评估灾难性洪灾后减少灾害风险的神话

Daniel Nohrstedt, Elena Mondino, Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Charles F. Parker
{"title":"评估灾难性洪灾后减少灾害风险的神话","authors":"Daniel Nohrstedt, Elena Mondino, Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Charles F. Parker","doi":"10.1038/s44304-024-00007-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whether disasters serve as focusing events leading to measures that reduce future disaster risks is contested. Here, we study flood disasters in 23 of the world’s most flood-prone countries to assess whether catastrophic floods, those milestone events with the highest fatalities, have been followed by decreasing mortality in subsequent floods. Results from a trend analysis, controlling for flood magnitude and subtypes, find that reductions in mortality rates have rarely followed the most devastating floods.","PeriodicalId":501712,"journal":{"name":"npj Natural Hazards","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44304-024-00007-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the myth of disaster risk reduction in the wake of catastrophic floods\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Nohrstedt, Elena Mondino, Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Charles F. Parker\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s44304-024-00007-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Whether disasters serve as focusing events leading to measures that reduce future disaster risks is contested. Here, we study flood disasters in 23 of the world’s most flood-prone countries to assess whether catastrophic floods, those milestone events with the highest fatalities, have been followed by decreasing mortality in subsequent floods. Results from a trend analysis, controlling for flood magnitude and subtypes, find that reductions in mortality rates have rarely followed the most devastating floods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501712,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"npj Natural Hazards\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44304-024-00007-w.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"npj Natural Hazards\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44304-024-00007-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Natural Hazards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44304-024-00007-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

灾害是否会成为导致采取措施降低未来灾害风险的焦点事件,这一点还存在争议。在此,我们研究了世界上最容易发生洪灾的 23 个国家的洪灾情况,以评估灾难性洪灾(即死亡率最高的里程碑事件)是否会导致后续洪灾的死亡率下降。趋势分析结果表明,在控制洪水规模和子类的情况下,死亡率的降低很少发生在最具破坏性的洪水之后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing the myth of disaster risk reduction in the wake of catastrophic floods

Assessing the myth of disaster risk reduction in the wake of catastrophic floods
Whether disasters serve as focusing events leading to measures that reduce future disaster risks is contested. Here, we study flood disasters in 23 of the world’s most flood-prone countries to assess whether catastrophic floods, those milestone events with the highest fatalities, have been followed by decreasing mortality in subsequent floods. Results from a trend analysis, controlling for flood magnitude and subtypes, find that reductions in mortality rates have rarely followed the most devastating floods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信