拨款和比较优势

IF 1.5 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Jiancai Pi, Shuxi Duan
{"title":"拨款和比较优势","authors":"Jiancai Pi, Shuxi Duan","doi":"10.1007/s10290-024-00542-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper analyzes how appropriation impacts comparative advantage through the general equilibrium approach. We find that appropriation can always reshape comparative advantage for both economies with strong and weak appropriation under different economic backgrounds. Specifically, whether the economy with stronger or weaker control on appropriation gains comparative advantage in the labor-intensive or capital-intensive product depends on the type of appropriation. More importantly, controlling on appropriation can make it feasible that a capital-intensive economy obtains comparative advantage in the labor-intensive product, which is against the prediction by the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem and may be helpful to explain the Leontief’s paradox. We also examine the welfare effect of controlling on appropriation and the relationship between appropriation and the optimal tariff.</p>","PeriodicalId":47405,"journal":{"name":"Review of World Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Appropriation and comparative advantage\",\"authors\":\"Jiancai Pi, Shuxi Duan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10290-024-00542-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper analyzes how appropriation impacts comparative advantage through the general equilibrium approach. We find that appropriation can always reshape comparative advantage for both economies with strong and weak appropriation under different economic backgrounds. Specifically, whether the economy with stronger or weaker control on appropriation gains comparative advantage in the labor-intensive or capital-intensive product depends on the type of appropriation. More importantly, controlling on appropriation can make it feasible that a capital-intensive economy obtains comparative advantage in the labor-intensive product, which is against the prediction by the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem and may be helpful to explain the Leontief’s paradox. We also examine the welfare effect of controlling on appropriation and the relationship between appropriation and the optimal tariff.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of World Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of World Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-024-00542-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of World Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-024-00542-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过一般均衡方法分析了拨款如何影响比较优势。我们发现,在不同的经济背景下,拨款对强拨款经济体和弱拨款经济体的比较优势总是可以重塑的。具体来说,对拨款控制较强或较弱的经济体是在劳动密集型产品还是资本密集型产品上获得比较优势,取决于拨款的类型。更重要的是,对拨款的控制可以使资本密集型经济在劳动密集型产品上获得比较优势成为可能,这与赫克歇尔-俄林定理的预测相反,可能有助于解释列昂惕夫悖论。我们还研究了控制拨款的福利效应以及拨款与最优关税之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Appropriation and comparative advantage

This paper analyzes how appropriation impacts comparative advantage through the general equilibrium approach. We find that appropriation can always reshape comparative advantage for both economies with strong and weak appropriation under different economic backgrounds. Specifically, whether the economy with stronger or weaker control on appropriation gains comparative advantage in the labor-intensive or capital-intensive product depends on the type of appropriation. More importantly, controlling on appropriation can make it feasible that a capital-intensive economy obtains comparative advantage in the labor-intensive product, which is against the prediction by the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem and may be helpful to explain the Leontief’s paradox. We also examine the welfare effect of controlling on appropriation and the relationship between appropriation and the optimal tariff.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Review of World Economics is a quarterly journal. Under the name Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, it was founded in 1913 as the world''s first journal with a focus on international economics. The Review has retained this focus, with particular emphasis on research in trade and trade policies, foreign direct investment, global supply chains, migration, international finance, currency systems and exchange rates, monetary and fiscal policies in open economies. The objective of the Review is to publish contributions of the highest quality and retain its status as one of the leading journals in international economics. Officially cited as: Rev World Econ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信