Z-cloud 基于粗糙模糊的 PIPRECIA 和 CoCoSo 集成来评估农业决策支持工具

IF 3.6 3区 计算机科学 Q2 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Alhamzah Alnoor, Yousif Raad Muhsen, Nor Azura Husin, XinYing Chew, Maslina Binti Zolkepli, Noridayu Manshor
{"title":"Z-cloud 基于粗糙模糊的 PIPRECIA 和 CoCoSo 集成来评估农业决策支持工具","authors":"Alhamzah Alnoor, Yousif Raad Muhsen, Nor Azura Husin, XinYing Chew, Maslina Binti Zolkepli, Noridayu Manshor","doi":"10.1007/s40815-024-01771-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The livestock sector has exacerbated the problems of ensuring global food safety and greenhouse gas emissions. The rapid increase in livestock production has called to shed light on decision-support tools that develop sustainable production strategies. In this context, this study aims to expand the application of multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDM) methods to assign weights to criteria and classify decision support tools for livestock with a high degree of certainty. In order to begin serious steps to address the global sustainability problem, this study extended the PIPRECIA method with a high-certainty fuzzy environment called Z-cloud rough numbers (ZCRNs) to record the weight of 19 criteria for decision support tools in livestock farming. An innovative and advanced method called CoCoSo has been utilized to rank decision-support tools for livestock farming. The methodology included two stages. The first phase involved developing the decision matrix. The second phase encompassed developing MCDM methods by clarifying the steps of the PIvot Pairwise RElative Criteria Importance Assessment (PIPRECIA) method for assigning weight to criteria, in addition to highlighting the steps of the CoCoSo method for classifying decision support tools in the livestock industry. The results of the PIPRECIA method extended to the fuzzy environment of ZCRNs confirmed that visualization and herd characteristics received the highest weight compared to the rest of the criteria of decision support tools. The CoCoSo results provided insight into ranking alternatives for livestock decision support tools. AgRECalc has the highest ranking, and FCFC has the lowest ranking. This study conducted an evaluation test to increase the chances of generalizing the results of ranking decision-support tools of the livestock industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":14056,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fuzzy Systems","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Z-cloud Rough Fuzzy-Based PIPRECIA and CoCoSo Integration to Assess Agriculture Decision Support Tools\",\"authors\":\"Alhamzah Alnoor, Yousif Raad Muhsen, Nor Azura Husin, XinYing Chew, Maslina Binti Zolkepli, Noridayu Manshor\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40815-024-01771-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The livestock sector has exacerbated the problems of ensuring global food safety and greenhouse gas emissions. The rapid increase in livestock production has called to shed light on decision-support tools that develop sustainable production strategies. In this context, this study aims to expand the application of multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDM) methods to assign weights to criteria and classify decision support tools for livestock with a high degree of certainty. In order to begin serious steps to address the global sustainability problem, this study extended the PIPRECIA method with a high-certainty fuzzy environment called Z-cloud rough numbers (ZCRNs) to record the weight of 19 criteria for decision support tools in livestock farming. An innovative and advanced method called CoCoSo has been utilized to rank decision-support tools for livestock farming. The methodology included two stages. The first phase involved developing the decision matrix. The second phase encompassed developing MCDM methods by clarifying the steps of the PIvot Pairwise RElative Criteria Importance Assessment (PIPRECIA) method for assigning weight to criteria, in addition to highlighting the steps of the CoCoSo method for classifying decision support tools in the livestock industry. The results of the PIPRECIA method extended to the fuzzy environment of ZCRNs confirmed that visualization and herd characteristics received the highest weight compared to the rest of the criteria of decision support tools. The CoCoSo results provided insight into ranking alternatives for livestock decision support tools. AgRECalc has the highest ranking, and FCFC has the lowest ranking. This study conducted an evaluation test to increase the chances of generalizing the results of ranking decision-support tools of the livestock industry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Fuzzy Systems\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Fuzzy Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-024-01771-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fuzzy Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-024-01771-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

畜牧业加剧了确保全球食品安全和温室气体排放的问题。畜牧业生产的快速增长要求人们了解制定可持续生产战略的决策支持工具。在此背景下,本研究旨在扩大多重标准决策分析(MCDM)方法的应用范围,为标准分配权重,并对畜牧业决策支持工具进行高度确定性分类。为了着手认真解决全球可持续发展问题,本研究将 PIPRECIA 方法扩展到高确定性模糊环境(称为 Z 云粗糙数 (ZCRN)),以记录畜牧业决策支持工具中 19 个标准的权重。研究采用了一种名为 CoCoSo 的创新先进方法对畜牧业决策支持工具进行排序。该方法包括两个阶段。第一阶段是开发决策矩阵。第二阶段包括开发 MCDM 方法,除了强调 CoCoSo 方法对畜牧业决策支持工具进行排序的步骤外,还阐明了 PIvot Pairwise RElative Criteria Importance Assessment (PIPRECIA) 方法为标准分配权重的步骤。将 PIPRECIA 方法扩展到 ZCRN 的模糊环境的结果证实,与决策支持工具的其他标准相比,可视化和牛群特征的权重最高。CoCoSo 的结果为畜牧业决策支持工具的排序提供了启示。AgRECalc 的排名最高,而 FCFC 的排名最低。本研究进行了一项评估测试,以提高畜牧业决策支持工具排名结果的通用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Z-cloud Rough Fuzzy-Based PIPRECIA and CoCoSo Integration to Assess Agriculture Decision Support Tools

Z-cloud Rough Fuzzy-Based PIPRECIA and CoCoSo Integration to Assess Agriculture Decision Support Tools

The livestock sector has exacerbated the problems of ensuring global food safety and greenhouse gas emissions. The rapid increase in livestock production has called to shed light on decision-support tools that develop sustainable production strategies. In this context, this study aims to expand the application of multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDM) methods to assign weights to criteria and classify decision support tools for livestock with a high degree of certainty. In order to begin serious steps to address the global sustainability problem, this study extended the PIPRECIA method with a high-certainty fuzzy environment called Z-cloud rough numbers (ZCRNs) to record the weight of 19 criteria for decision support tools in livestock farming. An innovative and advanced method called CoCoSo has been utilized to rank decision-support tools for livestock farming. The methodology included two stages. The first phase involved developing the decision matrix. The second phase encompassed developing MCDM methods by clarifying the steps of the PIvot Pairwise RElative Criteria Importance Assessment (PIPRECIA) method for assigning weight to criteria, in addition to highlighting the steps of the CoCoSo method for classifying decision support tools in the livestock industry. The results of the PIPRECIA method extended to the fuzzy environment of ZCRNs confirmed that visualization and herd characteristics received the highest weight compared to the rest of the criteria of decision support tools. The CoCoSo results provided insight into ranking alternatives for livestock decision support tools. AgRECalc has the highest ranking, and FCFC has the lowest ranking. This study conducted an evaluation test to increase the chances of generalizing the results of ranking decision-support tools of the livestock industry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.30%
发文量
188
审稿时长
16 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Fuzzy Systems (IJFS) is an official journal of Taiwan Fuzzy Systems Association (TFSA) and is published semi-quarterly. IJFS will consider high quality papers that deal with the theory, design, and application of fuzzy systems, soft computing systems, grey systems, and extension theory systems ranging from hardware to software. Survey and expository submissions are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信