{"title":"关于适应的起源:重新思考忠实性论述和 \"成功\"--从生物学角度","authors":"Linda Hutcheon, G. Bortolotti","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0014.1357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Like the early evolutionary theory (though unlike Darwin’s own output), much work in literary\nadaptation today operates only in terms of higher and lower forms, considering adaptations\nas more or less „faithful” to the „original”. In biology, it was only when this sort of evaluative discourse\nwas discarded that new questions could be asked and therefore new answers offered. To that\nend, a biologist and a literary theorist work to develop the homology between biological and cultural\nadaptation, between natural and cultural selection: stories, in a manner parallel to genes, replicate;\nadaptations of both evolve with changing environments. Their „success” cannot and should\nnot, in either case, be limited to their degree of „fidelity” to anything called a „source” or „original”.\n\n","PeriodicalId":515211,"journal":{"name":"Tekstualia","volume":"59 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Origin of Adaptations: Rethinking Fidelity Discourse and „Success”– Biologically\",\"authors\":\"Linda Hutcheon, G. Bortolotti\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0014.1357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Like the early evolutionary theory (though unlike Darwin’s own output), much work in literary\\nadaptation today operates only in terms of higher and lower forms, considering adaptations\\nas more or less „faithful” to the „original”. In biology, it was only when this sort of evaluative discourse\\nwas discarded that new questions could be asked and therefore new answers offered. To that\\nend, a biologist and a literary theorist work to develop the homology between biological and cultural\\nadaptation, between natural and cultural selection: stories, in a manner parallel to genes, replicate;\\nadaptations of both evolve with changing environments. Their „success” cannot and should\\nnot, in either case, be limited to their degree of „fidelity” to anything called a „source” or „original”.\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":515211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tekstualia\",\"volume\":\"59 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tekstualia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.1357\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tekstualia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.1357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the Origin of Adaptations: Rethinking Fidelity Discourse and „Success”– Biologically
Like the early evolutionary theory (though unlike Darwin’s own output), much work in literary
adaptation today operates only in terms of higher and lower forms, considering adaptations
as more or less „faithful” to the „original”. In biology, it was only when this sort of evaluative discourse
was discarded that new questions could be asked and therefore new answers offered. To that
end, a biologist and a literary theorist work to develop the homology between biological and cultural
adaptation, between natural and cultural selection: stories, in a manner parallel to genes, replicate;
adaptations of both evolve with changing environments. Their „success” cannot and should
not, in either case, be limited to their degree of „fidelity” to anything called a „source” or „original”.