Mariluz Rojo Domingo, D. Do, C. Conlin, Aditya Bagrodia, Tristan Barrett, Madison T Baxter, Matthew Cooperberg, Felix Feng, M. E. Hahn, M. Harisinghani, G. Hollenberg, Juan Javier-Desloges, Karoline Kallis, Sophia Kamran, Christopher J. Kane, Dimitri Kessler, J. Kuperman, Kang-Lung Lee, Jonathan Levine, Michael A. Liss, D. Margolis, Ian Matthews, Paul M Murphy, Nabih Nakrour, Michael Ohliger, C. Ollison, Thomas Osinski, Anthony J. Pamatmat, Isabella R Pompa, R. Rakow-Penner, Jacob L Roberts, Karan Santhosh, A. Shabaik, Yuze Song, David Song, C. M. Tempany, Natasha Wehrli, E. Weinberg, Sean Woolen, George Xu, A. Y. Zhong, Anders M. Dale, Tyler M Seibert
{"title":"限制性频谱成像作为前列腺癌的定量生物标记物,具有可靠的阳性预测价值","authors":"Mariluz Rojo Domingo, D. Do, C. Conlin, Aditya Bagrodia, Tristan Barrett, Madison T Baxter, Matthew Cooperberg, Felix Feng, M. E. Hahn, M. Harisinghani, G. Hollenberg, Juan Javier-Desloges, Karoline Kallis, Sophia Kamran, Christopher J. Kane, Dimitri Kessler, J. Kuperman, Kang-Lung Lee, Jonathan Levine, Michael A. Liss, D. Margolis, Ian Matthews, Paul M Murphy, Nabih Nakrour, Michael Ohliger, C. Ollison, Thomas Osinski, Anthony J. Pamatmat, Isabella R Pompa, R. Rakow-Penner, Jacob L Roberts, Karan Santhosh, A. Shabaik, Yuze Song, David Song, C. M. Tempany, Natasha Wehrli, E. Weinberg, Sean Woolen, George Xu, A. Y. Zhong, Anders M. Dale, Tyler M Seibert","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.05.24308468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objective. Positive predictive value of PI-RADS for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, grade group [GG][≥]2) varies widely between institutions and radiologists. The Restriction Spectrum Imaging restriction score (RSIrs) is a metric derived from diffusion MRI that could be an objectively interpretable biomarker for csPCa. Methods. In patients scanned for suspected or known csPCa at 7 centers, we calculated patient-level csPCa probability based on maximum RSIrs in the prostate, without relying on subjectively defined lesions. We used area under the ROC curve (AUC) to compare patient-level csPCa detection for RSIrs, ADC, and PI-RADS. Finally, we combined RSIrs with clinical risk factors via multivariable regression, training in a single-center cohort and testing in an independent, multi-center dataset. Key Findings and Limitations. Among all patients (n=1892), probability of csPCa increased with higher RSIrs. GG[≥]4 csPCa was most common in patients with very high RSIrs. Among biopsy-naive patients (n=877), AUCs for GG[≥]2 vs. non-csPCa were 0.73 (0.69-0.76), 0.54 (0.50-0.57), and 0.75 (0.71-0.78) for RSIrs, ADC, and PI-RADS, respectively. RSIrs significantly outperformed ADC (p<0.01) and was comparable to PI-RADS (p=0.31). The combination of RSIrs and PI-RADS outperformed either alone. Combining RSIrs with PI-RADS, age, and PSA density in a multivariable model achieved the best discrimination of csPCa. Conclusions and Clinical Implications. RSIrs is an accurate and reliable quantitative biomarker that performs better than conventional ADC and comparably to expert-defined PI-RADS for patient-level detection of csPCa. RSIrs provides objective estimates of probability of csPCa that do not require radiology expertise.","PeriodicalId":506788,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv","volume":"19 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Restriction Spectrum Imaging as a quantitative biomarker for prostate cancer with reliable positive predictive value\",\"authors\":\"Mariluz Rojo Domingo, D. Do, C. Conlin, Aditya Bagrodia, Tristan Barrett, Madison T Baxter, Matthew Cooperberg, Felix Feng, M. E. Hahn, M. Harisinghani, G. Hollenberg, Juan Javier-Desloges, Karoline Kallis, Sophia Kamran, Christopher J. Kane, Dimitri Kessler, J. Kuperman, Kang-Lung Lee, Jonathan Levine, Michael A. Liss, D. Margolis, Ian Matthews, Paul M Murphy, Nabih Nakrour, Michael Ohliger, C. Ollison, Thomas Osinski, Anthony J. Pamatmat, Isabella R Pompa, R. Rakow-Penner, Jacob L Roberts, Karan Santhosh, A. Shabaik, Yuze Song, David Song, C. M. Tempany, Natasha