Sarah L Thomas, Karen M Schmidt, Monica K Erbacher, Cindy S Bergeman
{"title":"你不知道的东西会伤害你:缺失数据和部分信贷模型估算。","authors":"Sarah L Thomas, Karen M Schmidt, Monica K Erbacher, Cindy S Bergeman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors investigated the effect of missing completely at random (MCAR) item responses on partial credit model (PCM) parameter estimates in a longitudinal study of Positive Affect. Participants were 307 adults from the older cohort of the Notre Dame Study of Health and Well-Being (Bergeman and Deboeck, 2014) who completed questionnaires including Positive Affect items for 56 days. Additional missing responses were introduced to the data, randomly replacing 20%, 50%, and 70% of the responses on each item and each day with missing values, in addition to the existing missing data. Results indicated that item locations and person trait level measures diverged from the original estimates as the level of degradation from induced missing data increased. In addition, standard errors of these estimates increased with the level of degradation. Thus, MCAR data does damage the quality and precision of PCM estimates. </p>","PeriodicalId":73608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied measurement","volume":"17 1","pages":"14-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5636626/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What You Don't Know Can Hurt You: Missing Data and Partial Credit Model Estimates.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah L Thomas, Karen M Schmidt, Monica K Erbacher, Cindy S Bergeman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The authors investigated the effect of missing completely at random (MCAR) item responses on partial credit model (PCM) parameter estimates in a longitudinal study of Positive Affect. Participants were 307 adults from the older cohort of the Notre Dame Study of Health and Well-Being (Bergeman and Deboeck, 2014) who completed questionnaires including Positive Affect items for 56 days. Additional missing responses were introduced to the data, randomly replacing 20%, 50%, and 70% of the responses on each item and each day with missing values, in addition to the existing missing data. Results indicated that item locations and person trait level measures diverged from the original estimates as the level of degradation from induced missing data increased. In addition, standard errors of these estimates increased with the level of degradation. Thus, MCAR data does damage the quality and precision of PCM estimates. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied measurement\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"14-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5636626/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
作者在一项关于积极情感的纵向研究中调查了完全随机缺失(MCAR)项目回答对部分信用模型(PCM)参数估计的影响。参与者是圣母大学健康与幸福研究(Notre Dame Study of Health and Well-Being,Bergeman 和 Deboeck,2014 年)老年队列中的 307 名成年人,他们在 56 天内完成了包括积极情感项目在内的问卷调查。除了现有的缺失数据外,我们还在数据中引入了额外的缺失应答,随机替换了每个项目和每天 20%、50% 和 70% 的应答缺失值。结果表明,随着诱导缺失数据退化程度的增加,项目位置和个人特质水平的测量结果与原始估计值出现了偏差。此外,这些估计值的标准误差也随着退化程度的增加而增加。因此,MCAR 数据确实会损害 PCM 估计值的质量和精度。
What You Don't Know Can Hurt You: Missing Data and Partial Credit Model Estimates.
The authors investigated the effect of missing completely at random (MCAR) item responses on partial credit model (PCM) parameter estimates in a longitudinal study of Positive Affect. Participants were 307 adults from the older cohort of the Notre Dame Study of Health and Well-Being (Bergeman and Deboeck, 2014) who completed questionnaires including Positive Affect items for 56 days. Additional missing responses were introduced to the data, randomly replacing 20%, 50%, and 70% of the responses on each item and each day with missing values, in addition to the existing missing data. Results indicated that item locations and person trait level measures diverged from the original estimates as the level of degradation from induced missing data increased. In addition, standard errors of these estimates increased with the level of degradation. Thus, MCAR data does damage the quality and precision of PCM estimates.