{"title":"表面关系:Vivian L. Huang 所著的《亚裔美国人不明确性的同性恋形式》(评论)","authors":"Takeo Rivera","doi":"10.1353/tj.2024.a929536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Surface Relations: Queer Forms of Asian American Inscrutability</em> by Vivian L. Huang <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Takeo Rivera </li> </ul> <em>Surface Relations: Queer Forms of Asian American Inscrutability</em>. By Vivian L. Huang. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2022; pp. 240. <p>From the foundations laid by scholars like Josephine Lee, Karen Shimakawa, Esther Kim Lee, Joshua Takano Chambers-Letson, Sean Metzger, and more, Asian American performance studies has become an indispensable subfield within theatre and performance studies. While it is difficult to claim any Asian American subjective “exceptionalism” to performance, the performance of affect—or the perceived lack thereof—is a key facet of ongoing racialized and racist apparatuses of orientalism and yellow peril. After all, the unfeeling, inscrutable Asiatic is the figure upon which the anxieties of deindividuation, and the corresponding abject expulsion, are deposited. Building on the more theatre-driven scholarly predecessors listed above, Vivian L. Huang’s <em>Surface Relations: Queer Forms of Asian American Inscrutability</em> takes this theoretical concern head on, advancing Asian American performance studies to new heights in its study of <strong>[End Page 130]</strong> queer Asian American performance art and theorizations of gender.</p> <p>At this point, this review is unlikely to spark more excitement for Huang’s monograph debut than has already been generated—<em>Surface Relations</em> was a nominee for the 2023 Lambda Literary Award for LGBTQ+ Studies—but, to put it bluntly, the hype is deserved. Contrary to its name, <em>Surface Relations</em> is itself less a surface than it is a cord, woven from the most vital threads of performance, ethnic, and queer studies to date. The book provides a vital contribution well beyond the Venn diagram sliver between performance studies and Asian American studies. Huang states their intentions clearly in the introduction, stating that the book “considers minoritarian aesthetic and affective modes of inscrutability that negotiate formal legibility with sociopolitical viability” that are in turn “vital acts of world-making in a cultural landscape that has normalized the non-appearance of Asian American culture” (2). Rather than simply condemning Asiaticized inscrutability as a kind of harmful stereotype to be disavowed, Huang explores inscrutability as queer performative strategy for Asian American subjects. Huang’s examples offer a number of diverse strategic effects that vary chapter to chapter, from the production of tenderly queer social relationalities, or the subversion of patriarchal epistemologies, to the disruption of model minority labor relations. Inscrutability rarely inspires political militancy, but rather a subtler, almost clandestine reconfiguration of subjective and performative logics. In this regard, <em>Surface Relations</em> joins Sunny Xiang’s <em>Tonal Intelligence: The Aesthetics of Asian Inscrutability during the Long Cold War</em> (2020) and Xine Yao’s <em>Disaffected: The Cultural Politics of Unfeeling in Nineteenth-Century America</em> (2021) as another recent text to consider the racialization of affective flatness and its redemptive rereading, albeit with a completely different archive.</p> <p>This critical move of reclamation empowerment has become a familiar one in cultural studies, which owes much of its political imagination to José Esteban Muñoz’s <em>Disidentifications</em> and <em>Cruising Utopia</em>. In fact, this opening framing may tempt the reader to take Huang’s argument at its <em>surface</em> level and to stop reading at the introduction, quoting the most direct passages in a way most useful to their writing, as one is wont to do in time-crunched contemporary academia. However, I would argue that Huang’s body chapters considerably transcend its opening argument—cheekily, I insist that <em>Surface Relations</em> be read <em>deeply</em>. While the text undeniably coheres around the theme of inscrutability, much of Huang’s best content in <em>Surface Relations</em> is primarily about its related subjects.