用于车载 adhoc 网络通信的反应式路由协议比较分析

Payal Kaushal, Meenu Khurana, Ketti Ramchandran Ramkumar
{"title":"用于车载 adhoc 网络通信的反应式路由协议比较分析","authors":"Payal Kaushal, Meenu Khurana, Ketti Ramchandran Ramkumar","doi":"10.11591/eei.v13i3.5322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the recent past, vehicular adhoc networks (VANETs) have gained a lot of importance. The routing protocols play a vital role to deliver payloads from one vehicle to another one while they are moving at relative speeds. It is a challenging task to select a routing protocol for VANETs because of the uneven distribution and high mobility of vehicles. In this paper, we have analysed the two standard reactive protocols, adhoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) and ant colony optimization (ACO). The performance comparison of AODV and ACO routing protocols has been presented in this paper. The results show AODV performed better in terms of energy consumption and routing overhead. While considering the throughput, energy loss ratio, and delay ACO has performed. ACO resulted as upperhand.","PeriodicalId":502860,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics","volume":"4 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of reactive routing protocols for vehicular adhoc network communications\",\"authors\":\"Payal Kaushal, Meenu Khurana, Ketti Ramchandran Ramkumar\",\"doi\":\"10.11591/eei.v13i3.5322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the recent past, vehicular adhoc networks (VANETs) have gained a lot of importance. The routing protocols play a vital role to deliver payloads from one vehicle to another one while they are moving at relative speeds. It is a challenging task to select a routing protocol for VANETs because of the uneven distribution and high mobility of vehicles. In this paper, we have analysed the two standard reactive protocols, adhoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) and ant colony optimization (ACO). The performance comparison of AODV and ACO routing protocols has been presented in this paper. The results show AODV performed better in terms of energy consumption and routing overhead. While considering the throughput, energy loss ratio, and delay ACO has performed. ACO resulted as upperhand.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics\",\"volume\":\"4 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v13i3.5322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v13i3.5322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,车载 adhoc 网络(VANET)变得越来越重要。当车辆以相对速度行驶时,路由协议在将有效载荷从一辆车传送到另一辆车的过程中发挥着至关重要的作用。由于车辆分布不均且流动性高,为 VANET 选择路由协议是一项具有挑战性的任务。在本文中,我们分析了两种标准的反应式协议,即按需路由协议(AODV)和蚁群优化协议(ACO)。本文对 AODV 和 ACO 路由协议的性能进行了比较。结果显示,AODV 在能耗和路由开销方面表现更好。在考虑吞吐量、能量损失率和延迟时,ACO 的表现更好。ACO 的结果占优。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of reactive routing protocols for vehicular adhoc network communications
In the recent past, vehicular adhoc networks (VANETs) have gained a lot of importance. The routing protocols play a vital role to deliver payloads from one vehicle to another one while they are moving at relative speeds. It is a challenging task to select a routing protocol for VANETs because of the uneven distribution and high mobility of vehicles. In this paper, we have analysed the two standard reactive protocols, adhoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) and ant colony optimization (ACO). The performance comparison of AODV and ACO routing protocols has been presented in this paper. The results show AODV performed better in terms of energy consumption and routing overhead. While considering the throughput, energy loss ratio, and delay ACO has performed. ACO resulted as upperhand.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信