基于酶联免疫吸附试验的微中和试验与血凝抑制试验在评估甲型 H1N1 流感病毒中和抗体方面的灵敏度和特异性比较

A. Tavakoli, F. Rezaei, Gazal Sadat Fatemi Nasab, Fatemeh Adjaminezhad-Fard, Zahra Noroozbabaei, T. Mokhtari-azad
{"title":"基于酶联免疫吸附试验的微中和试验与血凝抑制试验在评估甲型 H1N1 流感病毒中和抗体方面的灵敏度和特异性比较","authors":"A. Tavakoli, F. Rezaei, Gazal Sadat Fatemi Nasab, Fatemeh Adjaminezhad-Fard, Zahra Noroozbabaei, T. Mokhtari-azad","doi":"10.7176/jmpb/65-08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of ELISA-based microneutralization test with hemaglutination inhibition test for the evaluation of neutralizing antibody against influenza virus (H1N1). Study Design: Nonrandomized Quasi Trail. Study Place and Study Duration: Department of Medicine, Allama Iqbal memorial teaching hospital, Sialkot and Nishtar Hospital Multan. January 2018 to May 2019. Material and methods: A total of 188 patients were enrolled in our study out of which 101 suffered from influenza type A. Serum samples were collected from different staff members during this period. ELISA based Microneutralization test was performed in 101 samples and similarly Hemagglutination assay was also performed in 101 serum samples. Tests were run twice on two separate days and final result was average of the two runs. All the data thus obtained was subjected to statistical analysis. Frequency and percentages were calculated for qualitative variables like, gender, sensitivity and specificity, while mean and standard deviation was calculated for quantitative variables like, age and BMI. Results: Both the tests were performed on all the sera samples. The sensitivity of the Hemagglutination Inhibition Test (HI) was 65.34% and the specificity was 66.51%. On the contrary, the sensitivity was 87.12% and specificity was 90.80% on the ELISA based microneutralization assay (micro NT-ELISA). As the sensitivity and specificity of the micro NT-ELISA is more than that of Hemagglutination Inhibition Test, this makes ELISA based microneutralization assay superior. Conclusion: ELISA based microneutralization test is much more sensitive and specific as compared to the hemaglutination inhibitor assay in terms of detection of neutralizing antibodies against influenza virus (H1N1). Keywords: Microneutralization, Hemagglutination, Influenza DOI: 10.7176/JMPB/65-08 Publication date: April 30 th 2020","PeriodicalId":16339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine, Physiology and Biophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Comparison of Sensitivity and Specificity of ELISA-based Microneutralization Test with Hemagglutination Inhibition Test to Evaluate Neutralizing Antibody against Influenza Virus (H1N1)\",\"authors\":\"A. Tavakoli, F. Rezaei, Gazal Sadat Fatemi Nasab, Fatemeh Adjaminezhad-Fard, Zahra Noroozbabaei, T. Mokhtari-azad\",\"doi\":\"10.7176/jmpb/65-08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of ELISA-based microneutralization test with hemaglutination inhibition test for the evaluation of neutralizing antibody against influenza virus (H1N1). Study Design: Nonrandomized Quasi Trail. Study Place and Study Duration: Department of Medicine, Allama Iqbal memorial teaching hospital, Sialkot and Nishtar Hospital Multan. January 2018 to May 2019. Material and methods: A total of 188 patients were enrolled in our study out of which 101 suffered from influenza type A. Serum samples were collected from different staff members during this period. ELISA based Microneutralization test was performed in 101 samples and similarly Hemagglutination assay was also performed in 101 serum samples. Tests were run twice on two separate days and final result was average of the two runs. All the data thus obtained was subjected to statistical analysis. Frequency and percentages were calculated for qualitative variables like, gender, sensitivity and specificity, while mean and standard deviation was calculated for quantitative variables like, age and BMI. Results: Both the tests were performed on all the sera samples. The sensitivity of the