{"title":"使用智能手机应用软件对健康年轻人进行直腿抬高和髋关节伸展运动范围测试的可靠性","authors":"Tetsuya Amano , Nobuhide Agata , Takeshi Yamamoto , Keisuke Mori","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.05.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Measuring range of motion (ROM) is an important skill for clinicians because it can help in the accurate interpretation of a patient's condition. Recently, ROM tests using smartphone applications have been performed in clinical settings, with the tests demonstrating high reliability and validity. This study aimed to identify the usefulness of ROM tests conducted using smartphone applications by examining the reliability of straight leg raise (SLR) and hip extension (HE) tests.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional observational study included 72 lower limbs of 36 participants (19 men and 17 women; mean age, 21.6 ± 0.8 years). Passive SLR-ROM and HE-ROM were measured in 1° increments using an iPhone goniometer (IG). Intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities were calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). ROM test systematic error was confirmed using Bland–Altman analysis, and ROM measurement error was calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The ICCs of the IG ROM tests were 0.820 or higher. According to Bland–Altman analyses, SLR-ROM and HE-ROM did not acknowledge fixed and proportional biases. Thus, ROM measurement error was calculated as the minimal detectable change (MDC). The intra-rater and inter-rater MDC 95% confidence interval (MDC<sub>95</sub>) values of SLR-ROM were 3.3° and 10.2°, respectively. The intra-rater and inter-rater MDC<sub>95</sub> values for HE-ROM were 3.9° and 9.6°, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>IG ROM tests were highly reliable, simple, and easy to perform. SLR-ROM and HE-ROM tests conducted using smartphone applications may be useful indices for clinical decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"40 ","pages":"Pages 683-688"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of range of motion in straight leg raise and hip extension tests among healthy young adults using a smartphone application\",\"authors\":\"Tetsuya Amano , Nobuhide Agata , Takeshi Yamamoto , Keisuke Mori\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.05.033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Measuring range of motion (ROM) is an important skill for clinicians because it can help in the accurate interpretation of a patient's condition. Recently, ROM tests using smartphone applications have been performed in clinical settings, with the tests demonstrating high reliability and validity. This study aimed to identify the usefulness of ROM tests conducted using smartphone applications by examining the reliability of straight leg raise (SLR) and hip extension (HE) tests.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional observational study included 72 lower limbs of 36 participants (19 men and 17 women; mean age, 21.6 ± 0.8 years). Passive SLR-ROM and HE-ROM were measured in 1° increments using an iPhone goniometer (IG). Intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities were calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). ROM test systematic error was confirmed using Bland–Altman analysis, and ROM measurement error was calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The ICCs of the IG ROM tests were 0.820 or higher. According to Bland–Altman analyses, SLR-ROM and HE-ROM did not acknowledge fixed and proportional biases. Thus, ROM measurement error was calculated as the minimal detectable change (MDC). The intra-rater and inter-rater MDC 95% confidence interval (MDC<sub>95</sub>) values of SLR-ROM were 3.3° and 10.2°, respectively. The intra-rater and inter-rater MDC<sub>95</sub> values for HE-ROM were 3.9° and 9.6°, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>IG ROM tests were highly reliable, simple, and easy to perform. SLR-ROM and HE-ROM tests conducted using smartphone applications may be useful indices for clinical decision-making.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 683-688\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224003127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224003127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reliability of range of motion in straight leg raise and hip extension tests among healthy young adults using a smartphone application
Introduction
Measuring range of motion (ROM) is an important skill for clinicians because it can help in the accurate interpretation of a patient's condition. Recently, ROM tests using smartphone applications have been performed in clinical settings, with the tests demonstrating high reliability and validity. This study aimed to identify the usefulness of ROM tests conducted using smartphone applications by examining the reliability of straight leg raise (SLR) and hip extension (HE) tests.
Methods
This cross-sectional observational study included 72 lower limbs of 36 participants (19 men and 17 women; mean age, 21.6 ± 0.8 years). Passive SLR-ROM and HE-ROM were measured in 1° increments using an iPhone goniometer (IG). Intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities were calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). ROM test systematic error was confirmed using Bland–Altman analysis, and ROM measurement error was calculated.
Results
The ICCs of the IG ROM tests were 0.820 or higher. According to Bland–Altman analyses, SLR-ROM and HE-ROM did not acknowledge fixed and proportional biases. Thus, ROM measurement error was calculated as the minimal detectable change (MDC). The intra-rater and inter-rater MDC 95% confidence interval (MDC95) values of SLR-ROM were 3.3° and 10.2°, respectively. The intra-rater and inter-rater MDC95 values for HE-ROM were 3.9° and 9.6°, respectively.
Conclusion
IG ROM tests were highly reliable, simple, and easy to perform. SLR-ROM and HE-ROM tests conducted using smartphone applications may be useful indices for clinical decision-making.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina