对抗式审判中检察官角色的动态理论

IF 0.6 3区社会学 Q2 LAW

Asian Journal of Law and Society Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1017/als.2024.12

Arushi Garg

{"title":"对抗式审判中检察官角色的动态理论","authors":"Arushi Garg","doi":"10.1017/als.2024.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Prosecutors in adversarial systems are simultaneously expected to be impartial ministers of justice and partisan advocates. Leaving this tension unaddressed can result in poor-quality prosecutorial decision-making. This article develops a novel “dynamic” framework for prosecutors to navigate between and prioritize these competing considerations, which can be used to understand, evaluate, and improve prosecutorial performance. Under this framework, the prioritization should depend on which function the prosecutor is exercising at any given time. The article then deploys primary data collected in Delhi, through court observation and interviews with judges, lawyers, victims, and victim-support persons, to exemplify and justify the framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":54015,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Dynamic Theory of Prosecutorial Roles in Adversarial Trials\",\"authors\":\"Arushi Garg\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/als.2024.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Prosecutors in adversarial systems are simultaneously expected to be impartial ministers of justice and partisan advocates. Leaving this tension unaddressed can result in poor-quality prosecutorial decision-making. This article develops a novel “dynamic” framework for prosecutors to navigate between and prioritize these competing considerations, which can be used to understand, evaluate, and improve prosecutorial performance. Under this framework, the prioritization should depend on which function the prosecutor is exercising at any given time. The article then deploys primary data collected in Delhi, through court observation and interviews with judges, lawyers, victims, and victim-support persons, to exemplify and justify the framework.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Law and Society\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Law and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2024.12\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2024.12","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

人们同时期望对抗制下的检察官成为公正的司法部长和党派代言人。如果不解决这一矛盾，就可能导致检察官决策质量低下。本文提出了一个新颖的 "动态 "框架，供检察官在这些相互竞争的考虑因素之间进行权衡和优先排序，并可用于理解、评估和改进检察官的绩效。在此框架下，优先顺序的确定应取决于检察官在任何特定时间行使的职能。文章随后利用在德里通过法庭观察和与法官、律师、受害者和受害者支持者的访谈收集到的原始数据，对该框架进行了举例说明和论证。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A Dynamic Theory of Prosecutorial Roles in Adversarial Trials

Prosecutors in adversarial systems are simultaneously expected to be impartial ministers of justice and partisan advocates. Leaving this tension unaddressed can result in poor-quality prosecutorial decision-making. This article develops a novel “dynamic” framework for prosecutors to navigate between and prioritize these competing considerations, which can be used to understand, evaluate, and improve prosecutorial performance. Under this framework, the prioritization should depend on which function the prosecutor is exercising at any given time. The article then deploys primary data collected in Delhi, through court observation and interviews with judges, lawyers, victims, and victim-support persons, to exemplify and justify the framework.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Asian Journal of Law and Society LAW-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Asian Journal of Law and Society (AJLS) adds an increasingly important Asian perspective to global law and society scholarship. This independent, peer-reviewed publication encourages empirical and multi-disciplinary research and welcomes articles on law and its relationship with society in Asia, articles bringing an Asian perspective to socio-legal issues of global concern, and articles using Asia as a starting point for a comparative exploration of law and society topics. Its coverage of Asia is broad and stretches from East Asia, South Asia and South East Asia to Central Asia. A unique combination of a base in Asia and an international editorial team creates a forum for Asian and Western scholars to exchange ideas of interest to Asian scholars and professionals, those working in or on Asia, as well as all working on law and society issues globally.