ha-1) (SSB+POE) in split plot design with three replications taking the variety ‘Pusa Basmati-1121’ as a test crop. Result: Among the establishment methods, SRI recorded significantly higher growth attributes like plant height and dry matter production and yield attributes like number of panicles per hill, panicle length, number of grains per panicle, test weight, grain yield, straw yield, biological yield, and harvest index. Among the weed management treatments, WF recorded significantly higher growth attributes like plant height, number of tillers per hill, dry matter production and yield attributes like number of panicles per hill, panicle length, number of grains per panicle, test weight, grain yield, straw yield, biological yield, and harvest index that was followed by treatment PE+CW. Maximum net return and B:C ratio was observed in the treatment combinations M2W2- SRI + (PE+CW). The maximum total energy input was found in the treatment combination M1W1- AR+ (PE+POE) and the maximum total energy output was found in the treatment combination M2W3- SRI + WF. The energy intensiveness was observed to be maximum in the treatment combination M1W4- AR + WC and the maximum energy efficiency index was observed in the treatment combination M2W3- SRI+WF.\n","PeriodicalId":503872,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Science Digest - A Research Journal","volume":"84 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Crop Establishment Methods and Weed Management Practices on Productivity and Bioenergetics of Rice\",\"authors\":\"Sonu Yadav, Gayatri Kumari, Sushant Sukumar Patil, Chinthakuntla Sudharshan Reddy, Barkha, K. Bokado\",\"doi\":\"10.18805/ag.d-5870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: SRI and aerobic rice are one of the techniques of growing rice under water scarcity areas where meeting water requirement is becoming a global threat. Weeds are another threat to yield of rice irrespective of different establishment methods. Until checked, it can decline rice yield and quality up to more than 70%. SRI and aerobic rice have different densities of weeds and integrated weed management can be applied to suppress the weeds. Considering the current scenario, research was conducted to investigate growth, yield and bioenergetics of rice under different establishment methods and weed management. Methods: The experiment entitled “Effect of crop establishment methods and weed management practices on productivity and bioenergetics of rice” was carried out in split plot design with main plots, viz., M1- aerobic rice (AR) and M2- system of rice intensification (SRI) and five subplots W1- pre-emergence (pendimethalin @1 kg a.i ha-1) fb post-emergence (bispyribac-sodium @20g a.i ha-1) (PE+POE), W2- pre-emergence (pendimethalin @1 kg a.i ha-1) fb cono weeding at 15, 30, and 45 DAT/ DAS (PE+CW), W3- weed free (WF), W4- weedy check (WC), W5- stale seedbed followed by post-emergence herbicide (bispyribac-sodium 10% SC 20 g a.i ha-1) (SSB+POE) in split plot design with three replications taking the variety ‘Pusa Basmati-1121’ as a test crop. Result: Among the establishment methods, SRI recorded significantly higher growth attributes like plant height and dry matter production and yield attributes like number of panicles per hill, panicle length, number of grains per panicle, test weight, grain yield, straw yield, biological yield, and harvest index. Among the weed management treatments, WF recorded significantly higher growth attributes like plant height, number of tillers per hill, dry matter production and yield attributes like number of panicles per hill, panicle length, number of grains per panicle, test weight, grain yield, straw yield, biological yield, and harvest index that was followed by treatment PE+CW. Maximum net return and B:C ratio was observed in the treatment combinations M2W2- SRI + (PE+CW). The maximum total energy input was found in the treatment combination M1W1- AR+ (PE+POE) and the maximum total energy output was found in the treatment combination M2W3- SRI + WF. The energy intensiveness was observed to be maximum in the treatment combination M1W4- AR + WC and the maximum energy efficiency index was observed in the treatment combination M2W3- SRI+WF.