{"title":"多份额基金是否管理不善?","authors":"Jonathan Handy, Tom Smythe","doi":"10.61190/fsr.v28i1.3415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Utilizing independent Morningstar Stewardship Grades, this article finds that multiple share class mutual funds (MS funds) have lower quality governance. Ordered probit regressions indicate MS funds are more likely to have lower board quality ratings and managerial incentive ratings, additional evidence the MS structure has not provided the benefits initially put forth by supporters. The results continue to demonstrate that less sophisticated investors seeking financial advice (those typically utilizing MS funds) may potentially be directed to funds that underperform and have higher costs.","PeriodicalId":100530,"journal":{"name":"Financial Services Review","volume":" 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are multiple share class funds poorly governed?\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Handy, Tom Smythe\",\"doi\":\"10.61190/fsr.v28i1.3415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Utilizing independent Morningstar Stewardship Grades, this article finds that multiple share class mutual funds (MS funds) have lower quality governance. Ordered probit regressions indicate MS funds are more likely to have lower board quality ratings and managerial incentive ratings, additional evidence the MS structure has not provided the benefits initially put forth by supporters. The results continue to demonstrate that less sophisticated investors seeking financial advice (those typically utilizing MS funds) may potentially be directed to funds that underperform and have higher costs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Financial Services Review\",\"volume\":\" 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Financial Services Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v28i1.3415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v28i1.3415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
本文利用独立的晨星管理评级(Morningstar Stewardship Grades)发现,多份额共同基金(MS 基金)的治理质量较低。有序 probit 回归表明,MS 基金的董事会质量评级和管理者激励评级更有可能较低,这进一步证明了 MS 结构并未带来支持者最初提出的好处。研究结果继续表明,寻求财务咨询的不太成熟的投资者(通常使用 MS 基金的投资者)可能会被引导到业绩不佳、成本较高的基金。
Utilizing independent Morningstar Stewardship Grades, this article finds that multiple share class mutual funds (MS funds) have lower quality governance. Ordered probit regressions indicate MS funds are more likely to have lower board quality ratings and managerial incentive ratings, additional evidence the MS structure has not provided the benefits initially put forth by supporters. The results continue to demonstrate that less sophisticated investors seeking financial advice (those typically utilizing MS funds) may potentially be directed to funds that underperform and have higher costs.