Anazel P. Gamilla, Anjela C. Tolentino, Reina T. Payongayong
{"title":"校园区域网络轮循与 SD-WAN 负载平衡性能对比分析","authors":"Anazel P. Gamilla, Anjela C. Tolentino, Reina T. Payongayong","doi":"10.11591/eei.v13i3.5945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Efficient load balancing is crucial for optimizing network performance and ensuring seamless connectivity in modern campus area networks (CANs). With the proliferation of data-intensive applications and the increasing reliance on cloud-based services, organizations are seeking effective load-balancing solutions to distribute network traffic evenly across available resources. The continuous improvement of devices, tools, and techniques to cater a large amount of network traffic, started to be employed on different campuses. Understanding the best approach to maximize the utilization of the network resources is crucial in order to stabilize and maintain the network. The study aims to discern the round-robin and software defined-wide area network (SD-WAN) techniques based on defined metrics and conducted with a predefined payload for commonly used application conditions. The analysis shows that SD-WAN delivers a much superior performance than round-robin based on the criteria. The local area network (LAN) test shows difference between the two types of technology for the three given metrics. The WAN test shows that the round-robin has higher packet loss, latency, and jitter than the SD-WAN technology. While round-robin may suffice for small-scale deployments with relatively homogeneous traffic patterns, SD-WAN offers more sophisticated capabilities for larger CANs with diverse application workloads and distributed locations.","PeriodicalId":502860,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics","volume":"6 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A discernment of round-robin vs SD-WAN load-balancing performance for campus area network\",\"authors\":\"Anazel P. Gamilla, Anjela C. Tolentino, Reina T. Payongayong\",\"doi\":\"10.11591/eei.v13i3.5945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Efficient load balancing is crucial for optimizing network performance and ensuring seamless connectivity in modern campus area networks (CANs). With the proliferation of data-intensive applications and the increasing reliance on cloud-based services, organizations are seeking effective load-balancing solutions to distribute network traffic evenly across available resources. The continuous improvement of devices, tools, and techniques to cater a large amount of network traffic, started to be employed on different campuses. Understanding the best approach to maximize the utilization of the network resources is crucial in order to stabilize and maintain the network. The study aims to discern the round-robin and software defined-wide area network (SD-WAN) techniques based on defined metrics and conducted with a predefined payload for commonly used application conditions. The analysis shows that SD-WAN delivers a much superior performance than round-robin based on the criteria. The local area network (LAN) test shows difference between the two types of technology for the three given metrics. The WAN test shows that the round-robin has higher packet loss, latency, and jitter than the SD-WAN technology. While round-robin may suffice for small-scale deployments with relatively homogeneous traffic patterns, SD-WAN offers more sophisticated capabilities for larger CANs with diverse application workloads and distributed locations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics\",\"volume\":\"6 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v13i3.5945\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v13i3.5945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
高效的负载平衡对于优化网络性能和确保现代园区区域网络(CAN)的无缝连接至关重要。随着数据密集型应用的激增和对基于云的服务的日益依赖,企业正在寻求有效的负载平衡解决方案,以便在可用资源之间平均分配网络流量。为满足大量网络流量的需求,设备、工具和技术不断改进,并开始在不同的校园使用。为了稳定和维护网络,了解最大限度地利用网络资源的最佳方法至关重要。本研究旨在根据定义的指标,对循环和软件定义广域网(SD-WAN)技术进行鉴别,并针对常用的应用条件使用预定义的有效载荷。分析表明,根据标准,SD-WAN 的性能远远优于轮循技术。局域网(LAN)测试显示了两种技术在三个给定指标上的差异。广域网测试表明,轮循技术的丢包、延迟和抖动都高于 SD-WAN 技术。对于流量模式相对单一的小规模部署来说,轮循技术已经足够,而对于具有不同应用工作负载和分布式地点的大型 CAN 来说,SD-WAN 能提供更复杂的功能。
A discernment of round-robin vs SD-WAN load-balancing performance for campus area network
Efficient load balancing is crucial for optimizing network performance and ensuring seamless connectivity in modern campus area networks (CANs). With the proliferation of data-intensive applications and the increasing reliance on cloud-based services, organizations are seeking effective load-balancing solutions to distribute network traffic evenly across available resources. The continuous improvement of devices, tools, and techniques to cater a large amount of network traffic, started to be employed on different campuses. Understanding the best approach to maximize the utilization of the network resources is crucial in order to stabilize and maintain the network. The study aims to discern the round-robin and software defined-wide area network (SD-WAN) techniques based on defined metrics and conducted with a predefined payload for commonly used application conditions. The analysis shows that SD-WAN delivers a much superior performance than round-robin based on the criteria. The local area network (LAN) test shows difference between the two types of technology for the three given metrics. The WAN test shows that the round-robin has higher packet loss, latency, and jitter than the SD-WAN technology. While round-robin may suffice for small-scale deployments with relatively homogeneous traffic patterns, SD-WAN offers more sophisticated capabilities for larger CANs with diverse application workloads and distributed locations.