老年人的握力下降率和随后的认知衰退率:社会隔离的调节作用

Yanzhi Li, Liwan Zhu, Hao Zhao, Caiyun Zhang, Wanxin Wang, Lan Guo, Ciyong Lu
{"title":"老年人的握力下降率和随后的认知衰退率:社会隔离的调节作用","authors":"Yanzhi Li, Liwan Zhu, Hao Zhao, Caiyun Zhang, Wanxin Wang, Lan Guo, Ciyong Lu","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igae055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Accumulating evidence suggests that low grip strength (GS) was associated with a faster cognitive decline, but most previous studies have measured GS at a single time point, ignoring changes in GS. We aimed to explore the association of the GS loss rate with the sequent cognitive decline, as well as the moderating role of social isolation in older adults.\n \n \n \n Data were from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Absolute and relative GS loss rates were calculated as the annual losses from wave 2 (2004–2005) to wave 4 (2008–2009). Participants were divided into three groups according to the tertiles of GS loss rates. Linear mixed models were used to assess the association of the GS loss rate during waves 2–4 with the cognitive decline rate during waves 4–9 (2018–2019).\n \n \n \n Of the 4356 participants included in analyses, 1938 (44.5%) were men, with a mean age of 68.4 (SD: 8.4) years. Compared with tertile 1 of the absolute GS loss rate, tertile 2 (β = -0.009 [95% CI: -0.018, -0.001] SD/year) and tertile 3 (β = -0.018 [95% CI: -0.027, -0.010] SD/year) were associated with a faster cognitive decline rate. The results of relative GS were similar to those of absolute GS. Social isolation was a significant modifier in the associations of the absolute GS loss rate with decline rates in global cognition and episodic memory, but not in temporal orientation. We did not observe that social isolation moderated the association of the relative GS loss rate with the cognitive decline rate.\n \n \n \n Both absolute and relative GS loss rates were positively associated with the cognitive decline rate in older adults. Low social isolation scores attenuated the association of the absolute GS loss rate with the cognitive decline rate.\n","PeriodicalId":507173,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The grip strength loss rate and the subsequent cognitive decline rate in older adults: The moderating role of social isolation\",\"authors\":\"Yanzhi Li, Liwan Zhu, Hao Zhao, Caiyun Zhang, Wanxin Wang, Lan Guo, Ciyong Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geroni/igae055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Accumulating evidence suggests that low grip strength (GS) was associated with a faster cognitive decline, but most previous studies have measured GS at a single time point, ignoring changes in GS. We aimed to explore the association of the GS loss rate with the sequent cognitive decline, as well as the moderating role of social isolation in older adults.\\n \\n \\n \\n Data were from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Absolute and relative GS loss rates were calculated as the annual losses from wave 2 (2004–2005) to wave 4 (2008–2009). Participants were divided into three groups according to the tertiles of GS loss rates. Linear mixed models were used to assess the association of the GS loss rate during waves 2–4 with the cognitive decline rate during waves 4–9 (2018–2019).\\n \\n \\n \\n Of the 4356 participants included in analyses, 1938 (44.5%) were men, with a mean age of 68.4 (SD: 8.4) years. Compared with tertile 1 of the absolute GS loss rate, tertile 2 (β = -0.009 [95% CI: -0.018, -0.001] SD/year) and tertile 3 (β = -0.018 [95% CI: -0.027, -0.010] SD/year) were associated with a faster cognitive decline rate. The results of relative GS were similar to those of absolute GS. Social isolation was a significant modifier in the associations of the absolute GS loss rate with decline rates in global cognition and episodic memory, but not in temporal orientation. We did not observe that social isolation moderated the association of the relative GS loss rate with the cognitive decline rate.\\n \\n \\n \\n Both absolute and relative GS loss rates were positively associated with the cognitive decline rate in older adults. Low social isolation scores attenuated the association of the absolute GS loss rate with the cognitive decline rate.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":507173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,低握力(GS)与认知能力的加速衰退有关,但之前的大多数研究都是在单一时间点测量GS,忽略了GS的变化。我们的目的是探讨握力损失率与认知能力连续下降之间的关系,以及社会隔离在老年人中的调节作用。 数据来自英国老龄化纵向研究。GS的绝对和相对损失率按第2波(2004-2005年)至第4波(2008-2009年)的年损失率计算。根据GS损失率的分层将参与者分为三组。线性混合模型用于评估第2-4波的GS损失率与第4-9波(2018-2019年)认知能力下降率之间的关联。 在纳入分析的 4356 名参与者中,1938 人(44.5%)为男性,平均年龄为 68.4 岁(标度:8.4)。与绝对 GS 下降率的 1 级相比,2 级(β = -0.009 [95% CI: -0.018, -0.001] SD/年)和 3 级(β = -0.018 [95% CI: -0.027, -0.010] SD/年)的认知能力下降速度更快。相对 GS 的结果与绝对 GS 的结果相似。社会隔离是绝对 GS 下降率与整体认知和外显记忆下降率相关的一个重要调节因素,但与时间定向无关。我们没有观察到社会隔离调节了相对 GS 损失率与认知能力下降率之间的关联。 绝对和相对 GS 损失率都与老年人认知能力下降率呈正相关。较低的社会隔离分数减弱了GS绝对损失率与认知衰退率之间的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The grip strength loss rate and the subsequent cognitive decline rate in older adults: The moderating role of social isolation
Accumulating evidence suggests that low grip strength (GS) was associated with a faster cognitive decline, but most previous studies have measured GS at a single time point, ignoring changes in GS. We aimed to explore the association of the GS loss rate with the sequent cognitive decline, as well as the moderating role of social isolation in older adults. Data were from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Absolute and relative GS loss rates were calculated as the annual losses from wave 2 (2004–2005) to wave 4 (2008–2009). Participants were divided into three groups according to the tertiles of GS loss rates. Linear mixed models were used to assess the association of the GS loss rate during waves 2–4 with the cognitive decline rate during waves 4–9 (2018–2019). Of the 4356 participants included in analyses, 1938 (44.5%) were men, with a mean age of 68.4 (SD: 8.4) years. Compared with tertile 1 of the absolute GS loss rate, tertile 2 (β = -0.009 [95% CI: -0.018, -0.001] SD/year) and tertile 3 (β = -0.018 [95% CI: -0.027, -0.010] SD/year) were associated with a faster cognitive decline rate. The results of relative GS were similar to those of absolute GS. Social isolation was a significant modifier in the associations of the absolute GS loss rate with decline rates in global cognition and episodic memory, but not in temporal orientation. We did not observe that social isolation moderated the association of the relative GS loss rate with the cognitive decline rate. Both absolute and relative GS loss rates were positively associated with the cognitive decline rate in older adults. Low social isolation scores attenuated the association of the absolute GS loss rate with the cognitive decline rate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信