Hemagglutination Inhibition Test (HI) was 65.34% and the specificity was 66.51%. On the contrary, the sensitivity was 87.12% and specificity was 90.80% on the ELISA based microneutralization assay (micro NT-ELISA). As the sensitivity and specificity of the micro NT-ELISA is more than that of Hemagglutination Inhibition Test, this makes ELISA based microneutralization assay superior. Conclusion: ELISA based microneutralization test is much more sensitive and specific as compared to the hemaglutination inhibitor assay in terms of detection of neutralizing antibodies against influenza virus (H1N1). Keywords: Microneutralization, Hemagglutination, Influenza DOI: 10.7176/JMPB/65-08 Publication date: April 30 th 2020\",\"PeriodicalId\":16339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medicine, Physiology and Biophysics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medicine, Physiology and Biophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7176/jmpb/65-08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine, Physiology and Biophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7176/jmpb/65-08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

目的比较基于 ELISA 的微中和试验与血凝抑制试验在评估甲型 H1N1 流感病毒中和抗体方面的灵敏度和特异性。研究设计:非随机准试验。研究地点和研究时间:锡亚尔科特阿拉玛-伊克巴尔纪念教学医院医学系和木尔坦尼什塔尔医院。2018年1月至2019年5月。材料和方法:共有 188 名患者参与了研究,其中 101 人患有甲型流感,在此期间从不同的工作人员处采集了血清样本。对 101 份样本进行了基于 ELISA 的微中和检测,并对 101 份血清样本进行了类似的血凝检测。测试分别在两天内进行两次,最终结果为两次测试的平均值。由此获得的所有数据都进行了统计分析。对性别、灵敏度和特异性等定性变量计算了频率和百分比,对年龄和体重指数等定量变量计算了平均值和标准偏差。结果:对所有血清样本都进行了这两项检测。血凝抑制试验(HI)的灵敏度为 65.34%,特异性为 66.51%。相反,基于酶联免疫吸附试验的微量中和试验(微量 NT-ELISA)的灵敏度为 87.12%,特异性为 90.80%。由于微量 NT-ELISA 的灵敏度和特异性均高于血凝抑制试验,因此基于 ELISA 的微量中和试验更具优势。结论在检测甲型 H1N1 流感病毒中和抗体方面,基于 ELISA 的微量中和试验比血凝抑制试验更灵敏、更特异。关键词微中和 血凝抑制 流感 DOI: 10.7176/JMPB/65-08 出版日期:2020年4月30日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Comparison of Sensitivity and Specificity of ELISA-based Microneutralization Test with Hemagglutination Inhibition Test to Evaluate Neutralizing Antibody against Influenza Virus (H1N1)
Objective: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of ELISA-based microneutralization test with hemaglutination inhibition test for the evaluation of neutralizing antibody against influenza virus (H1N1). Study Design: Nonrandomized Quasi Trail. Study Place and Study Duration: Department of Medicine, Allama Iqbal memorial teaching hospital, Sialkot and Nishtar Hospital Multan. January 2018 to May 2019. Material and methods: A total of 188 patients were enrolled in our study out of which 101 suffered from influenza type A. Serum samples were collected from different staff members during this period. ELISA based Microneutralization test was performed in 101 samples and similarly Hemagglutination assay was also performed in 101 serum samples. Tests were run twice on two separate days and final result was average of the two runs. All the data thus obtained was subjected to statistical analysis. Frequency and percentages were calculated for qualitative variables like, gender, sensitivity and specificity, while mean and standard deviation was calculated for quantitative variables like, age and BMI. Results: Both the tests were performed on all the sera samples. The sensitivity of the Hemagglutination Inhibition Test (HI) was 65.34% and the specificity was 66.51%. On the contrary, the sensitivity was 87.12% and specificity was 90.80% on the ELISA based microneutralization assay (micro NT-ELISA). As the sensitivity and specificity of the micro NT-ELISA is more than that of Hemagglutination Inhibition Test, this makes ELISA based microneutralization assay superior. Conclusion: ELISA based microneutralization test is much more sensitive and specific as compared to the hemaglutination inhibitor assay in terms of detection of neutralizing antibodies against influenza virus (H1N1). Keywords: Microneutralization, Hemagglutination, Influenza DOI: 10.7176/JMPB/65-08 Publication date: April 30 th 2020
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信