在成人活体肝移植中,通过结扎脾动脉调节移植物血流以实现门静脉高灌注不会降低早期同种移植物功能障碍的发生率:随机对照试验

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Annals of surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006369
Viniyendra Pamecha, Gattu Tharun, Nilesh Sadashiv Patil, Nihar Mohapatra, Anubhav Kumar, Shalini Thapar, Gaurav Sindwani, Udit Dhingra, Anil Yadav
{"title":"在成人活体肝移植中,通过结扎脾动脉调节移植物血流以实现门静脉高灌注不会降低早期同种移植物功能障碍的发生率:随机对照试验","authors":"Viniyendra Pamecha, Gattu Tharun, Nilesh Sadashiv Patil, Nihar Mohapatra, Anubhav Kumar, Shalini Thapar, Gaurav Sindwani, Udit Dhingra, Anil Yadav","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective was to compare the rates of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) in patients undergoing elective adult live donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) with and without graft portal inflow modulation (GIM) for portal hyperperfusion. The secondary objectives were to compare time to normalization of bilirubin and International Normalized Ratio, day 14 ascitic output more than 1 L, small-for-size syndrome, intensive care unit/high dependency unit and total hospital stay, and 90-day morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>GIM can prevent EAD in ALDLT patients with portal hyperperfusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center randomized trial with and without GIM for portal hyperperfusion by splenic artery ligation (SAL) in ALDLT was performed. After reperfusion, patients with portal venous pressure (PVP)>15 mm Hg with a gradient (PVP-central venous pressure) of ≥7 mm Hg and/or portal venous flow (PVF) >250 mL/min/100 g of liver were randomized into 2 groups: GIM and No GIM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>75 of 209 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria, and 38 underwent GIM. Baseline PVF and PVP were comparable between the GIM and no GIM groups. SAL significantly reduced the PVF and PVP ( P <0.001). There were no significant differences in the primary and secondary outcomes between the 2 groups. In the subgroup analysis, with a Graft to Recipient Weight Ratio ≤0.8, there were no significant differences in the primary and secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SAL significantly decreased PVP and PVF but did not decrease rates of EAD in adult LDLT.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"561-572"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Graft Inflow Modulation by Splenic Artery Ligation for Portal Hyperperfusion Does Not Decrease Rates of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Adult Live Donor Liver Transplantation: A Randomized Control Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Viniyendra Pamecha, Gattu Tharun, Nilesh Sadashiv Patil, Nihar Mohapatra, Anubhav Kumar, Shalini Thapar, Gaurav Sindwani, Udit Dhingra, Anil Yadav\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective was to compare the rates of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) in patients undergoing elective adult live donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) with and without graft portal inflow modulation (GIM) for portal hyperperfusion. The secondary objectives were to compare time to normalization of bilirubin and International Normalized Ratio, day 14 ascitic output more than 1 L, small-for-size syndrome, intensive care unit/high dependency unit and total hospital stay, and 90-day morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>GIM can prevent EAD in ALDLT patients with portal hyperperfusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center randomized trial with and without GIM for portal hyperperfusion by splenic artery ligation (SAL) in ALDLT was performed. After reperfusion, patients with portal venous pressure (PVP)>15 mm Hg with a gradient (PVP-central venous pressure) of ≥7 mm Hg and/or portal venous flow (PVF) >250 mL/min/100 g of liver were randomized into 2 groups: GIM and No GIM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>75 of 209 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria, and 38 underwent GIM. Baseline PVF and PVP were comparable between the GIM and no GIM groups. SAL significantly reduced the PVF and PVP ( P <0.001). There were no significant differences in the primary and secondary outcomes between the 2 groups. In the subgroup analysis, with a Graft to Recipient Weight Ratio ≤0.8, there were no significant differences in the primary and secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SAL significantly decreased PVP and PVF but did not decrease rates of EAD in adult LDLT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"561-572\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006369\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006369","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的主要目的是比较择期进行成人活体肝移植(ALDLT)的患者在使用和不使用移植物门静脉血流调节(GIM)治疗门静脉高灌注时的早期移植物功能障碍(EAD)发生率。次要目标是比较胆红素和国际标准化比值(INR)恢复正常的时间、第14天腹水排出量超过1升、小体型综合征(SFSS)、重症监护病房/高依赖病房和总住院时间以及90天发病率和死亡率:背景:GIM 可预防门静脉高灌注 ALDLT 患者的 EAD:方法:在单中心随机试验中,通过脾动脉结扎术(SAL)治疗 ALDLT 门静脉高灌注的患者使用或不使用 GIM。再灌注后,门静脉压(PVP)>15 毫米汞柱且梯度(PVP - 中心静脉压)≥ 7 毫米汞柱和/或门静脉流量(PVF)>250 毫升/分钟/100 克肝脏的患者被随机分为两组:结果:结果:209 例患者中有 75 例符合纳入标准,38 例接受了 GIM。GIM 组和非 GIM 组的基线 PVF 和 PVP 相当。SAL 能明显降低 PVF 和 PVP(结论:SAL 能明显降低 PVF 和 PVP:在成人 LDLT 中,SAL 能明显降低 PVP 和 PVF,但不能降低 EAD 的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Graft Inflow Modulation by Splenic Artery Ligation for Portal Hyperperfusion Does Not Decrease Rates of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Adult Live Donor Liver Transplantation: A Randomized Control Trial.

Objective: The primary objective was to compare the rates of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) in patients undergoing elective adult live donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) with and without graft portal inflow modulation (GIM) for portal hyperperfusion. The secondary objectives were to compare time to normalization of bilirubin and International Normalized Ratio, day 14 ascitic output more than 1 L, small-for-size syndrome, intensive care unit/high dependency unit and total hospital stay, and 90-day morbidity and mortality.

Background: GIM can prevent EAD in ALDLT patients with portal hyperperfusion.

Methods: A single-center randomized trial with and without GIM for portal hyperperfusion by splenic artery ligation (SAL) in ALDLT was performed. After reperfusion, patients with portal venous pressure (PVP)>15 mm Hg with a gradient (PVP-central venous pressure) of ≥7 mm Hg and/or portal venous flow (PVF) >250 mL/min/100 g of liver were randomized into 2 groups: GIM and No GIM.

Results: 75 of 209 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria, and 38 underwent GIM. Baseline PVF and PVP were comparable between the GIM and no GIM groups. SAL significantly reduced the PVF and PVP ( P <0.001). There were no significant differences in the primary and secondary outcomes between the 2 groups. In the subgroup analysis, with a Graft to Recipient Weight Ratio ≤0.8, there were no significant differences in the primary and secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: SAL significantly decreased PVP and PVF but did not decrease rates of EAD in adult LDLT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信