Sri Yulianto Joko Prasetyo, Wiwin Sulistyo, Erwien Christanto, Bistok Hasiholan Simanjuntak
{"title":"利用机器学习和哨兵 2A 卫星图像探测建筑密集区海啸波浪危害的计算机模型","authors":"Sri Yulianto Joko Prasetyo, Wiwin Sulistyo, Erwien Christanto, Bistok Hasiholan Simanjuntak","doi":"10.11591/ijai.v13.i2.pp1535-1546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research is to compile a tsunami wave hazard scale based on built-up land density extracted and classified by machine learning from Sentinel 2A satellite and digital elevation model (DEM) imageries. This research was carried out in 5 stages, namely: (i) pre-processing of Sentinel 2A and DEM images, (ii) Classification of VI data using the machine learning algorithms, (iii) Spatial prediction using the ordinary kriging method, (iv) Field testing using the confusion matrix method, (v) Preparation of decision matrix for tsunami wave hazard. The results of the study show that the most accurate classification algorithm for classifying built-up indices data is the k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) algorithm. The results of the statistical accuracy test show that the most accurate is normalized difference built-up index (NDBI) with a mean of square error (MSE) value of 0.073 and a mean of absolute error (MAE) of 0.003. DEM analysis shows that the research area is at an altitude of 0–15 meters above sea level so it is in the high vulnerability to medium vulnerability category. Field testing showed user accuracy of 91.11%, manufacturer accuracy of 92.16%, and overall average accuracy of 91%.","PeriodicalId":507934,"journal":{"name":"IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computer model for detecting tsunami wave hazard on built-up land using machine learning and sentinel 2A satellite imagery\",\"authors\":\"Sri Yulianto Joko Prasetyo, Wiwin Sulistyo, Erwien Christanto, Bistok Hasiholan Simanjuntak\",\"doi\":\"10.11591/ijai.v13.i2.pp1535-1546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this research is to compile a tsunami wave hazard scale based on built-up land density extracted and classified by machine learning from Sentinel 2A satellite and digital elevation model (DEM) imageries. This research was carried out in 5 stages, namely: (i) pre-processing of Sentinel 2A and DEM images, (ii) Classification of VI data using the machine learning algorithms, (iii) Spatial prediction using the ordinary kriging method, (iv) Field testing using the confusion matrix method, (v) Preparation of decision matrix for tsunami wave hazard. The results of the study show that the most accurate classification algorithm for classifying built-up indices data is the k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) algorithm. The results of the statistical accuracy test show that the most accurate is normalized difference built-up index (NDBI) with a mean of square error (MSE) value of 0.073 and a mean of absolute error (MAE) of 0.003. DEM analysis shows that the research area is at an altitude of 0–15 meters above sea level so it is in the high vulnerability to medium vulnerability category. Field testing showed user accuracy of 91.11%, manufacturer accuracy of 92.16%, and overall average accuracy of 91%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11591/ijai.v13.i2.pp1535-1546\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11591/ijai.v13.i2.pp1535-1546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是从哨兵 2A 卫星和数字高程模型(DEM)图像中通过机器学习提取并分类的建筑密集度为基础,编制海啸波浪危害等级表。这项研究分五个阶段进行,即:(i) 对 Sentinel 2A 和 DEM 图像进行预处理;(ii) 利用机器学习算法对 VI 数据进行分类;(iii) 利用普通克里金法进行空间预测;(iv) 利用混淆矩阵法进行实地测试;(v) 编制海啸波浪危害决策矩阵。研究结果表明,对已建指数数据进行分类的最准确分类算法是 k 近邻(k-NN)算法。统计准确性测试结果表明,最准确的是归一化差异建成指数(NDBI),其平均平方误差(MSE)值为 0.073,平均绝对误差(MAE)为 0.003。DEM 分析表明,研究区域的海拔高度为 0-15 米,因此属于高脆弱度到中等脆弱度类别。实地测试显示,用户准确率为 91.11%,制造商准确率为 92.16%,总体平均准确率为 91%。
Computer model for detecting tsunami wave hazard on built-up land using machine learning and sentinel 2A satellite imagery
The aim of this research is to compile a tsunami wave hazard scale based on built-up land density extracted and classified by machine learning from Sentinel 2A satellite and digital elevation model (DEM) imageries. This research was carried out in 5 stages, namely: (i) pre-processing of Sentinel 2A and DEM images, (ii) Classification of VI data using the machine learning algorithms, (iii) Spatial prediction using the ordinary kriging method, (iv) Field testing using the confusion matrix method, (v) Preparation of decision matrix for tsunami wave hazard. The results of the study show that the most accurate classification algorithm for classifying built-up indices data is the k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) algorithm. The results of the statistical accuracy test show that the most accurate is normalized difference built-up index (NDBI) with a mean of square error (MSE) value of 0.073 and a mean of absolute error (MAE) of 0.003. DEM analysis shows that the research area is at an altitude of 0–15 meters above sea level so it is in the high vulnerability to medium vulnerability category. Field testing showed user accuracy of 91.11%, manufacturer accuracy of 92.16%, and overall average accuracy of 91%.