评估监控动物群监测计划是否适合用于检测爬行动物栖息地的未来变化

IF 1.6 3区 生物学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Wildlife Research Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1071/wr24008
Peter J. McDonald, Alistair Stewart, Simon J. Ward, Paul M. Oliver, Catherine E. M. Nano
{"title":"评估监控动物群监测计划是否适合用于检测爬行动物栖息地的未来变化","authors":"Peter J. McDonald, Alistair Stewart, Simon J. Ward, Paul M. Oliver, Catherine E. M. Nano","doi":"10.1071/wr24008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong> Context</strong><p>Ecological surveillance monitoring typically targets multiple taxonomic groups by using standardised sampling across large spatial scales. Although surveillance monitoring confers advantages over hypothesis-driven monitoring in its broad taxonomic and spatial scope, the approach has been criticised for its disconnect from ecological management and failure to provide insights on the drivers of ecological change</p><strong> Aims</strong><p>To assess the adequacy of a plot-based general fauna-monitoring program for sampling reptiles as indicators of ecosystem health in a semi-arid upland region of the Northern Territory, Australia.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>We surveyed reptiles at 90 sites, stratified between major landform and vegetation types, and using standard fauna-sampling methods, across the 2568 km<sup>2</sup> Tjoritja National Park in the MacDonnell Ranges. We compiled a full inventory of the reptile fauna of the study area and identified species with potential utility as ecological indicators. We then used single-season occupancy models and power analyses to evaluate the adequacy of sampling for detecting potential future changes in occupancy.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>We detected 57 of the 68 reptile species known from the protected area, 17 of which are potentially useful indicators of ecological health, mostly related to fire management. There was insufficient power to detect moderate (50%) future changes in reptile occupancy for all but the single most detected species. For the two ecological indicator species with sufficient detections for occupancy modelling, a positive association with a keystone structure (dense spinifex grass) was confirmed. However, increasing detection probability or the number of surveys would result in only minor improvements in power to detect occupancy change in these species.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>Although reptiles are potentially useful indicators of ecological health, particularly in relation to fire regimes, the number of sites required to detect future changes in reptile occupancy by using standardised plot-based monitoring in this protected area is prohibitively high.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>Our results suggest that once ecological associations are understood, monitoring ecological health remotely by using techniques such as fire-scar mapping to track proportions of long-unburnt vegetation should be considered over labour-intensive surveillance monitoring for reptiles. Targeted monitoring of threatened and other reptile species of conservation or cultural concern may also be warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":23971,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Research","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the suitability of a surveillance fauna-monitoring program for detecting future changes in reptile occupancy\",\"authors\":\"Peter J. McDonald, Alistair Stewart, Simon J. Ward, Paul M. Oliver, Catherine E. M. Nano\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/wr24008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong> Context</strong><p>Ecological surveillance monitoring typically targets multiple taxonomic groups by using standardised sampling across large spatial scales. Although surveillance monitoring confers advantages over hypothesis-driven monitoring in its broad taxonomic and spatial scope, the approach has been criticised for its disconnect from ecological management and failure to provide insights on the drivers of ecological change</p><strong> Aims</strong><p>To assess the adequacy of a plot-based general fauna-monitoring program for sampling reptiles as indicators of ecosystem health in a semi-arid upland region of the Northern Territory, Australia.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>We surveyed reptiles at 90 sites, stratified between major landform and vegetation types, and using standard fauna-sampling methods, across the 2568 km<sup>2</sup> Tjoritja National Park in the MacDonnell Ranges. We compiled a full inventory of the reptile fauna of the study area and identified species with potential utility as ecological indicators. We then used single-season occupancy models and power analyses to evaluate the adequacy of sampling for detecting potential future changes in occupancy.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>We detected 57 of the 68 reptile species known from the protected area, 17 of which are potentially useful indicators of ecological health, mostly related to fire management. There was insufficient power to detect moderate (50%) future changes in reptile occupancy for all but the single most detected species. For the two ecological indicator species with sufficient detections for occupancy modelling, a positive association with a keystone structure (dense spinifex grass) was confirmed. However, increasing detection probability or the number of surveys would result in only minor improvements in power to detect occupancy change in these species.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>Although reptiles are potentially useful indicators of ecological health, particularly in relation to fire regimes, the number of sites required to detect future changes in reptile occupancy by using standardised plot-based monitoring in this protected area is prohibitively high.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>Our results suggest that once ecological associations are understood, monitoring ecological health remotely by using techniques such as fire-scar mapping to track proportions of long-unburnt vegetation should be considered over labour-intensive surveillance monitoring for reptiles. Targeted monitoring of threatened and other reptile species of conservation or cultural concern may also be warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wildlife Research\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wildlife Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/wr24008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/wr24008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景生态监视监测通常通过在大空间尺度上使用标准化取样,以多个分类群组为目标。尽管与假设驱动型监测相比,监测型监测具有分类和空间范围广的优势,但这种方法也因与生态管理脱节以及无法深入了解生态变化的驱动因素而受到批评。 目的 评估澳大利亚北部半干旱高地地区以小区为基础的一般动物监测计划是否足以对作为生态系统健康指标的爬行动物进行采样。方法我们在麦克唐奈尔山脉面积为 2568 平方公里的特约里特贾国家公园的 90 个地点调查了爬行动物,这些地点按主要地貌和植被类型进行了分层,并采用了标准的动物采样方法。我们编制了一份研究区爬行动物的完整清单,并确定了具有潜在生态指标作用的物种。然后,我们使用单季栖息地模型和功率分析来评估取样是否足以检测未来栖息地的潜在变化。主要结果在保护区已知的 68 种爬行动物中,我们发现了 57 种,其中 17 种可能是有用的生态健康指标,主要与火灾管理有关。除了发现最多的一种爬行动物外,其他所有爬行动物的栖息地都没有足够的能力检测到未来的适度变化(50%)。对于两个检测到足够数量的生态指标物种来说,它们与关键结构(茂密的纤毛草)之间的正相关关系得到了证实。然而,提高探测概率或增加调查次数只能略微提高探测这些物种栖息地变化的能力。结论虽然爬行动物是生态健康状况的潜在有用指标,尤其是与火灾制度有关的指标,但在该保护区内使用标准化小区监测来检测爬行动物栖息地未来的变化所需的站点数量过高。启示我们的研究结果表明,一旦了解了生态关联,就应该考虑使用火痕绘图等技术远程监测生态健康状况,以跟踪长期未被烧毁的植被比例,而不是进行劳动密集型的爬行动物监视监测。此外,可能还需要对受威胁的爬行动物物种和其他受保护或文化关注的爬行动物物种进行有针对性的监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the suitability of a surveillance fauna-monitoring program for detecting future changes in reptile occupancy
Context

