外科医生在初级全髋关节置换术中的术前数字模板经验和准确性。

Maria Surroca, Silvia Miguela, Agustí Bartra-Ylla, Jorge H Nuñez, Francesc Angles-Crespo
{"title":"外科医生在初级全髋关节置换术中的术前数字模板经验和准确性。","authors":"Maria Surroca, Silvia Miguela, Agustí Bartra-Ylla, Jorge H Nuñez, Francesc Angles-Crespo","doi":"10.5371/hp.2024.36.2.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Preoperative planning has become essential in performance of total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, data regarding the effect of the planner's experience on the accuracy of digital preoperative planning is limited. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of digital templating in THA based on the surgeon's experience.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted. An analysis of 98 anteroposterior pelvic radiographs, which were individually templated by four surgeons (two hip surgeons and two orthopaedic residents) using TraumaCad<sup>®</sup> digital planning, was performed. A comparison of preoperatively planned sizes with implanted sizes was performed to evaluate the accuracy of predicting component size. The results of preoperative planning performed by hip surgeons and orthopaedic residents were compared for testing of the planner's experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Femoral stem was precisely predicted in 32.4% of cases, acetabular component in 40.3%, and femoral offset in 76.7%. Prediction of cup size showed greater accuracy than femoral size among all observers. No differences in any variable were observed among the four groups (acetabular cup <i>P</i>=0.07, femoral stem <i>P</i>=0.82, femoral offset <i>P</i>=0.06). All measurements showed good reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] acetabular cup: 0.76, ICC femoral stem: 0.79).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study might suggest that even though a surgeon's experience supports improved precision during the planning stage, it should not be restricted only to surgeons with a high level of experience. We consider preoperative planning an essential part of the surgery, which should be included in training for orthopaedics residents.</p>","PeriodicalId":73239,"journal":{"name":"Hip & pelvis","volume":"36 2","pages":"129-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11162868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgeon's Experience and Accuracy of Preoperative Digital Templating in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Surroca, Silvia Miguela, Agustí Bartra-Ylla, Jorge H Nuñez, Francesc Angles-Crespo\",\"doi\":\"10.5371/hp.2024.36.2.129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Preoperative planning has become essential in performance of total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, data regarding the effect of the planner's experience on the accuracy of digital preoperative planning is limited. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of digital templating in THA based on the surgeon's experience.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted. An analysis of 98 anteroposterior pelvic radiographs, which were individually templated by four surgeons (two hip surgeons and two orthopaedic residents) using TraumaCad<sup>®</sup> digital planning, was performed. A comparison of preoperatively planned sizes with implanted sizes was performed to evaluate the accuracy of predicting component size. The results of preoperative planning performed by hip surgeons and orthopaedic residents were compared for testing of the planner's experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Femoral stem was precisely predicted in 32.4% of cases, acetabular component in 40.3%, and femoral offset in 76.7%. Prediction of cup size showed greater accuracy than femoral size among all observers. No differences in any variable were observed among the four groups (acetabular cup <i>P</i>=0.07, femoral stem <i>P</i>=0.82, femoral offset <i>P</i>=0.06). All measurements showed good reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] acetabular cup: 0.76, ICC femoral stem: 0.79).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study might suggest that even though a surgeon's experience supports improved precision during the planning stage, it should not be restricted only to surgeons with a high level of experience. We consider preoperative planning an essential part of the surgery, which should be included in training for orthopaedics residents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hip & pelvis\",\"volume\":\"36 2\",\"pages\":\"129-134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11162868/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hip & pelvis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2024.36.2.129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hip & pelvis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2024.36.2.129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:术前规划在全髋关节置换术(THA)中已变得至关重要。然而,有关规划师经验对数字化术前规划准确性的影响的数据十分有限。本研究的目的是根据外科医生的经验评估全髋关节置换术中数字模板的准确性:本研究是一项回顾性研究。对四名外科医生(两名髋关节外科医生和两名骨科住院医师)使用 TraumaCad® 数字规划系统单独制作的 98 张骨盆前路X光片进行了分析。将术前规划的尺寸与植入的尺寸进行比较,以评估预测组件尺寸的准确性。对髋关节外科医生和骨科住院医生的术前规划结果进行了比较,以检验规划师的经验:结果:32.4%的病例能精确预测股骨柄,40.3%的病例能精确预测髋臼组件,76.7%的病例能精确预测股骨偏移。在所有观察者中,髋臼杯尺寸的预测准确率高于股骨尺寸。四组之间没有发现任何变量存在差异(髋臼杯P=0.07,股骨干P=0.82,股骨偏移P=0.06)。所有测量结果均显示出良好的可靠性(类内相关系数[ICC]髋臼杯为0.76,股骨柄为0.82,股骨偏移量为0.06):0.76,ICC 股骨柄:0.79):结论:本研究结果表明,尽管外科医生的经验有助于提高规划阶段的精确度,但这不应仅限于经验丰富的外科医生。我们认为术前规划是手术的重要组成部分,应纳入骨科住院医生的培训中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgeon's Experience and Accuracy of Preoperative Digital Templating in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Purpose: Preoperative planning has become essential in performance of total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, data regarding the effect of the planner's experience on the accuracy of digital preoperative planning is limited. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of digital templating in THA based on the surgeon's experience.

Materials and methods: A retrospective study was conducted. An analysis of 98 anteroposterior pelvic radiographs, which were individually templated by four surgeons (two hip surgeons and two orthopaedic residents) using TraumaCad® digital planning, was performed. A comparison of preoperatively planned sizes with implanted sizes was performed to evaluate the accuracy of predicting component size. The results of preoperative planning performed by hip surgeons and orthopaedic residents were compared for testing of the planner's experience.

Results: Femoral stem was precisely predicted in 32.4% of cases, acetabular component in 40.3%, and femoral offset in 76.7%. Prediction of cup size showed greater accuracy than femoral size among all observers. No differences in any variable were observed among the four groups (acetabular cup P=0.07, femoral stem P=0.82, femoral offset P=0.06). All measurements showed good reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] acetabular cup: 0.76, ICC femoral stem: 0.79).

Conclusion: The results of this study might suggest that even though a surgeon's experience supports improved precision during the planning stage, it should not be restricted only to surgeons with a high level of experience. We consider preoperative planning an essential part of the surgery, which should be included in training for orthopaedics residents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信