MRCP 对胆管损伤严重程度的误读。

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
South African Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-05-01
M Bhana, M Bernon, J C Kloppers, E Jonas
{"title":"MRCP 对胆管损伤严重程度的误读。","authors":"M Bhana, M Bernon, J C Kloppers, E Jonas","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely regarded as the gold standard for assessment of the bile ducts in patients with bile duct injuries (BDIs). This case series aims to highlight the shortcomings of this imaging modality and demonstrate how it may overestimate the injury severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three patients treated at Groote Schuur Hospital and the University of Cape Town in whom MRI/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) overestimated the severity of BDI were included in the study. Demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, blood results and imaging findings are presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients had an MRI/MRCP done which assessed the BDIs as major complete cut-off of the proximal common hepatic duct with substance loss. Subsequent direct cholangiography showed minor injuries and all three patients were successfully managed with endoscopic stenting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Major BDIs are complex, and assessment of severity is intricate and may be overestimated. These patients are best managed in high-volume multidisciplinary team settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51161,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Surgery","volume":"62 2","pages":"70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Misinterpretation of the severity of bile duct injuries by MRCP.\",\"authors\":\"M Bhana, M Bernon, J C Kloppers, E Jonas\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely regarded as the gold standard for assessment of the bile ducts in patients with bile duct injuries (BDIs). This case series aims to highlight the shortcomings of this imaging modality and demonstrate how it may overestimate the injury severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three patients treated at Groote Schuur Hospital and the University of Cape Town in whom MRI/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) overestimated the severity of BDI were included in the study. Demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, blood results and imaging findings are presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients had an MRI/MRCP done which assessed the BDIs as major complete cut-off of the proximal common hepatic duct with substance loss. Subsequent direct cholangiography showed minor injuries and all three patients were successfully managed with endoscopic stenting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Major BDIs are complex, and assessment of severity is intricate and may be overestimated. These patients are best managed in high-volume multidisciplinary team settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"62 2\",\"pages\":\"70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:磁共振成像(MRI)被广泛认为是评估胆管损伤(BDI)患者胆管情况的金标准。本病例系列旨在强调这种成像方式的缺点,并说明它可能会高估损伤的严重程度:本研究纳入了三位在格罗特舒尔医院(Groote Schuur Hospital)和开普敦大学(University of Cape Town)接受治疗的患者,这些患者的磁共振/磁共振胆管胰管造影(MRCP)高估了胆管损伤(BDI)的严重程度。研究结果显示了人口统计学特征、临床表现、血液结果和成像结果:结果:所有患者都接受了 MRI/MRCP,评估结果显示 BDI 为近端总肝管严重完全切断,且有物质丢失。随后的直接胆管造影显示损伤较轻,三位患者均成功接受了内镜下支架置入术:结论:重大 BDI 非常复杂,严重程度的评估错综复杂,可能会被高估。这些患者最好在多学科团队的大容量环境下进行处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Misinterpretation of the severity of bile duct injuries by MRCP.

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely regarded as the gold standard for assessment of the bile ducts in patients with bile duct injuries (BDIs). This case series aims to highlight the shortcomings of this imaging modality and demonstrate how it may overestimate the injury severity.

Methods: Three patients treated at Groote Schuur Hospital and the University of Cape Town in whom MRI/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) overestimated the severity of BDI were included in the study. Demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, blood results and imaging findings are presented.

Results: All patients had an MRI/MRCP done which assessed the BDIs as major complete cut-off of the proximal common hepatic duct with substance loss. Subsequent direct cholangiography showed minor injuries and all three patients were successfully managed with endoscopic stenting.

Conclusion: Major BDIs are complex, and assessment of severity is intricate and may be overestimated. These patients are best managed in high-volume multidisciplinary team settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Surgery (SAJS) is a quarterly, general surgical journal. It carries research articles and letters, editorials, clinical practice and other surgical articles and personal opinion, South African health-related news, obituaries and general correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信