在施用粒细胞集落刺激因子的第四天进行一次无细胞抽吸,似乎就能从健康捐献者体内采集到足够的外周血干细胞

O. Yucel, Dilek Yapar, Ece Vural, Nurcan Alhan, Sertac Vurgun, Unal Atas, M. Alemdar, Mustafa Karaca, U. Iltar, O. Salim, L. Undar
{"title":"在施用粒细胞集落刺激因子的第四天进行一次无细胞抽吸,似乎就能从健康捐献者体内采集到足够的外周血干细胞","authors":"O. Yucel, Dilek Yapar, Ece Vural, Nurcan Alhan, Sertac Vurgun, Unal Atas, M. Alemdar, Mustafa Karaca, U. Iltar, O. Salim, L. Undar","doi":"10.1159/000538457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To minimize adverse events of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection in healthy donors, it is reasonable to limit the total dose of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and/or the number of apheresis days without decreasing of PBSCs yield. Therefore, we have started to collect G-CSF induced PBSCs on day 4 instead of on day 5. So, we retrospectively aimed to investigate the results of this 4-day G-CSF administration. Study Design and Methods: Seventy-six healthy donors who performed on G-CSF induced PBSCs donation consecutively between January 2020 and July 2022 were included in this study. G-CSF (filgrastim) at 2 × 5 µg/kg/day subcutaneously was applied. Apheresis started on day 4. Results: Sixty-nine (90.8%) of 76 donors provided enough PBSCs on day 4 apheresis session. Younger age (p = 0.004), higher PB CD34+ cell count on the 4th day of G-CSF (p < 0.001), and male donor (p = 0.010) were correlated with increased amounts of PBSCs yield. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to predict very good mobilizers (collected PBSCs ≥8 × 106/kg after the first apheresis) were performed. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, male sex (p = 0.004), PB CD34+ cell count ≥100/µL on the 4th day of G-CSF (p < 0.001), and glomerular filtration rate ≥115 mL/min (p = 0.031) were found to be independent predicting factors to demonstrate very good mobilizer. Conclusion: It seems that starting the apheresis on the 4th day of G-CSF administration is effective and to provide minimal G-CSF exposure in healthy donors.","PeriodicalId":505859,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy","volume":"9 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single Apheresis Session on the 4th Day of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Administration Seems Convenient to Collect Enough Peripheral Blood Stem Cells from Healthy Donors\",\"authors\":\"O. Yucel, Dilek Yapar, Ece Vural, Nurcan Alhan, Sertac Vurgun, Unal Atas, M. Alemdar, Mustafa Karaca, U. Iltar, O. Salim, L. Undar\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000538457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: To minimize adverse events of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection in healthy donors, it is reasonable to limit the total dose of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and/or the number of apheresis days without decreasing of PBSCs yield. Therefore, we have started to collect G-CSF induced PBSCs on day 4 instead of on day 5. So, we retrospectively aimed to investigate the results of this 4-day G-CSF administration. Study Design and Methods: Seventy-six healthy donors who performed on G-CSF induced PBSCs donation consecutively between January 2020 and July 2022 were included in this study. G-CSF (filgrastim) at 2 × 5 µg/kg/day subcutaneously was applied. Apheresis started on day 4. Results: Sixty-nine (90.8%) of 76 donors provided enough PBSCs on day 4 apheresis session. Younger age (p = 0.004), higher PB CD34+ cell count on the 4th day of G-CSF (p < 0.001), and male donor (p = 0.010) were correlated with increased amounts of PBSCs yield. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to predict very good mobilizers (collected PBSCs ≥8 × 106/kg after the first apheresis) were performed. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, male sex (p = 0.004), PB CD34+ cell count ≥100/µL on the 4th day of G-CSF (p < 0.001), and glomerular filtration rate ≥115 mL/min (p = 0.031) were found to be independent predicting factors to demonstrate very good mobilizer. Conclusion: It seems that starting the apheresis on the 4th day of G-CSF administration is effective and to provide minimal G-CSF exposure in healthy donors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy\",\"volume\":\"9 25\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538457\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为尽量减少健康供者采集外周血干细胞(PBSC)的不良反应,在不降低PBSCs产量的情况下,限制粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)的总剂量和/或无细胞采集天数是合理的。因此,我们开始在第 4 天而不是第 5 天收集 G-CSF 诱导的 PBSCs。因此,我们回顾性地研究了4天G-CSF给药的结果。研究设计与方法:本研究纳入了在 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 7 月期间连续进行 G-CSF 诱导 PBSCs 捐献的 76 名健康捐献者。皮下注射 2 × 5 µg/kg/ 天的 G-CSF(filgrastim)。第 4 天开始进行血液透析。研究结果76名捐献者中有69名(90.8%)在第4天的血液净化过程中提供了足够的PBSCs。年龄越小(p = 0.004)、使用 G-CSF 第 4 天的 PB CD34+ 细胞计数越高(p < 0.001)和男性供体(p = 0.010)与 PBSCs 产量的增加相关。通过单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析预测了非常好的动员者(第一次血液净化后收集的 PBSCs ≥8 × 106/kg)。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,男性性别(p = 0.004)、G-CSF 第 4 天的 PB CD34+ 细胞计数≥100/μL(p < 0.001)和肾小球滤过率≥115 mL/min(p = 0.031)被认为是证明动员效果非常好的独立预测因素。结论看来,在给予 G-CSF 的第 4 天开始无细胞疗法是有效的,并能使健康供体的 G-CSF 暴露最小化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single Apheresis Session on the 4th Day of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Administration Seems Convenient to Collect Enough Peripheral Blood Stem Cells from Healthy Donors
Background: To minimize adverse events of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection in healthy donors, it is reasonable to limit the total dose of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and/or the number of apheresis days without decreasing of PBSCs yield. Therefore, we have started to collect G-CSF induced PBSCs on day 4 instead of on day 5. So, we retrospectively aimed to investigate the results of this 4-day G-CSF administration. Study Design and Methods: Seventy-six healthy donors who performed on G-CSF induced PBSCs donation consecutively between January 2020 and July 2022 were included in this study. G-CSF (filgrastim) at 2 × 5 µg/kg/day subcutaneously was applied. Apheresis started on day 4. Results: Sixty-nine (90.8%) of 76 donors provided enough PBSCs on day 4 apheresis session. Younger age (p = 0.004), higher PB CD34+ cell count on the 4th day of G-CSF (p < 0.001), and male donor (p = 0.010) were correlated with increased amounts of PBSCs yield. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to predict very good mobilizers (collected PBSCs ≥8 × 106/kg after the first apheresis) were performed. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, male sex (p = 0.004), PB CD34+ cell count ≥100/µL on the 4th day of G-CSF (p < 0.001), and glomerular filtration rate ≥115 mL/min (p = 0.031) were found to be independent predicting factors to demonstrate very good mobilizer. Conclusion: It seems that starting the apheresis on the 4th day of G-CSF administration is effective and to provide minimal G-CSF exposure in healthy donors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信