Ecological surveillance monitoring typically targets multiple taxonomic groups by using standardised sampling across large spatial scales. Although surveillance monitoring confers advantages over hypothesis-driven monitoring in its broad taxonomic and spatial scope, the approach has been criticised for its disconnect from ecological management and failure to provide insights on the drivers of ecological change

Aims

To assess the adequacy of a plot-based general fauna-monitoring program for sampling reptiles as indicators of ecosystem health in a semi-arid upland region of the Northern Territory, Australia.

Methods

We surveyed reptiles at 90 sites, stratified between major landform and vegetation types, and using standard fauna-sampling methods, across the 2568 km2 Tjoritja National Park in the MacDonnell Ranges. We compiled a full inventory of the reptile fauna of the study area and identified species with potential utility as ecological indicators. We then used single-season occupancy models and power analyses to evaluate the adequacy of sampling for detecting potential future changes in occupancy.

Key results

We detected 57 of the 68 reptile species known from the protected area, 17 of which are potentially useful indicators of ecological health, mostly related to fire management. There was insufficient power to detect moderate (50%) future changes in reptile occupancy for all but the single most detected species. For the two ecological indicator species with sufficient detections for occupancy modelling, a positive association with a keystone structure (dense spinifex grass) was confirmed. However, increasing detection probability or the number of surveys would result in only minor improvements in power to detect occupancy change in these species.

Conclusions

Although reptiles are potentially useful indicators of ecological health, particularly in relation to fire regimes, the number of sites required to detect future changes in reptile occupancy by using standardised plot-based monitoring in this protected area is prohibitively high.

Implications

Our results suggest that once ecological associations are understood, monitoring ecological health remotely by using techniques such as fire-scar mapping to track proportions of long-unburnt vegetation should be considered over labour-intensive surveillance monitoring for reptiles. Targeted monitoring of threatened and other reptile species of conservation or cultural concern may also be warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wildlife Research
Wildlife Research 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.80%
发文量
56
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Wildlife Research represents an international forum for the publication of research and debate on the ecology, management and conservation of wild animals in natural and modified habitats. The journal combines basic research in wildlife ecology with advances in science-based management practice. Subject areas include: applied ecology; conservation biology; ecosystem management; management of over-abundant, pest and invasive species; global change and wildlife management; diseases and their impacts on wildlife populations; human dimensions of management and conservation; assessing management outcomes; and the implications of wildlife research for policy development. Readers can expect a range of papers covering well-structured field studies, manipulative experiments, and analytical and modelling studies. All articles aim to improve the practice of wildlife management and contribute conceptual advances to our knowledge and understanding of wildlife ecology. Wildlife Research is a vital resource for wildlife scientists, students and managers, applied ecologists, conservation biologists, environmental consultants and NGOs and government policy advisors. Wildlife Research is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信