</p> <p>Cases in point are <em>Surface Relations</em>’ second and third chapters, which offer some of the most compelling theorizations of Asian American gender written in years. Chapter 2—an earlier form of which was published as an influential essay in <em>Women & Performance</em> in 2018—provides a thoughtful, rich theorization of “parasitic hospitability” in Asian American femininity, focusing on performance artists Yoko Ono, Laurel Nakadate, and Emma Sulkowicz. Deftly drawing from Jacques Derrida and Michel Serres, Huang provides a fascinating framework for Asian American femininity that operates with and against overdetermined narratives of subservience, considering the subversions and disruptions that emerge from queer excesses and performative interventions into consent...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":46247,"journal":{"name":"THEATRE JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surface Relations: Queer Forms of Asian American Inscrutability by Vivian L. Huang (review)\",\"authors\":\"Takeo Rivera\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/tj.2024.a929536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Surface Relations: Queer Forms of Asian American Inscrutability</em> by Vivian L. Huang <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Takeo Rivera </li> </ul> <em>Surface Relations: Queer Forms of Asian American Inscrutability</em>. By Vivian L. Huang. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2022; pp. 240. <p>From the foundations laid by scholars like Josephine Lee, Karen Shimakawa, Esther Kim Lee, Joshua Takano Chambers-Letson, Sean Metzger, and more, Asian American performance studies has become an indispensable subfield within theatre and performance studies. While it is difficult to claim any Asian American subjective “exceptionalism” to performance, the performance of affect—or the perceived lack thereof—is a key facet of ongoing racialized and racist apparatuses of orientalism and yellow peril. After all, the unfeeling, inscrutable Asiatic is the figure upon which the anxieties of deindividuation, and the corresponding abject expulsion, are deposited. Building on the more theatre-driven scholarly predecessors listed above, Vivian L. Huang’s <em>Surface Relations: Queer Forms of Asian American Inscrutability</em> takes this theoretical concern head on, advancing Asian American performance studies to new heights in its study of <strong>[End Page 130]</strong> queer Asian American performance art and theorizations of gender.</p> <p>At this point, this review is unlikely to spark more excitement for Huang’s monograph debut than has already been generated—<em>Surface Relations</em> was a nominee for the 2023 Lambda Literary Award for LGBTQ+ Studies—but, to put it bluntly, the hype is deserved. Contrary to its name, <em>Surface Relations</em> is itself less a surface than it is a cord, woven from the most vital threads of performance, ethnic, and queer studies to date. The book provides a vital contribution well beyond the Venn diagram sliver between performance studies and Asian American studies. Huang states their intentions clearly in the introduction, stating that the book “considers minoritarian aesthetic and affective modes of inscrutability that negotiate formal legibility with sociopolitical viability” that are in turn “vital acts of world-making in a cultural landscape that has normalized the non-appearance of Asian American culture” (2). Rather than simply condemning Asiaticized inscrutability as a kind of harmful stereotype to be disavowed, Huang explores inscrutability as queer performative strategy for Asian American subjects. Huang’s examples offer a number of diverse strategic effects that vary chapter to chapter, from the production of tenderly queer social relationalities, or the subversion of patriarchal epistemologies, to the disruption of model minority labor relations. Inscrutability rarely inspires political militancy, but rather a subtler, almost clandestine reconfiguration of subjective and performative logics. In this regard, <em>Surface Relations</em> joins Sunny Xiang’s <em>Tonal Intelligence: The Aesthetics of Asian Inscrutability during the Long Cold War</em> (2020) and Xine Yao’s <em>Disaffected: The Cultural Politics of Unfeeling in Nineteenth-Century America</em> (2021) as another recent text to consider the racialization of affective flatness and its redemptive rereading, albeit with a completely different archive.