在发生故意或意外用药过量事件后,实施和评估专业间用药过量审查小组的建议。

The mental health clinician Pub Date : 2024-06-03 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.9740/mhc.2024.06.224
Monica Barrett, Sarah Kemerer, Michelle Colvard
{"title":"在发生故意或意外用药过量事件后,实施和评估专业间用药过量审查小组的建议。","authors":"Monica Barrett, Sarah Kemerer, Michelle Colvard","doi":"10.9740/mhc.2024.06.224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drug overdose death rates in the United States remain high despite efforts to mitigate this risk. Many communities and hospitals across the country have implemented overdose review teams, including local overdose fatality review teams or postoverdose intervention programs, to address the opioid crisis. The goal of most of these teams is to identify missed opportunities or patient-specific interventions to prevent future opioid overdose fatalities. Few overdose review teams review a combination of both fatal and nonfatal overdose events. The Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System implemented a novel overdose review team (ORT) that collaboratively reviews all overdose incidents regardless of fatality, intent, or substance involved. This practice description characterizes reported facility overdose events and patient-specific risk-mitigation strategies recommended by the ORT, highlights the implementation rate and time to implementation of ORT recommendations, and discusses potential areas for process improvement. This practice highlights the potential impact of a pharmacist-led, interdisciplinary ORT following accidental or intentional overdose events involving any substance or medication. Key patient-specific interventions implemented following ORT recommendations included overdose prevention education and naloxone distribution, prescribing of medications for opioid use disorder and/or alcohol use disorder, reducing medication supply to limit lethal means access, and facilitation of mental health and/or substance use disorder specialty appointments. Further research to evaluate clinical outcomes related to specific ORT interventions should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":101313,"journal":{"name":"The mental health clinician","volume":"14 3","pages":"224-228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11147656/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation and evaluation of interprofessional overdose review team recommendations following intentional or accidental overdose events.\",\"authors\":\"Monica Barrett, Sarah Kemerer, Michelle Colvard\",\"doi\":\"10.9740/mhc.2024.06.224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Drug overdose death rates in the United States remain high despite efforts to mitigate this risk. Many communities and hospitals across the country have implemented overdose review teams, including local overdose fatality review teams or postoverdose intervention programs, to address the opioid crisis. The goal of most of these teams is to identify missed opportunities or patient-specific interventions to prevent future opioid overdose fatalities. Few overdose review teams review a combination of both fatal and nonfatal overdose events. The Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System implemented a novel overdose review team (ORT) that collaboratively reviews all overdose incidents regardless of fatality, intent, or substance involved. This practice description characterizes reported facility overdose events and patient-specific risk-mitigation strategies recommended by the ORT, highlights the implementation rate and time to implementation of ORT recommendations, and discusses potential areas for process improvement. This practice highlights the potential impact of a pharmacist-led, interdisciplinary ORT following accidental or intentional overdose events involving any substance or medication. Key patient-specific interventions implemented following ORT recommendations included overdose prevention education and naloxone distribution, prescribing of medications for opioid use disorder and/or alcohol use disorder, reducing medication supply to limit lethal means access, and facilitation of mental health and/or substance use disorder specialty appointments. Further research to evaluate clinical outcomes related to specific ORT interventions should be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The mental health clinician\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"224-228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11147656/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The mental health clinician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2024.06.224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The mental health clinician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2024.06.224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管美国努力降低吸毒过量风险,但吸毒过量死亡率仍然居高不下。为应对阿片类药物危机,美国许多社区和医院都成立了用药过量审查小组,包括地方用药过量死亡审查小组或用药过量后干预计划。大多数此类团队的目标是找出错失的机会或针对患者的干预措施,以防止今后发生阿片类药物过量致死事件。很少有用药过量审查小组同时审查致命和非致命用药过量事件。退伍军人事务田纳西河谷医疗保健系统实施了一个新颖的用药过量审查团队 (ORT),该团队合作审查所有用药过量事件,无论是否致死、意图如何或涉及何种物质。本实践描述描述了所报告的设施用药过量事件的特征以及 ORT 建议的针对特定患者的风险缓解策略,强调了 ORT 建议的实施率和实施时间,并讨论了流程改进的潜在领域。本实践强调了在发生涉及任何物质或药物的意外或故意用药过量事件后,由药剂师领导的跨学科 ORT 的潜在影响。根据 ORT 建议实施的针对特定患者的关键干预措施包括:过量预防教育和纳洛酮分发、开具治疗阿片类药物使用障碍和/或酒精使用障碍的处方、减少药物供应以限制致命手段的获取,以及为精神健康和/或药物使用障碍专科预约提供便利。应考虑开展进一步研究,评估与特定 ORT 干预措施相关的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation and evaluation of interprofessional overdose review team recommendations following intentional or accidental overdose events.

Drug overdose death rates in the United States remain high despite efforts to mitigate this risk. Many communities and hospitals across the country have implemented overdose review teams, including local overdose fatality review teams or postoverdose intervention programs, to address the opioid crisis. The goal of most of these teams is to identify missed opportunities or patient-specific interventions to prevent future opioid overdose fatalities. Few overdose review teams review a combination of both fatal and nonfatal overdose events. The Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System implemented a novel overdose review team (ORT) that collaboratively reviews all overdose incidents regardless of fatality, intent, or substance involved. This practice description characterizes reported facility overdose events and patient-specific risk-mitigation strategies recommended by the ORT, highlights the implementation rate and time to implementation of ORT recommendations, and discusses potential areas for process improvement. This practice highlights the potential impact of a pharmacist-led, interdisciplinary ORT following accidental or intentional overdose events involving any substance or medication. Key patient-specific interventions implemented following ORT recommendations included overdose prevention education and naloxone distribution, prescribing of medications for opioid use disorder and/or alcohol use disorder, reducing medication supply to limit lethal means access, and facilitation of mental health and/or substance use disorder specialty appointments. Further research to evaluate clinical outcomes related to specific ORT interventions should be considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信