{"title":"神经重症监护检查和评估。","authors":"Sarah Wahlster, Nicholas J Johnson","doi":"10.1212/CON.0000000000001438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article provides an overview of the evaluation of patients in neurocritical care settings and a structured approach to recognizing and localizing acute neurologic emergencies, performing a focused examination, and pursuing workup to identify critical findings requiring urgent management.</p><p><strong>Latest developments: </strong>After identifying and stabilizing imminent threats to survival, including respiratory and hemodynamic compromise, the initial differential diagnosis for patients in neurocritical care is built on a focused history and clinical examination, always keeping in mind critical \"must-not-miss\" pathologies. A key priority is to identify processes warranting time-sensitive therapeutic interventions, including signs of elevated intracranial pressure and herniation, acute neurovascular emergencies, clinical or subclinical seizures, infections of the central nervous system, spinal cord compression, and acute neuromuscular respiratory failure. Prompt neuroimaging to identify structural abnormalities should be obtained, complemented by laboratory findings to assess for underlying systemic causes. The indication for EEG and lumbar puncture should be considered early based on clinical suspicion.</p><p><strong>Essential points: </strong>In neurocritical care, the initial evaluation is often fast paced, requiring assessment and management to happen in parallel. History, clinical examination, and workup should be obtained while considering therapeutic implications and the need for lifesaving interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":52475,"journal":{"name":"CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology","volume":"30 3","pages":"556-587"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Neurocritical Care Examination and Workup.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Wahlster, Nicholas J Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/CON.0000000000001438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article provides an overview of the evaluation of patients in neurocritical care settings and a structured approach to recognizing and localizing acute neurologic emergencies, performing a focused examination, and pursuing workup to identify critical findings requiring urgent management.</p><p><strong>Latest developments: </strong>After identifying and stabilizing imminent threats to survival, including respiratory and hemodynamic compromise, the initial differential diagnosis for patients in neurocritical care is built on a focused history and clinical examination, always keeping in mind critical \\\"must-not-miss\\\" pathologies. A key priority is to identify processes warranting time-sensitive therapeutic interventions, including signs of elevated intracranial pressure and herniation, acute neurovascular emergencies, clinical or subclinical seizures, infections of the central nervous system, spinal cord compression, and acute neuromuscular respiratory failure. Prompt neuroimaging to identify structural abnormalities should be obtained, complemented by laboratory findings to assess for underlying systemic causes. The indication for EEG and lumbar puncture should be considered early based on clinical suspicion.</p><p><strong>Essential points: </strong>In neurocritical care, the initial evaluation is often fast paced, requiring assessment and management to happen in parallel. History, clinical examination, and workup should be obtained while considering therapeutic implications and the need for lifesaving interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"556-587\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/CON.0000000000001438\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CON.0000000000001438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: This article provides an overview of the evaluation of patients in neurocritical care settings and a structured approach to recognizing and localizing acute neurologic emergencies, performing a focused examination, and pursuing workup to identify critical findings requiring urgent management.
Latest developments: After identifying and stabilizing imminent threats to survival, including respiratory and hemodynamic compromise, the initial differential diagnosis for patients in neurocritical care is built on a focused history and clinical examination, always keeping in mind critical "must-not-miss" pathologies. A key priority is to identify processes warranting time-sensitive therapeutic interventions, including signs of elevated intracranial pressure and herniation, acute neurovascular emergencies, clinical or subclinical seizures, infections of the central nervous system, spinal cord compression, and acute neuromuscular respiratory failure. Prompt neuroimaging to identify structural abnormalities should be obtained, complemented by laboratory findings to assess for underlying systemic causes. The indication for EEG and lumbar puncture should be considered early based on clinical suspicion.
Essential points: In neurocritical care, the initial evaluation is often fast paced, requiring assessment and management to happen in parallel. History, clinical examination, and workup should be obtained while considering therapeutic implications and the need for lifesaving interventions.
期刊介绍:
Continue your professional development on your own schedule with Continuum: Lifelong Learning in Neurology®, the American Academy of Neurology" self-study continuing medical education publication. Six times a year you"ll learn from neurology"s experts in a convenient format for home or office. Each issue includes diagnostic and treatment outlines, clinical case studies, a topic-relevant ethics case, detailed patient management problem, and a multiple-choice self-assessment examination.