体质异常的常规细胞遗传学分析:美国病理学家学会/美国医学遗传学和基因组学学会细胞遗传学委员会 20 年能力测试结果回顾》(A 20-Year Review of Proficiency Test Results From the College of American Pathologists/American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Cytogenetics Committee)。

Brittney Boles, Juli-Anne Gardner, Catherine W Rehder, Brynn Levy, Gopalrao V Velagaleti, Reha M Toydemir, William R Sukov, Daniel P Larson, Yang Cao, Christopher Mixon, Rachel K Vanderscheldon, Ying S Zou, Caroline Astbury, Karen D Tsuchiya, Jess F Peterson
{"title":"体质异常的常规细胞遗传学分析:美国病理学家学会/美国医学遗传学和基因组学学会细胞遗传学委员会 20 年能力测试结果回顾》(A 20-Year Review of Proficiency Test Results From the College of American Pathologists/American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Cytogenetics Committee)。","authors":"Brittney Boles, Juli-Anne Gardner, Catherine W Rehder, Brynn Levy, Gopalrao V Velagaleti, Reha M Toydemir, William R Sukov, Daniel P Larson, Yang Cao, Christopher Mixon, Rachel K Vanderscheldon, Ying S Zou, Caroline Astbury, Karen D Tsuchiya, Jess F Peterson","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2024-0048-CP","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>The joint College of American Pathologists/American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Cytogenetics Committee works to ensure competency and proficiency of clinical cytogenetics testing laboratories through proficiency testing programs for various clinical tests offered by such laboratories, including the evaluation of constitutional abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To review and analyze 20 years of constitutional chromosome analysis proficiency testing results (2003-2022), primarily utilizing G-banded karyograms.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>A retrospective review of results from 2003 through 2022 was performed, identifying challenges addressing constitutional disorders. The chromosomal abnormalities and overall performance were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>A total of 184 cases from 161 proficiency testing challenges were administered from 2003 through 2022. Challenges consisted of metaphase images and accompanying clinical history for evaluation of numerical and/or structural abnormalities. Of the 184 cases, only 2 (1%) failed to reach an 80% grading consensus for recognition of the abnormality. Both cases illustrated the limitations of correctly characterizing some chromosomal abnormalities, including recombinant chromosomal abnormalities and isochromosome identification. In addition, 2 cases failed to reach a consensus for nomenclature reporting: 1 with an isochromosome and another with a duplication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>This 20-year review illustrates the high rate of competency and proficiency of cytogenetic laboratories in the correct identification of constitutional chromosome abnormalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conventional Cytogenetic Analysis of Constitutional Abnormalities: A 20-Year Review of Proficiency Test Results From the College of American Pathologists/American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Cytogenetics Committee.\",\"authors\":\"Brittney Boles, Juli-Anne Gardner, Catherine W Rehder, Brynn Levy, Gopalrao V Velagaleti, Reha M Toydemir, William R Sukov, Daniel P Larson, Yang Cao, Christopher Mixon, Rachel K Vanderscheldon, Ying S Zou, Caroline Astbury, Karen D Tsuchiya, Jess F Peterson\",\"doi\":\"10.5858/arpa.2024-0048-CP\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>The joint College of American Pathologists/American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Cytogenetics Committee works to ensure competency and proficiency of clinical cytogenetics testing laboratories through proficiency testing programs for various clinical tests offered by such laboratories, including the evaluation of constitutional abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To review and analyze 20 years of constitutional chromosome analysis proficiency testing results (2003-2022), primarily utilizing G-banded karyograms.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>A retrospective review of results from 2003 through 2022 was performed, identifying challenges addressing constitutional disorders. The chromosomal abnormalities and overall performance were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>A total of 184 cases from 161 proficiency testing challenges were administered from 2003 through 2022. Challenges consisted of metaphase images and accompanying clinical history for evaluation of numerical and/or structural abnormalities. Of the 184 cases, only 2 (1%) failed to reach an 80% grading consensus for recognition of the abnormality. Both cases illustrated the limitations of correctly characterizing some chromosomal abnormalities, including recombinant chromosomal abnormalities and isochromosome identification. In addition, 2 cases failed to reach a consensus for nomenclature reporting: 1 with an isochromosome and another with a duplication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>This 20-year review illustrates the high rate of competency and proficiency of cytogenetic laboratories in the correct identification of constitutional chromosome abnormalities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2024-0048-CP\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2024-0048-CP","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景美国病理学家学会/美国医学遗传学和基因组学学会细胞遗传学联合委员会致力于通过对临床细胞遗传学检测实验室提供的各种临床检测项目(包括体质异常评估)进行能力验证,确保这些实验室的能力和水平:回顾并分析 20 年来(2003-2022 年)的体质染色体分析能力测试结果,主要利用 G 带核型图:对 2003 年至 2022 年的结果进行回顾性分析,找出解决染色体异常所面临的挑战。结果:从 2003 年到 2022 年,共进行了 161 次能力验证挑战,其中包括 184 个病例。测试内容包括核分裂期图像和随附的临床病史,用于评估数量和/或结构异常。在 184 个病例中,只有 2 个病例(1%)在识别异常方面未能达成 80% 的分级共识。这两个病例都说明了正确鉴定某些染色体异常的局限性,包括重组染色体异常和同源染色体鉴定。此外,有两个病例未能就命名报告达成共识:结论:20年来的回顾表明,细胞遗传实验室在正确识别染色体异常方面的能力和熟练程度都很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conventional Cytogenetic Analysis of Constitutional Abnormalities: A 20-Year Review of Proficiency Test Results From the College of American Pathologists/American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Cytogenetics Committee.

Context.—: The joint College of American Pathologists/American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Cytogenetics Committee works to ensure competency and proficiency of clinical cytogenetics testing laboratories through proficiency testing programs for various clinical tests offered by such laboratories, including the evaluation of constitutional abnormalities.

Objective.—: To review and analyze 20 years of constitutional chromosome analysis proficiency testing results (2003-2022), primarily utilizing G-banded karyograms.

Design.—: A retrospective review of results from 2003 through 2022 was performed, identifying challenges addressing constitutional disorders. The chromosomal abnormalities and overall performance were evaluated.

Results.—: A total of 184 cases from 161 proficiency testing challenges were administered from 2003 through 2022. Challenges consisted of metaphase images and accompanying clinical history for evaluation of numerical and/or structural abnormalities. Of the 184 cases, only 2 (1%) failed to reach an 80% grading consensus for recognition of the abnormality. Both cases illustrated the limitations of correctly characterizing some chromosomal abnormalities, including recombinant chromosomal abnormalities and isochromosome identification. In addition, 2 cases failed to reach a consensus for nomenclature reporting: 1 with an isochromosome and another with a duplication.

Conclusions.—: This 20-year review illustrates the high rate of competency and proficiency of cytogenetic laboratories in the correct identification of constitutional chromosome abnormalities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信