</p> <p>This critical move of reclamation empowerment has become a familiar one in cultural studies, which owes much of its political imagination to José Esteban Muñoz’s <em>Disidentifications</em> and <em>Cruising Utopia</em>. In fact, this opening framing may tempt the reader to take Huang’s argument at its <em>surface</em> level and to stop reading at the introduction, quoting the most direct passages in a way most useful to their writing, as one is wont to do in time-crunched contemporary academia. However, I would argue that Huang’s body chapters considerably transcend its opening argument—cheekily, I insist that <em>Surface Relations</em> be read <em>deeply</em>. While the text undeniably coheres around the theme of inscrutability, much of Huang’s best content in <em>Surface Relations</em> is primarily about its related subjects.</p> <p>Cases in point are <em>Surface Relations</em>’ second and third chapters, which offer some of the most compelling theorizations of Asian American gender written in years. Chapter 2—an earlier form of which was published as an influential essay in <em>Women & Performance</em> in 2018—provides a thoughtful, rich theorization of “parasitic hospitability” in Asian American femininity, focusing on performance artists Yoko Ono, Laurel Nakadate, and Emma Sulkowicz. Deftly drawing from Jacques Derrida and Michel Serres, Huang provides a fascinating framework for Asian American femininity that operates with and against overdetermined narratives of subservience, considering the subversions and disruptions that emerge from queer excesses and performative interventions into consent...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THEATRE JOURNAL\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THEATRE JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/tj.2024.a929536\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THEATRE JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tj.2024.a929536","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: 表面关系:Vivian L. Huang Takeo Rivera 著 Surface Relations:亚裔美国人不明确性的同性恋形式》。作者:Vivian L. Huang。北卡罗来纳州达勒姆:杜克大学出版社,2022 年;第 240 页。从李约瑟、凯伦-岛川、埃斯特-金-李、约书亚-高野-钱伯斯-莱森、肖恩-梅茨格等学者奠定的基础开始,亚裔美国人表演研究已经成为戏剧和表演研究中不可或缺的子领域。虽然很难说亚裔美国人的表演主观上有什么 "特殊性",但情感的表演--或被认为缺乏情感的表演--是东方主义和黄色危险的持续种族化和种族主义机制的一个关键方面。毕竟,无情无义、高深莫测的亚洲人是去个性化的焦虑以及相应的卑劣驱逐所寄托的形象。黄薇薇(Vivian L. Huang)的《表面关系》(Surface Relations:黄薇薇的《表面关系:亚裔美国人的同性恋形式》(Surface Relations: Queer Forms of Asian American Inscrutability)直面这一理论问题,将亚裔美国人的表演研究推向了新的高度,对亚裔美国人的同性恋表演艺术和性别理论进行了研究。在这一点上,这篇评论不太可能为黄的专著处女作带来更多的兴奋--《表面关系》是 2023 年兰姆达文学奖 LGBTQ+ 研究奖的提名作品,但直截了当地说,这种兴奋是实至名归的。与书名相反,《表面关系》本身与其说是 "表面",不如说是 "线",是由表演、种族和同性恋研究领域迄今为止最重要的线索编织而成的。该书的重要贡献远远超出了表演研究和亚裔美国人研究之间的维恩图解。黄在序言中明确阐述了他们的意图,指出该书 "考虑了少数派美学和情感的不可捉摸性模式,这些模式将形式上的可辨认性与社会政治上的可行性进行了协商",反过来,这些模式又是 "在将亚裔美国人文化不露面正常化的文化景观中创造世界的重要行为"(2)。黄氏并没有简单地将亚裔化的不可捉摸性谴责为一种应予摒弃的有害刻板印象,而是探讨了不可捉摸性作为亚裔美国人的同性恋表演策略。黄的例子提供了许多不同的策略效果,这些效果因章节而异,有的产生了温柔的同性恋社会关系,有的颠覆了父权制认识论,有的破坏了模范少数族裔的劳资关系。不可破坏性很少激发政治上的战斗性,而是一种更微妙的、近乎秘密的主观和表演逻辑的重新配置。在这方面,《表面关系》与 Sunny Xiang 的《音调的智慧》(Tonal Intelligence:在这方面,《表面关系》与 Sunny Xiang 的《音调的智慧:漫长冷战时期亚洲的不可捉摸性美学》(2020 年)和 Xine Yao 的《心怀不满:尽管档案完全不同,但《表面现象》和姚锡恩的《心怀不满:十九世纪美国无情的文化政治》(2021 年)是近期另一部思考情感平淡的种族化及其救赎性重读的文本。文化研究的政治想象力在很大程度上要归功于何塞-埃斯特万-穆尼奥斯(José Esteban Muñoz)的《异化》(Disidentifications)和《乌托邦巡游》(Cruising Utopia)。事实上,这样的开篇框架可能会诱使读者从表面上理解黄宗智的论点,并在引言处停止阅读,以最有利于自己写作的方式引用最直接的段落,这也是时间紧迫的当代学术界的惯常做法。然而,我想说的是,黄氏的正文章节在很大程度上超越了其开篇论点--厚颜无耻地说,我坚持要深入阅读《表面关系》。不可否认,《表面关系》围绕 "不可捉摸性 "这一主题展开,但黄氏在《表面关系》中的许多精彩内容主要是关于其相关主题的。表面关系》的第二章和第三章就是很好的例子,这两章对亚裔美国人的性别问题进行了多年来最有说服力的理论阐述。第二章--其早期形式曾作为一篇有影响力的论文发表在2018年的《女性与印记》(Women & Performance)上--以行为艺术家小野洋子(Yoko Ono)、中馆劳雷尔(Laurel Nakadate)和艾玛-苏尔科维奇(Emma Sulkowicz)为中心,对亚裔美国女性的 "寄生好客 "进行了深思熟虑、内容丰富的理论阐述。黄巧妙地借鉴雅克-德里达(Jacques Derrida)和米歇尔-塞雷斯(Michel Serres)的观点,为美国亚裔女性提供了一个引人入胜的框架,该框架与过度确定的顺从叙事相互影响,并考虑到同性恋过度行为和对同意的表演性干预所产生的颠覆和破坏......
