M. Kenyon, S. O'Neil, L. English, A. Mallows, M. Lee, C. Stubbs, S. McAuliffe, G. Stephens, Briggs-Price, Kirwan S., P.
{"title":"医疗服务提供者在管理腱鞘病患者时对心理和社会心理筛查及干预措施的了解和使用:国际实践调查","authors":"M. Kenyon, S. O'Neil, L. English, A. Mallows, M. Lee, C. Stubbs, S. McAuliffe, G. Stephens, Briggs-Price, Kirwan S., P.","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.05.24308397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Title Clinician examination of Psychological and Psychosocial factors during management of patients with tendinopathy: An International Survey of Practice Background Psychological and psychosocial factors play an important role in the management of patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Currently, there is no information exploring how clinicians current practice is informed by these factors in the people with tendinopathy exists. Objectives To explore healthcare providers knowledge and use of psychological and social screening and interventions in the management of patients with tendinopathy Methods An online survey was developed by a group of tendon experts. The survey was disseminated via special interest groups, social networks and professional organisations internationally. Results The survey had 103 completed responses. The majority of respondents used the subjective, 53% (N=55), subjective and objective, 28%(n=29), or objective 6% (n=6) examination to screen for psychological factors using both verbal and nonverbal methods. Psychosocial factors were screened for during the subjective assessment by 75% (n=77) of respondents. A further 15% (n=15) screened during the subjective and objective combined whilst 5% (n=5) examined this factor in the objective assessment in isolation. Psychological screening tools were used by 25% (n= 26) of respondents and psychosocial factors by 12% (n=12) of respondents. Treatment typically comprised of individualised education, reassurance, addressing mal-adaptive behaviours and behaviour change. Confidence in assessment and treatment was mixed and clinicians identified a desire for more specific training and self-development. Conclusion The proportion of clinicians screening and measuring psychological and psychosocial factors in clinical practice is high, but few use validated tools due to a lack of time and confidence. Implication for clinical practice Clinicians commonly assess psychological and social factors during assessment of individuals with tendinopathy, as part of their subjective and objective assessments. It is unclear how successfully clinicians identify these factors during their assessments, as they rarely use validated screening tools. Key words Tendinopathy, psychological factors, social factors, holistic, biopsychosocial Funding None.","PeriodicalId":506788,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv","volume":"7 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare providers knowledge and use of psychological and psychoSOCIAL screening and interventions in the management of patients with tendinopathy: An International Survey of Practice\",\"authors\":\"M. Kenyon, S. O'Neil, L. English, A. Mallows, M. Lee, C. Stubbs, S. McAuliffe, G. Stephens, Briggs-Price, Kirwan S., P.\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.06.05.24308397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Title Clinician examination of Psychological and Psychosocial factors during management of patients with tendinopathy: An International Survey of Practice Background Psychological and psychosocial factors play an important role in the management of patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Currently, there is no information exploring how clinicians current practice is informed by these factors in the people with tendinopathy exists. Objectives To explore healthcare providers knowledge and use of psychological and social screening and interventions in the management of patients with tendinopathy Methods An online survey was developed by a group of tendon experts. The survey was disseminated via special interest groups, social networks and professional organisations internationally. Results The survey had 103 completed responses. The majority of respondents used the subjective, 53% (N=55), subjective and objective, 28%(n=29), or objective 6% (n=6) examination to screen for psychological factors using both verbal and nonverbal methods. Psychosocial factors were screened for during the subjective assessment by 75% (n=77) of respondents. A further 15% (n=15) screened during the subjective and objective combined whilst 5% (n=5) examined this factor in the objective assessment in isolation. Psychological screening tools were used by 25% (n= 26) of respondents and psychosocial factors by 12% (n=12) of respondents. Treatment typically comprised of individualised education, reassurance, addressing mal-adaptive behaviours and behaviour change. Confidence in assessment and treatment was mixed and clinicians identified a desire for more specific training and self-development. Conclusion The proportion of clinicians screening and measuring psychological and psychosocial factors in clinical practice is high, but few use validated tools due to a lack of time and confidence. Implication for clinical practice Clinicians commonly assess psychological and social factors during assessment of individuals with tendinopathy, as part of their subjective and objective assessments. It is unclear how successfully clinicians identify these factors during their assessments, as they rarely use validated screening tools. Key words Tendinopathy, psychological factors, social factors, holistic, biopsychosocial Funding None.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv\",\"volume\":\"7 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.05.24308397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.05.24308397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Healthcare providers knowledge and use of psychological and psychoSOCIAL screening and interventions in the management of patients with tendinopathy: An International Survey of Practice
Title Clinician examination of Psychological and Psychosocial factors during management of patients with tendinopathy: An International Survey of Practice Background Psychological and psychosocial factors play an important role in the management of patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Currently, there is no information exploring how clinicians current practice is informed by these factors in the people with tendinopathy exists. Objectives To explore healthcare providers knowledge and use of psychological and social screening and interventions in the management of patients with tendinopathy Methods An online survey was developed by a group of tendon experts. The survey was disseminated via special interest groups, social networks and professional organisations internationally. Results The survey had 103 completed responses. The majority of respondents used the subjective, 53% (N=55), subjective and objective, 28%(n=29), or objective 6% (n=6) examination to screen for psychological factors using both verbal and nonverbal methods. Psychosocial factors were screened for during the subjective assessment by 75% (n=77) of respondents. A further 15% (n=15) screened during the subjective and objective combined whilst 5% (n=5) examined this factor in the objective assessment in isolation. Psychological screening tools were used by 25% (n= 26) of respondents and psychosocial factors by 12% (n=12) of respondents. Treatment typically comprised of individualised education, reassurance, addressing mal-adaptive behaviours and behaviour change. Confidence in assessment and treatment was mixed and clinicians identified a desire for more specific training and self-development. Conclusion The proportion of clinicians screening and measuring psychological and psychosocial factors in clinical practice is high, but few use validated tools due to a lack of time and confidence. Implication for clinical practice Clinicians commonly assess psychological and social factors during assessment of individuals with tendinopathy, as part of their subjective and objective assessments. It is unclear how successfully clinicians identify these factors during their assessments, as they rarely use validated screening tools. Key words Tendinopathy, psychological factors, social factors, holistic, biopsychosocial Funding None.