Wehrli, E. Weinberg, Sean Woolen, George Xu, A. Y. Zhong, Anders M. Dale, Tyler M Seibert\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.06.05.24308468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Objective. Positive predictive value of PI-RADS for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, grade group [GG][≥]2) varies widely between institutions and radiologists. The Restriction Spectrum Imaging restriction score (RSIrs) is a metric derived from diffusion MRI that could be an objectively interpretable biomarker for csPCa. Methods. In patients scanned for suspected or known csPCa at 7 centers, we calculated patient-level csPCa probability based on maximum RSIrs in the prostate, without relying on subjectively defined lesions. We used area under the ROC curve (AUC) to compare patient-level csPCa detection for RSIrs, ADC, and PI-RADS. Finally, we combined RSIrs with clinical risk factors via multivariable regression, training in a single-center cohort and testing in an independent, multi-center dataset. Key Findings and Limitations. Among all patients (n=1892), probability of csPCa increased with higher RSIrs. GG[≥]4 csPCa was most common in patients with very high RSIrs. Among biopsy-naive patients (n=877), AUCs for GG[≥]2 vs. non-csPCa were 0.73 (0.69-0.76), 0.54 (0.50-0.57), and 0.75 (0.71-0.78) for RSIrs, ADC, and PI-RADS, respectively. RSIrs significantly outperformed ADC (p<0.01) and was comparable to PI-RADS (p=0.31). The combination of RSIrs and PI-RADS outperformed either alone. Combining RSIrs with PI-RADS, age, and PSA density in a multivariable model achieved the best discrimination of csPCa. Conclusions and Clinical Implications. RSIrs is an accurate and reliable quantitative biomarker that performs better than conventional ADC and comparably to expert-defined PI-RADS for patient-level detection of csPCa. RSIrs provides objective estimates of probability of csPCa that do not require radiology expertise.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv\",\"volume\":\"19 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.05.24308468\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.05.24308468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Restriction Spectrum Imaging as a quantitative biomarker for prostate cancer with reliable positive predictive value
Background and Objective. Positive predictive value of PI-RADS for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, grade group [GG][≥]2) varies widely between institutions and radiologists. The Restriction Spectrum Imaging restriction score (RSIrs) is a metric derived from diffusion MRI that could be an objectively interpretable biomarker for csPCa. Methods. In patients scanned for suspected or known csPCa at 7 centers, we calculated patient-level csPCa probability based on maximum RSIrs in the prostate, without relying on subjectively defined lesions. We used area under the ROC curve (AUC) to compare patient-level csPCa detection for RSIrs, ADC, and PI-RADS. Finally, we combined RSIrs with clinical risk factors via multivariable regression, training in a single-center cohort and testing in an independent, multi-center dataset. Key Findings and Limitations. Among all patients (n=1892), probability of csPCa increased with higher RSIrs. GG[≥]4 csPCa was most common in patients with very high RSIrs. Among biopsy-naive patients (n=877), AUCs for GG[≥]2 vs. non-csPCa were 0.73 (0.69-0.76), 0.54 (0.50-0.57), and 0.75 (0.71-0.78) for RSIrs, ADC, and PI-RADS, respectively. RSIrs significantly outperformed ADC (p<0.01) and was comparable to PI-RADS (p=0.31). The combination of RSIrs and PI-RADS outperformed either alone. Combining RSIrs with PI-RADS, age, and PSA density in a multivariable model achieved the best discrimination of csPCa. Conclusions and Clinical Implications. RSIrs is an accurate and reliable quantitative biomarker that performs better than conventional ADC and comparably to expert-defined PI-RADS for patient-level detection of csPCa. RSIrs provides objective estimates of probability of csPCa that do not require radiology expertise.