儿科医护人员列表网上的性别交流差异。

Q1 Nursing
Jessica M Allan, Erik Black, Nina Lemieux, Courtney A Gilliam, Jeremy Yardley, Juliann L Kim, Jorge Ganem, Nicole Paradise Black, Alan R Schroeder, Shawn Ralston, H Barrett Fromme
{"title":"儿科医护人员列表网上的性别交流差异。","authors":"Jessica M Allan, Erik Black, Nina Lemieux, Courtney A Gilliam, Jeremy Yardley, Juliann L Kim, Jorge Ganem, Nicole Paradise Black, Alan R Schroeder, Shawn Ralston, H Barrett Fromme","doi":"10.1542/hpeds.2023-007630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Gender-based communication differences are described in educational online communities, but have not been rigorously evaluated in medical online communities. Understanding gender differences in communication may provide insight into gender disparities in the medical profession. Our objective was to describe gender differences in post frequency, content, and language styles on the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Hospital Medicine (SOHM) listserv.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Posts were obtained from publicly available SOHM listserv archives. The first month of every quarter of 2019 and 2020 were reviewed. Two reviewers assigned a post topic (clinical, research, etc) and format (question vs statement) to all deidentified original posts (K = 1.0 topic, 0.89 format). Six trained reviewers assigned language styles (intraclass coefficient = 0.73, indicating good agreement).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 1592 posts: 287 original posts and 1305 responses. Frequency: Women authored 50% of posts. The 9 most frequent posters (7 men, 2 women) accounted for 19.5% of posts. Content: Men's posts had more words than women's (132.51 vs 112.3, P ≤ .01). Men were more likely to post about health policy and research (P < .001). Men were more likely to post statements compared with women (39% vs 21%, P < .001). Style: Men's posts were more likely to be coded adversarial (12.3% vs 5.5%, P < .001) authoritative (12.2% vs 6.5%, P < .001) or self-amplifying (6.5% vs 3.6%, P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women contribute disproportionately fewer posts to the American Academy of Pediatrics SOHM listserv compared with their percentage in the subspecialty. We noted significant gender differences in language style and content, which may impact career development and online community inclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":38180,"journal":{"name":"Hospital pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender Communication Differences on a Pediatric Provider Listserv.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica M Allan, Erik Black, Nina Lemieux, Courtney A Gilliam, Jeremy Yardley, Juliann L Kim, Jorge Ganem, Nicole Paradise Black, Alan R Schroeder, Shawn Ralston, H Barrett Fromme\",\"doi\":\"10.1542/hpeds.2023-007630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Gender-based communication differences are described in educational online communities, but have not been rigorously evaluated in medical online communities. Understanding gender differences in communication may provide insight into gender disparities in the medical profession. Our objective was to describe gender differences in post frequency, content, and language styles on the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Hospital Medicine (SOHM) listserv.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Posts were obtained from publicly available SOHM listserv archives. The first month of every quarter of 2019 and 2020 were reviewed. Two reviewers assigned a post topic (clinical, research, etc) and format (question vs statement) to all deidentified original posts (K = 1.0 topic, 0.89 format). Six trained reviewers assigned language styles (intraclass coefficient = 0.73, indicating good agreement).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 1592 posts: 287 original posts and 1305 responses. Frequency: Women authored 50% of posts. The 9 most frequent posters (7 men, 2 women) accounted for 19.5% of posts. Content: Men's posts had more words than women's (132.51 vs 112.3, P ≤ .01). Men were more likely to post about health policy and research (P < .001). Men were more likely to post statements compared with women (39% vs 21%, P < .001). Style: Men's posts were more likely to be coded adversarial (12.3% vs 5.5%, P < .001) authoritative (12.2% vs 6.5%, P < .001) or self-amplifying (6.5% vs 3.6%, P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women contribute disproportionately fewer posts to the American Academy of Pediatrics SOHM listserv compared with their percentage in the subspecialty. We noted significant gender differences in language style and content, which may impact career development and online community inclusion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital pediatrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2023-007630\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2023-007630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:基于性别的交流差异在教育在线社区中有所描述,但在医疗在线社区中尚未进行严格评估。了解交流中的性别差异可能有助于深入了解医疗行业中的性别差异。我们的目的是描述美国儿科学会医院医学分会(SOHM)列表服务中发帖频率、内容和语言风格的性别差异:我们从公开的 SOHM 列表服务器档案中获取了帖子内容。对 2019 年和 2020 年每个季度的第一个月进行了审查。两名审稿人为所有去身份化的原始帖子指定了帖子主题(临床、研究等)和格式(问题与陈述)(K = 1.0 主题,0.89 格式)。六名训练有素的审稿人对语言风格进行了分配(类内系数 = 0.73,表明一致性良好):我们分析了 1592 篇帖子:结果:我们分析了 1592 篇帖子:287 篇原创帖子和 1305 篇回复。频率:50%的帖子由女性撰写。最常见的 9 位发帖人(7 位男性,2 位女性)占帖子总数的 19.5%。内容:男性帖子的字数多于女性(132.51 对 112.3,P ≤ .01)。男性更有可能发表有关卫生政策和研究的帖子(P < .001)。与女性相比,男性更倾向于发表声明(39% vs 21%,P < .001)。风格:男性的帖子更有可能被编码为对抗性(12.3% vs 5.5%,P < .001)、权威性(12.2% vs 6.5%,P < .001)或自我强化(6.5% vs 3.6%,P < .001):结论:在美国儿科学会 SOHM 列表服务器中,女性发表的帖子数量远远少于她们在亚专科中所占的比例。我们注意到在语言风格和内容方面存在明显的性别差异,这可能会影响职业发展和在线社区的包容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender Communication Differences on a Pediatric Provider Listserv.

Background and objectives: Gender-based communication differences are described in educational online communities, but have not been rigorously evaluated in medical online communities. Understanding gender differences in communication may provide insight into gender disparities in the medical profession. Our objective was to describe gender differences in post frequency, content, and language styles on the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Hospital Medicine (SOHM) listserv.

Methods: Posts were obtained from publicly available SOHM listserv archives. The first month of every quarter of 2019 and 2020 were reviewed. Two reviewers assigned a post topic (clinical, research, etc) and format (question vs statement) to all deidentified original posts (K = 1.0 topic, 0.89 format). Six trained reviewers assigned language styles (intraclass coefficient = 0.73, indicating good agreement).

Results: We analyzed 1592 posts: 287 original posts and 1305 responses. Frequency: Women authored 50% of posts. The 9 most frequent posters (7 men, 2 women) accounted for 19.5% of posts. Content: Men's posts had more words than women's (132.51 vs 112.3, P ≤ .01). Men were more likely to post about health policy and research (P < .001). Men were more likely to post statements compared with women (39% vs 21%, P < .001). Style: Men's posts were more likely to be coded adversarial (12.3% vs 5.5%, P < .001) authoritative (12.2% vs 6.5%, P < .001) or self-amplifying (6.5% vs 3.6%, P < .001).

Conclusions: Women contribute disproportionately fewer posts to the American Academy of Pediatrics SOHM listserv compared with their percentage in the subspecialty. We noted significant gender differences in language style and content, which may impact career development and online community inclusion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital pediatrics
Hospital pediatrics Nursing-Pediatrics
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
204
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信