{"title":"邀请游戏","authors":"Elisabeth Muth Andersen","doi":"10.1075/ip.00111.and","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper analyses Danish Tinder chats that in the very first message after ‘matching’ immediately launch the\n prospect of meeting. A collection of 41 threads is analyzed using Goffman’s (1967, 1974) concepts of face and interactional framing, outlining\n methods participants use to open a chat after having matched and addressing the interest and purpose they have approached in the\n other party. Methods include, in particular, inferences that can be made based on the type of activity or setting suggested for a\n future meeting, indirectness and ambiguity related to how the social actions are designed, and the conversational cues used such\n as emojis and enthusiasm markers. The analysis also shows how participants work out and negotiate whether they have a common\n interest in meeting, in particular, how they exploit and deal with ambiguities used extensively as a mechanism for flirting. The\n analysis further suggests that practices adhere to gender-stereotypes showing how participants may handle and orient to a norm\n that women should not agree to meet with a stranger early on in a chat correspondence.","PeriodicalId":36241,"journal":{"name":"Internet Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The invitation game\",\"authors\":\"Elisabeth Muth Andersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ip.00111.and\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper analyses Danish Tinder chats that in the very first message after ‘matching’ immediately launch the\\n prospect of meeting. A collection of 41 threads is analyzed using Goffman’s (1967, 1974) concepts of face and interactional framing, outlining\\n methods participants use to open a chat after having matched and addressing the interest and purpose they have approached in the\\n other party. Methods include, in particular, inferences that can be made based on the type of activity or setting suggested for a\\n future meeting, indirectness and ambiguity related to how the social actions are designed, and the conversational cues used such\\n as emojis and enthusiasm markers. The analysis also shows how participants work out and negotiate whether they have a common\\n interest in meeting, in particular, how they exploit and deal with ambiguities used extensively as a mechanism for flirting. The\\n analysis further suggests that practices adhere to gender-stereotypes showing how participants may handle and orient to a norm\\n that women should not agree to meet with a stranger early on in a chat correspondence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internet Pragmatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internet Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00111.and\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00111.and","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper analyses Danish Tinder chats that in the very first message after ‘matching’ immediately launch the
prospect of meeting. A collection of 41 threads is analyzed using Goffman’s (1967, 1974) concepts of face and interactional framing, outlining
methods participants use to open a chat after having matched and addressing the interest and purpose they have approached in the
other party. Methods include, in particular, inferences that can be made based on the type of activity or setting suggested for a
future meeting, indirectness and ambiguity related to how the social actions are designed, and the conversational cues used such
as emojis and enthusiasm markers. The analysis also shows how participants work out and negotiate whether they have a common
interest in meeting, in particular, how they exploit and deal with ambiguities used extensively as a mechanism for flirting. The
analysis further suggests that practices adhere to gender-stereotypes showing how participants may handle and orient to a norm
that women should not agree to meet with a stranger early on in a chat correspondence.