在中华人民共和国,抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白1/程序性死亡配体1抗体联合化疗作为NSCLC一线治疗的有效性和安全性:系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Qi-An Chen M.B.B.S. , Kai Ma MD, PhD , Lin Zhang PhD , Wei-Hao Lin M.B.B.S. , Xian-Xian Wu PhD , Yi-Bo Gao MD, PhD
{"title":"在中华人民共和国,抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白1/程序性死亡配体1抗体联合化疗作为NSCLC一线治疗的有效性和安全性:系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Qi-An Chen M.B.B.S. ,&nbsp;Kai Ma MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Lin Zhang PhD ,&nbsp;Wei-Hao Lin M.B.B.S. ,&nbsp;Xian-Xian Wu PhD ,&nbsp;Yi-Bo Gao MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The available approved anticancer drugs for Chinese patients are relatively limited because of China's low participation rate in international clinical trials. Therefore, a focus on approved anti–programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) drugs in China is needed. This study aims to assess the heterogeneity of anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies manufactured in China (domestic PD-1/PD-L1) and overseas (imported PD-1/PD-L1) when combined with chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of NSCLC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library of publications up to July 13, 2023. Meta-analysis was applied to compare the efficacy and safety profile between anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies plus chemotherapy (PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo) and chemotherapy alone using STATA software. Pooled hazard ratios for progression-free survival and overall survival, odds ratios for objective response rate, and incidence rate of grade greater than or equal to three treatment-related adverse events with 95% confidence intervals were calculated in the domestic group and imported group by a random-effects model, and the heterogeneity between the two estimates was assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 14 eligible clinical studies with a total of 3951 patients involved in this analysis, including eight studies of domestic PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo and six studies of imported PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo. The study revealed that there was no significant difference between domestic and imported PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo in overall survival (<em>p</em> = 0.80), progression-free survival (<em>p</em> = 0.53), and incidence rate of grade greater than or equal to three treatment-related adverse events (<em>p</em> = 0.10). Nevertheless, the objective response rate of imported PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo was significantly higher than that of domestic PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo (<em>p</em> = 0.03).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Domestic anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies plus chemotherapy were found to have comparable efficacy and safety to those combined with imported anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies based on current evidence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":"5 6","pages":"Article 100678"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364324000481/pdfft?md5=08d01b2e228c748735ce6ddd0baee1fc&pid=1-s2.0-S2666364324000481-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Anti–Programmed Cell Death Protein 1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Antibodies Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for NSCLC in the People’s Republic of China: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Qi-An Chen M.B.B.S. ,&nbsp;Kai Ma MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Lin Zhang PhD ,&nbsp;Wei-Hao Lin M.B.B.S. ,&nbsp;Xian-Xian Wu PhD ,&nbsp;Yi-Bo Gao MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The available approved anticancer drugs for Chinese patients are relatively limited because of China's low participation rate in international clinical trials. Therefore, a focus on approved anti–programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) drugs in China is needed. This study aims to assess the heterogeneity of anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies manufactured in China (domestic PD-1/PD-L1) and overseas (imported PD-1/PD-L1) when combined with chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of NSCLC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library of publications up to July 13, 2023. Meta-analysis was applied to compare the efficacy and safety profile between anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies plus chemotherapy (PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo) and chemotherapy alone using STATA software. Pooled hazard ratios for progression-free survival and overall survival, odds ratios for objective response rate, and incidence rate of grade greater than or equal to three treatment-related adverse events with 95% confidence intervals were calculated in the domestic group and imported group by a random-effects model, and the heterogeneity between the two estimates was assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 14 eligible clinical studies with a total of 3951 patients involved in this analysis, including eight studies of domestic PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo and six studies of imported PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo. The study revealed that there was no significant difference between domestic and imported PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo in overall survival (<em>p</em> = 0.80), progression-free survival (<em>p</em> = 0.53), and incidence rate of grade greater than or equal to three treatment-related adverse events (<em>p</em> = 0.10). Nevertheless, the objective response rate of imported PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo was significantly higher than that of domestic PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo (<em>p</em> = 0.03).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Domestic anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies plus chemotherapy were found to have comparable efficacy and safety to those combined with imported anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies based on current evidence.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JTO Clinical and Research Reports\",\"volume\":\"5 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 100678\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364324000481/pdfft?md5=08d01b2e228c748735ce6ddd0baee1fc&pid=1-s2.0-S2666364324000481-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JTO Clinical and Research Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364324000481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364324000481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:由于中国参与国际临床试验的比例较低,可供中国患者使用的获批抗癌药物相对有限。因此,需要关注中国已批准的抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD-1)/程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)药物。本研究旨在评估中国生产的抗PD-1/PD-L1抗体(国产PD-1/PD-L1)和国外生产的抗PD-1/PD-L1抗体(进口PD-1/PD-L1)在联合化疗作为NSCLC一线治疗时的异质性。方法使用PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆截至2023年7月13日的出版物进行系统检索。采用STATA软件进行Meta分析,比较抗PD-1/PD-L1抗体加化疗(PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo)和单纯化疗的疗效和安全性。通过随机效应模型计算了国产组和进口组的无进展生存期和总生存期的汇总危险比、客观反应率的几率、大于或等于3级的治疗相关不良事件发生率及95%置信区间,并评估了两者估计值之间的异质性。结果本分析共有14项符合条件的临床研究,共3951例患者参与,其中包括8项国产PD-1/PD-L1+化疗研究和6项进口PD-1/PD-L1+化疗研究。研究显示,国产与进口PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo在总生存期(P=0.80)、无进展生存期(P=0.53)和大于或等于3级的治疗相关不良事件发生率(P=0.10)方面无显著差异。尽管如此,进口PD-1/PD-L1+化疗的客观反应率明显高于国产PD-1/PD-L1+化疗(p = 0.03)。结论根据目前的证据发现,国产抗PD-1/PD-L1抗体联合化疗与进口抗PD-1/PD-L1抗体联合化疗的疗效和安全性相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Anti–Programmed Cell Death Protein 1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Antibodies Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for NSCLC in the People’s Republic of China: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

The available approved anticancer drugs for Chinese patients are relatively limited because of China's low participation rate in international clinical trials. Therefore, a focus on approved anti–programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) drugs in China is needed. This study aims to assess the heterogeneity of anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies manufactured in China (domestic PD-1/PD-L1) and overseas (imported PD-1/PD-L1) when combined with chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of NSCLC.

Methods

A systematic search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library of publications up to July 13, 2023. Meta-analysis was applied to compare the efficacy and safety profile between anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies plus chemotherapy (PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo) and chemotherapy alone using STATA software. Pooled hazard ratios for progression-free survival and overall survival, odds ratios for objective response rate, and incidence rate of grade greater than or equal to three treatment-related adverse events with 95% confidence intervals were calculated in the domestic group and imported group by a random-effects model, and the heterogeneity between the two estimates was assessed.

Results

There were 14 eligible clinical studies with a total of 3951 patients involved in this analysis, including eight studies of domestic PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo and six studies of imported PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo. The study revealed that there was no significant difference between domestic and imported PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo in overall survival (p = 0.80), progression-free survival (p = 0.53), and incidence rate of grade greater than or equal to three treatment-related adverse events (p = 0.10). Nevertheless, the objective response rate of imported PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo was significantly higher than that of domestic PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo (p = 0.03).

Conclusions

Domestic anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies plus chemotherapy were found to have comparable efficacy and safety to those combined with imported anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies based on current evidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信