谷歌和 ChatGPT 在自动生成健康相关多选题方面的比较。

Vivien Song, David Kauchak, John Hamre, Nick Morgenstein, Gondy Leroy
{"title":"谷歌和 ChatGPT 在自动生成健康相关多选题方面的比较。","authors":"Vivien Song, David Kauchak, John Hamre, Nick Morgenstein, Gondy Leroy","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Critical to producing accessible content is an understanding of what characteristics affect understanding and comprehension. To answer this question, we are producing a large corpus of health-related texts with associated questions that can be read or listened to by study participants to measure the difficulty of the underlying content, which can later be used to better understand text difficulty and user comprehension. In this paper, we examine methods for automatically generating multiple-choice questions using Google's related questions and ChatGPT. Overall, we find both algorithms generate reasonable questions that are complementary; ChatGPT questions are more similar to the snippet while Google related-search questions have more lexical variation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72181,"journal":{"name":"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11141817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Google and ChatGPT for Automatic Generation of Health-related Multiple-choice Questions.\",\"authors\":\"Vivien Song, David Kauchak, John Hamre, Nick Morgenstein, Gondy Leroy\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Critical to producing accessible content is an understanding of what characteristics affect understanding and comprehension. To answer this question, we are producing a large corpus of health-related texts with associated questions that can be read or listened to by study participants to measure the difficulty of the underlying content, which can later be used to better understand text difficulty and user comprehension. In this paper, we examine methods for automatically generating multiple-choice questions using Google's related questions and ChatGPT. Overall, we find both algorithms generate reasonable questions that are complementary; ChatGPT questions are more similar to the snippet while Google related-search questions have more lexical variation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11141817/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

制作无障碍内容的关键是了解哪些特征会影响理解和领悟。为了回答这个问题,我们正在制作一个带有相关问题的大型健康相关文本语料库,研究参与者可以通过阅读或聆听这些问题来衡量基础内容的难度,之后可以利用这些问题更好地理解文本难度和用户理解能力。在本文中,我们研究了使用谷歌相关问题和 ChatGPT 自动生成选择题的方法。总的来说,我们发现这两种算法生成的问题都很合理,而且具有互补性;ChatGPT 的问题与片段更为相似,而谷歌的相关搜索问题则具有更多的词汇变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Google and ChatGPT for Automatic Generation of Health-related Multiple-choice Questions.

Critical to producing accessible content is an understanding of what characteristics affect understanding and comprehension. To answer this question, we are producing a large corpus of health-related texts with associated questions that can be read or listened to by study participants to measure the difficulty of the underlying content, which can later be used to better understand text difficulty and user comprehension. In this paper, we examine methods for automatically generating multiple-choice questions using Google's related questions and ChatGPT. Overall, we find both algorithms generate reasonable questions that are complementary; ChatGPT questions are more similar to the snippet while Google related-search questions have more lexical variation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信