Surface Relations: Queer Forms of Asian American Inscrutability by Vivian L. Huang (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:
Reviewed by:
Surface Relations: Queer Forms of Asian American Inscrutability by Vivian L. Huang
Takeo Rivera
Surface Relations: Queer Forms of Asian American Inscrutability. By Vivian L. Huang. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2022; pp. 240.
From the foundations laid by scholars like Josephine Lee, Karen Shimakawa, Esther Kim Lee, Joshua Takano Chambers-Letson, Sean Metzger, and more, Asian American performance studies has become an indispensable subfield within theatre and performance studies. While it is difficult to claim any Asian American subjective “exceptionalism” to performance, the performance of affect—or the perceived lack thereof—is a key facet of ongoing racialized and racist apparatuses of orientalism and yellow peril. After all, the unfeeling, inscrutable Asiatic is the figure upon which the anxieties of deindividuation, and the corresponding abject expulsion, are deposited. Building on the more theatre-driven scholarly predecessors listed above, Vivian L. Huang’s Surface Relations: Queer Forms of Asian American Inscrutability takes this theoretical concern head on, advancing Asian American performance studies to new heights in its study of [End Page 130] queer Asian American performance art and theorizations of gender.
At this point, this review is unlikely to spark more excitement for Huang’s monograph debut than has already been generated—Surface Relations was a nominee for the 2023 Lambda Literary Award for LGBTQ+ Studies—but, to put it bluntly, the hype is deserved. Contrary to its name, Surface Relations is itself less a surface than it is a cord, woven from the most vital threads of performance, ethnic, and queer studies to date. The book provides a vital contribution well beyond the Venn diagram sliver between performance studies and Asian American studies. Huang states their intentions clearly in the introduction, stating that the book “considers minoritarian aesthetic and affective modes of inscrutability that negotiate formal legibility with sociopolitical viability” that are in turn “vital acts of world-making in a cultural landscape that has normalized the non-appearance of Asian American culture” (2). Rather than simply condemning Asiaticized inscrutability as a kind of harmful stereotype to be disavowed, Huang explores inscrutability as queer performative strategy for Asian American subjects. Huang’s examples offer a number of diverse strategic effects that vary chapter to chapter, from the production of tenderly queer social relationalities, or the subversion of patriarchal epistemologies, to the disruption of model minority labor relations. Inscrutability rarely inspires political militancy, but rather a subtler, almost clandestine reconfiguration of subjective and performative logics. In this regard, Surface Relations joins Sunny Xiang’s Tonal Intelligence: The Aesthetics of Asian Inscrutability during the Long Cold War (2020) and Xine Yao’s Disaffected: The Cultural Politics of Unfeeling in Nineteenth-Century America (2021) as another recent text to consider the racialization of affective flatness and its redemptive rereading, albeit with a completely different archive.
This critical move of reclamation empowerment has become a familiar one in cultural studies, which owes much of its political imagination to José Esteban Muñoz’s Disidentifications and Cruising Utopia. In fact, this opening framing may tempt the reader to take Huang’s argument at its surface level and to stop reading at the introduction, quoting the most direct passages in a way most useful to their writing, as one is wont to do in time-crunched contemporary academia. However, I would argue that Huang’s body chapters considerably transcend its opening argument—cheekily, I insist that Surface Relations be read deeply. While the text undeniably coheres around the theme of inscrutability, much of Huang’s best content in Surface Relations is primarily about its related subjects.
Cases in point are Surface Relations’ second and third chapters, which offer some of the most compelling theorizations of Asian American gender written in years. Chapter 2—an earlier form of which was published as an influential essay in Women & Performance in 2018—provides a thoughtful, rich theorization of “parasitic hospitability” in Asian American femininity, focusing on performance artists Yoko Ono, Laurel Nakadate, and Emma Sulkowicz. Deftly drawing from Jacques Derrida and Michel Serres, Huang provides a fascinating framework for Asian American femininity that operates with and against overdetermined narratives of subservience, considering the subversions and disruptions that emerge from queer excesses and performative interventions into consent...
期刊介绍:
For over five decades, Theatre Journal"s broad array of scholarly articles and reviews has earned it an international reputation as one of the most authoritative and useful publications of theatre studies available today. Drawing contributions from noted practitioners and scholars, Theatre Journal features social and historical studies, production reviews, and theoretical inquiries that analyze dramatic texts and production.