大盆地灌木丛管理简史:从清除到减少及其后

Tyler Harris , Dustin D. Johnson , Rory C. O'Connor
{"title":"大盆地灌木丛管理简史:从清除到减少及其后","authors":"Tyler Harris ,&nbsp;Dustin D. Johnson ,&nbsp;Rory C. O'Connor","doi":"10.1016/j.rala.2024.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p></p><ul><li><span>•</span><span><p>After years of overgrazing in the late 1800s and early 1900s with little to no management, range management efforts shifted to focus on eradication of sagebrush to promote forage production from World War II to the 1970s.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>From the 1970s to present the paradigm shifted to an emphasis on leaving sagebrush intact for the benefit of sagebrush-obligate wildlife.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>However, neither management paradigm has yielded an ideal outcome with approximately 30% of the Great Basin being identified as “poor condition shrubland,” with &gt;10% shrub cover and a high ratio of annual to perennial herbaceous cover.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>A combination of new and old restoration methods is needed to restore degraded sagebrush communities to rejuvenate the declining perennial herbaceous understories and increase biotic resiliency of the shrub community.</p></span></li></ul></div>","PeriodicalId":101057,"journal":{"name":"Rangelands","volume":"46 3","pages":"Pages 63-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190052824000087/pdfft?md5=a84d5b80ab932d6d01699c79ccb1fe16&pid=1-s2.0-S0190052824000087-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A brief history of sagebrush management in the Great Basin: From removal to reduction and beyond\",\"authors\":\"Tyler Harris ,&nbsp;Dustin D. Johnson ,&nbsp;Rory C. O'Connor\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rala.2024.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p></p><ul><li><span>•</span><span><p>After years of overgrazing in the late 1800s and early 1900s with little to no management, range management efforts shifted to focus on eradication of sagebrush to promote forage production from World War II to the 1970s.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>From the 1970s to present the paradigm shifted to an emphasis on leaving sagebrush intact for the benefit of sagebrush-obligate wildlife.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>However, neither management paradigm has yielded an ideal outcome with approximately 30% of the Great Basin being identified as “poor condition shrubland,” with &gt;10% shrub cover and a high ratio of annual to perennial herbaceous cover.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>A combination of new and old restoration methods is needed to restore degraded sagebrush communities to rejuvenate the declining perennial herbaceous understories and increase biotic resiliency of the shrub community.</p></span></li></ul></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rangelands\",\"volume\":\"46 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 63-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190052824000087/pdfft?md5=a84d5b80ab932d6d01699c79ccb1fe16&pid=1-s2.0-S0190052824000087-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rangelands\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190052824000087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangelands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190052824000087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

-在 19 世纪末和 20 世纪初的多年过度放牧之后,牧场管理几乎没有进行任何管理,从第二次世界大战到 20 世纪 70 年代,牧场管理的重点转向根除灌木丛,以促进饲料生产。-然而,这两种管理模式都没有产生理想的结果,大盆地约有 30% 的地区被认定为 "灌木地状况不佳",灌木覆盖率为 10%,一年生草本植物与多年生草本植物的覆盖率很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A brief history of sagebrush management in the Great Basin: From removal to reduction and beyond

  • After years of overgrazing in the late 1800s and early 1900s with little to no management, range management efforts shifted to focus on eradication of sagebrush to promote forage production from World War II to the 1970s.

  • From the 1970s to present the paradigm shifted to an emphasis on leaving sagebrush intact for the benefit of sagebrush-obligate wildlife.

  • However, neither management paradigm has yielded an ideal outcome with approximately 30% of the Great Basin being identified as “poor condition shrubland,” with >10% shrub cover and a high ratio of annual to perennial herbaceous cover.

  • A combination of new and old restoration methods is needed to restore degraded sagebrush communities to rejuvenate the declining perennial herbaceous understories and increase biotic resiliency of the shrub community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信