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":503872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Science Digest - A Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"84 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Science Digest - A Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.d-5870\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Science Digest - A Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.d-5870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:SRI 和好氧水稻是缺水地区种植水稻的技术之一,在缺水地区,满足水资源需求已成为全球性威胁。无论采用何种种植方法,杂草都是水稻产量的另一个威胁。如果不加以控制,杂草会使水稻产量和质量下降 70% 以上。SRI 和好氧水稻的杂草密度不同,可以采用综合杂草管理来抑制杂草。考虑到这一现状,研究人员对不同种植方法和杂草管理下水稻的生长、产量和生物能进行了调查。研究方法题为 "作物种植方法和杂草管理措施对水稻产量和生物能的影响 "的实验采用分小区设计,主小区分别为M1-有氧水稻(AR)和 M2-水稻强化系统(SRI),以及五个子小区:W1-萌芽前(戊唑醇 @1 kg a.i ha-1)和萌芽后(双嘧磺隆 @20g a.i ha-1)(PE+POE)、W2-萌芽前(戊唑醇 @1 kg a. i ha-1)和双嘧磺隆 @20g a.i ha-1(PE+POE)。以品种 "Pusa Basmati-1121 "为试验作物,采用分小区设计,三次重复,分别在 15、30 和 45 日龄/ DAS(PE+CW)、W3-无杂草(WF)、W4-杂草对照(WC)、W5-陈旧苗床,然后使用苗后除草剂(10%双草醚 SC 20 g a.i ha-1)(SSB+POE)。结果:在各种种植方法中,SRI 的植株高度和干物质产量等生长属性以及每丘圆锥花序数、圆锥花序长度、每粒圆锥花序粒数、测试重量、谷物产量、秸秆产量、生物产量和收获指数等产量属性都明显较高。在杂草管理处理中,WF 的植株高度、每丘分蘖数、干物质产量等生长属性和每丘圆锥花序数、圆锥花序长度、每圆锥花序粒数、测试重量、谷物产量、秸秆产量、生物产量和收获指数等产量属性都明显高于 PE+CW 处理。M2W2-SRI+(PE+CW)处理组合的净收益和 B:C 比率最高。M1W1- AR+ (PE+POE) 处理组合的总能量输入最大,M2W3- SRI + WF 处理组合的总能量输出最大。在处理组合 M1W4- AR + WC 中观察到能源强度最大,在处理组合 M2W3- SRI + WF 中观察到能效指数最大。
Effect of Crop Establishment Methods and Weed Management Practices on Productivity and Bioenergetics of Rice
Background: SRI and aerobic rice are one of the techniques of growing rice under water scarcity areas where meeting water requirement is becoming a global threat. Weeds are another threat to yield of rice irrespective of different establishment methods. Until checked, it can decline rice yield and quality up to more than 70%. SRI and aerobic rice have different densities of weeds and integrated weed management can be applied to suppress the weeds. Considering the current scenario, research was conducted to investigate growth, yield and bioenergetics of rice under different establishment methods and weed management. Methods: The experiment entitled “Effect of crop establishment methods and weed management practices on productivity and bioenergetics of rice” was carried out in split plot design with main plots, viz., M1- aerobic rice (AR) and M2- system of rice intensification (SRI) and five subplots W1- pre-emergence (pendimethalin @1 kg a.i ha-1) fb post-emergence (bispyribac-sodium @20g a.i ha-1) (PE+POE), W2- pre-emergence (pendimethalin @1 kg a.i ha-1) fb cono weeding at 15, 30, and 45 DAT/ DAS (PE+CW), W3- weed free (WF), W4- weedy check (WC), W5- stale seedbed followed by post-emergence herbicide (bispyribac-sodium 10% SC 20 g a.i ha-1) (SSB+POE) in split plot design with three replications taking the variety ‘Pusa Basmati-1121’ as a test crop. Result: Among the establishment methods, SRI recorded significantly higher growth attributes like plant height and dry matter production and yield attributes like number of panicles per hill, panicle length, number of grains per panicle, test weight, grain yield, straw yield, biological yield, and harvest index. Among the weed management treatments, WF recorded significantly higher growth attributes like plant height, number of tillers per hill, dry matter production and yield attributes like number of panicles per hill, panicle length, number of grains per panicle, test weight, grain yield, straw yield, biological yield, and harvest index that was followed by treatment PE+CW. Maximum net return and B:C ratio was observed in the treatment combinations M2W2- SRI + (PE+CW). The maximum total energy input was found in the treatment combination M1W1- AR+ (PE+POE) and the maximum total energy output was found in the treatment combination M2W3- SRI + WF. The energy intensiveness was observed to be maximum in the treatment combination M1W4- AR + WC and the maximum energy efficiency index was observed in the treatment combination M2W3- SRI+WF.