脑震荡后的睡眠:传感器技术的范围审查。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of neurotrauma Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1089/neu.2023.0526
Ryan Takagi, Chamin Wanasundara, Lyndia Wu, Osman Ipsiroglu, Calvin Kuo
{"title":"脑震荡后的睡眠:传感器技术的范围审查。","authors":"Ryan Takagi, Chamin Wanasundara, Lyndia Wu, Osman Ipsiroglu, Calvin Kuo","doi":"10.1089/neu.2023.0526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sleep disturbances following a concussion/mild traumatic brain injury are associated with longer recovery times and more comorbidities. Sensor technologies can directly monitor sleep-related physiology and provide objective sleep metrics. This scoping review determines how sensor technologies are currently used to monitor sleep following a concussion. We searched Ovid (Medline, Embase), Web of Science, CINAHL, Compendex Engineering Village, and PsycINFO from inception to June 20, 2022, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for scoping reviews. Included studies objectively monitored sleep in participants with concussion. We screened 1081 articles and included 37 in the review. A total of 17 studies implemented polysomnography (PSG) months to years after injury for a median of two nights and provided a wide range of sleep metrics, including sleep-wake times, sleep stages, arousal indices, and periodic limb movements. Twenty-two studies used actigraphy days to weeks after injury for a median of 10 days and nights and provided information limited to sleep-wake times. Sleep stages were most reported in PSG studies, and sleep efficiency was most reported in actigraphy studies. For both technologies there was high variability in reported outcome measures. Sleep sensing technologies may be used to identify how sleep affects concussion recovery. However, high variability in sensor deployment methodologies makes cross-study comparisons difficult and highlights the need for standardization. Consensus on how sleep sensing technologies are used post-concussion may lead to clinical integration with subjective methods for improved sleep monitoring during the recovery period.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":"1827-1841"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sleep After Concussion: A Scoping Review of Sensor Technologies.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Takagi, Chamin Wanasundara, Lyndia Wu, Osman Ipsiroglu, Calvin Kuo\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/neu.2023.0526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sleep disturbances following a concussion/mild traumatic brain injury are associated with longer recovery times and more comorbidities. Sensor technologies can directly monitor sleep-related physiology and provide objective sleep metrics. This scoping review determines how sensor technologies are currently used to monitor sleep following a concussion. We searched Ovid (Medline, Embase), Web of Science, CINAHL, Compendex Engineering Village, and PsycINFO from inception to June 20, 2022, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for scoping reviews. Included studies objectively monitored sleep in participants with concussion. We screened 1081 articles and included 37 in the review. A total of 17 studies implemented polysomnography (PSG) months to years after injury for a median of two nights and provided a wide range of sleep metrics, including sleep-wake times, sleep stages, arousal indices, and periodic limb movements. Twenty-two studies used actigraphy days to weeks after injury for a median of 10 days and nights and provided information limited to sleep-wake times. Sleep stages were most reported in PSG studies, and sleep efficiency was most reported in actigraphy studies. For both technologies there was high variability in reported outcome measures. Sleep sensing technologies may be used to identify how sleep affects concussion recovery. However, high variability in sensor deployment methodologies makes cross-study comparisons difficult and highlights the need for standardization. Consensus on how sleep sensing technologies are used post-concussion may lead to clinical integration with subjective methods for improved sleep monitoring during the recovery period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurotrauma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1827-1841\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurotrauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2023.0526\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2023.0526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脑震荡/轻微脑损伤(mTBI)后的睡眠障碍与更长的恢复时间和更多的并发症有关。传感器技术可以直接监测与睡眠相关的生理机能,并提供客观的睡眠指标。本范围界定综述确定了目前如何使用传感器技术来监测脑震荡后的睡眠情况。我们按照范围界定综述的 PRISMA 指南,检索了 Ovid(Medline、Embase)、Web of Science、CINAHL、Compendex Engineering Village 和 PsychInfo 从开始到 2022 年 6 月 20 日的数据。纳入的研究客观监测了脑震荡参与者的睡眠情况。我们筛选了 1081 篇文章,并将 37 篇纳入综述。17 项研究在伤后数月至数年内实施了多导睡眠图 (PSG),中位时间为 2 晚,并提供了一系列睡眠指标,包括睡眠-觉醒时间、睡眠阶段、唤醒指数和周期性肢体运动。PSG 研究中报告最多的是睡眠阶段,而动图法研究中报告最多的是睡眠效率。22 项研究在受伤后数天至数周内使用了动图,中位时间为 10 个昼夜,提供的信息仅限于睡眠-觉醒时间。对于这两种技术,所报告的结果测量值差异很大。睡眠传感技术可用于确定睡眠如何影响脑震荡的恢复。由于传感器部署方法差异较大,因此很难进行跨研究比较,这也凸显了标准化的必要性。就睡眠传感技术的整合达成共识将最终促成睡眠监测的临床转化,并改善脑震荡后的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sleep After Concussion: A Scoping Review of Sensor Technologies.

Sleep disturbances following a concussion/mild traumatic brain injury are associated with longer recovery times and more comorbidities. Sensor technologies can directly monitor sleep-related physiology and provide objective sleep metrics. This scoping review determines how sensor technologies are currently used to monitor sleep following a concussion. We searched Ovid (Medline, Embase), Web of Science, CINAHL, Compendex Engineering Village, and PsycINFO from inception to June 20, 2022, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for scoping reviews. Included studies objectively monitored sleep in participants with concussion. We screened 1081 articles and included 37 in the review. A total of 17 studies implemented polysomnography (PSG) months to years after injury for a median of two nights and provided a wide range of sleep metrics, including sleep-wake times, sleep stages, arousal indices, and periodic limb movements. Twenty-two studies used actigraphy days to weeks after injury for a median of 10 days and nights and provided information limited to sleep-wake times. Sleep stages were most reported in PSG studies, and sleep efficiency was most reported in actigraphy studies. For both technologies there was high variability in reported outcome measures. Sleep sensing technologies may be used to identify how sleep affects concussion recovery. However, high variability in sensor deployment methodologies makes cross-study comparisons difficult and highlights the need for standardization. Consensus on how sleep sensing technologies are used post-concussion may lead to clinical integration with subjective methods for improved sleep monitoring during the recovery period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurotrauma
Journal of neurotrauma 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
233
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurotrauma is the flagship, peer-reviewed publication for reporting on the latest advances in both the clinical and laboratory investigation of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. The Journal focuses on the basic pathobiology of injury to the central nervous system, while considering preclinical and clinical trials targeted at improving both the early management and long-term care and recovery of traumatically injured patients. This is the essential journal publishing cutting-edge basic and translational research in traumatically injured human and animal studies, with emphasis on neurodegenerative disease research linked to CNS trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信